So Masters and Carlito will be the last guys Triple H gets to crush while Shelton will be first?
Honestly, your year long title reign for Triple H plan is terrible. He simply doesn't have enough strong challengers on Raw. The most of the names you mention have already been soundly beaten by Triple H or are well past their prime. You could not fill a year with Triple H main events unless you start re-hasing them over and over. At the point nobody is going to watch because he's already beaten everyone. That's why your idea sucks.
You realise he's still over - depsite the constnat feeding him challengers bit. Criticising a year long title reign because you dont like the champion, yet praising Samoa Joe's title reign in ROH is absurd, and hypocritical evidence of an anti-WWE bias
It doesn't matter how over he is. If the opponents are weak nobody will care because the result is a given. Why would you pay to watch Triple H beat a guy he's already beaten time and time again?
I may not like Triple H but a year long reign for anyone would be a bad thing right now. WWE need to build up credible main event guys not have everyone jobbing to Triple H or anybody else.
BTW, thanks for making up stuff to try and help your "argument".