Guest Vitamin X Posted October 22, 2007 Report Posted October 22, 2007 Indeed. THE 30 MOST UNSETTLING GERMAN COSTUMES
Giuseppe Zangara Posted October 22, 2007 Report Posted October 22, 2007 Wait, is that the Cracked? As in Mad-knock-offs Cracked?
Gary Floyd Posted October 22, 2007 Report Posted October 22, 2007 Mike Nelson wrote for Cracked, as you can see here.
Giuseppe Zangara Posted October 22, 2007 Report Posted October 22, 2007 Mike Nelson didn't have Joel Hodgson's courtesy to disappear from the public eye post-MST3k.
Nighthawk Posted October 23, 2007 Report Posted October 23, 2007 Cracked is pathetic now (so is MAD, but at least they're still a magazine). I give them credit for hanging in there a long time, though. There were a lot of MAD rip offs that didn't, you know. They acquired some of MAD's best artists over the years too, like Don Martin and John Severin.
alfdogg Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 (edited) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImD3agVjb0U Edited October 24, 2007 by alfdogg
B@RTOK Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 Too scary for TSM You know, throughout the history of my readind TSM I don't think you have ever said anything to disapoint me. However this post had no real point to it. I have no idea what the quote above means. Perhaps that is the reason that I have not enjoyed writting a response; especially since halloween is an awesome holiday. Perhaps this computer isn't showing what you intended to show. This post however offends me, and although I know you could care less I just thought you should know. there is no need to write a response to this, other people don't write intelligably. So I just thought you should know my oppinion. You are one of my most respected posters on TSM, keep up the good work aside from this.
Guest Gym Class Fallout Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 Bartok doesn't appreciate a good phantom post when he sees one.
Slayer Posted October 27, 2007 Author Report Posted October 27, 2007 If Bartok understood the reference he'd realize how wonderfully it played off the original Now I can only hope that I don't further disapoint Bartok's oppinions regarding his readinds of my writting
Kinetic Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 B@rtok is taking everyone to task. It's about time someone used a bit of frontier justice...cleaned this place up a bit. And, yeah, Slayer. That was a rare misstep.
Hoff Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 Oh, my. readind disapoint writting intelligably oppinion You, sir, have struck out.
Slayer Posted October 27, 2007 Author Report Posted October 27, 2007 Speaking of baseball and phantom posts, I believe this was the original use of "too hot for TSM" I had to use google to find it, since the stupid Invision engine won't let you search for words under four letters (as Czech and I were discussing the other day)
Hoff Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 Speaking of you, Czech, and discussing, I fully intend to make Monday's Maff chat, so put on the tea and set the table. Unless there is no Maff chat, which will be a disappointment.
B@RTOK Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 If Bartok understood the reference he'd realize how wonderfully it played off the original Now I can only hope that I don't further disapoint Bartok's oppinions regarding his readinds of my writting Would you please explain the reference then. also i realize my grammar is poor, I am horrible at english writting and I have accepted that. Usually I don't make to many speeling errors, however last night i was drunk and it was very late.
Guest Gym Class Fallout Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 Okay. There is a strange glitch in the board software in which maybe every one in 1000 threads, the thread shows up with no posts in it. There's a title, and a thread-starter, but no first post. Whoever the first person to see this (usually Slayer) will proclaim that the thread must've been "too hot for TSM," as if some omnipotent force declared that we could not read this post. Then the first post is that, even though the first-first guy gets credit for starting the thread. It's weird. That's all.
Guest Why2J Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 Would you please explain the reference then. also i realize my grammar is poor, I am horrible at english writting and I have accepted that. Usually I don't make to many speeling errors, however last night i was drunk and it was very late. He nearly destroyed my house. He's presently drinking again, and on cocaine.
Hoff Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 Usually I don't make to many speeling errors
Guest benoitwasmurdered Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 Speaking of you, Czech, and discussing, I fully intend to make Monday's Maff chat, so put on the tea and set the table. Unless there is no Maff chat, which will be a disappointment. There will be a chat, not that we trust you to keep your promises.
B@RTOK Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 If Bartok understood the reference he'd realize how wonderfully it played off the original Now I can only hope that I don't further disapoint Bartok's oppinions regarding his readinds of my writting Would you please explain the reference then. also i realize my grammar is poor, I am horrible at english writting and I have accepted that. Usually I don't make to many speeling errors, however last night i was drunk and it was very late. Ha!
Hoff Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 If Bartok understood the reference he'd realize how wonderfully it played off the original Now I can only hope that I don't further disapoint Bartok's oppinions regarding his readinds of my writting Would you please explain the reference then. also i realize my grammar is poor, I am horrible at english writting and I have accepted that. Usually I don't make to many speeling errors, however last night i was drunk and it was very late. You didn't even catch every error in that sentence. Fan-tastic.
alfdogg Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 My uncle was wrong, btw. DST ends next Sunday, not today. Guess I better change my clocks back!
BUTT Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 Okay. There is a strange glitch in the board software in which maybe every one in 1000 threads, the thread shows up with no posts in it. There's a title, and a thread-starter, but no first post. Whoever the first person to see this (usually Slayer) will proclaim that the thread must've been "too hot for TSM," as if some omnipotent force declared that we could not read this post. Then the first post is that, even though the first-first guy gets credit for starting the thread. It's weird. That's all. I remember on one occasion somehow I was aware beforehand that this was going to take place, and so I started a thread called "THE INVISIBLE POST" and hopefully created lots of confusion. Also I hope to make this Monday's chat should such an event take place.
B@RTOK Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 If Bartok understood the reference he'd realize how wonderfully it played off the original Now I can only hope that I don't further disapoint Bartok's oppinions regarding his readinds of my writting Would you please explain the reference then. also i realize my grammar is poor, I am horrible at english writting and I have accepted that. Usually I don't make to many speeling errors, however last night i was drunk and it was very late. You didn't even catch every error in that sentence. Fan-tastic. the point was that I mispelled spelling, I thought that was funny. If I wanted to catch all of my spelling errors I would have edited my post.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now