I heard that, too, albeit it IS just a rumor.
And if so, all the better. Kerry's horrible, and even if Dean doesn't win it, I'd prefer Edwards x100 over Kerry.
Nope, but I'm not sitting here making asinine assumptions, either. Go ahead and research it, or shut the fuck up, mmkay?
You're the one who brought the topic up in the first place. Prove it or continue being a joke. Your call!
We sit back and laugh when he criticizes the administration, because he's preaching to the right crowd on Fox News.
However, nothing changes the fact that he's a big, blubbering vagina.
It's different because this, in effect, allows the "married" couples to sue for their right to marriage. Something is being taken away when the certificates are eventually (and officially) ruled invalid, so they could potentially challenge the ruling in court.
The difference between that and this is that Roy Moore was simply being a blockhead for absolutely no reason. There was nothing good that could possibly have come from that, whereas this could spring a challenge of the ballot measure in the California courts.
None of the candidates are responsible for the AWOL issue. That's been brought up in liberal circles since 2000.
Mike was talking about the policy attacks on Bush by democratic candidates. I was pointing out that this is simply bullshit. Surely, you understand this, don't you?