dubq

The other way around. Think about it.

Owen's the kinda guy who'd be standing there.. calm, cool and collected, drinking a martini (shaken, not stirred).. and the next thing you know you're on the floor with a light bulb in your mouth and he's punching you in the face. Awww, yeah!

Hilarious British version, or shite American knock off?

Clive. Motherfuckin'. Owen.

It's a hole as far as I'm concerned. This city wastes or tax dollars faster than the federal Liberal's do.

It's riduculous and it makes me want to get the fuck out of this city before it really gets bad. Someone needs to step up and start enforcing these fucking laws. We need to be more like Singapore.

Ugh, they look like little tongues...

Fucking polo shirts...

I wonder why... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Boo-fucking-hoo.

Rock on, Little Britain, that fucking show is fucking hilarious.

Dude, there's no way they'd add the JBA's. That's way too obscure of a reference for todays audience.

Tales from the Crypt S1, Citizen Kane [finally!] - next up, I really want to grab the first season of Little Britain.

Actually, Flair was GM beforehand, wasn't he?

Actually, there's an international group of designers, economists, etc. that do a shit load of studying to "forecast" what colours are going to be "in" for the next little while. Everyone from clothing companies to car companies go to them for this sort of research. I was at a conference during a branding study and it was one of the main discussions on the floor, as one of the top reps of this "colour consortium" was there to do a speech. He went on to say that pink was going to be "in" for at least 8 more years. That was last year, so I guess we have 7 more of this bullshit. [and after that it's supposedly going to be "latino" colours that will be the big shit, ie: green, yellow, red, etc.] Yes, I am a stereotypical male, and I hate pink. Mostly because at the company I was working at for the past 5 years had a pink logo and it was a fucking bitch to reproduce into any sort of print or web design. The colour consortium guy said we were very "lucky" to have that logo. I wanted to punch him in the throat. ARGH! Sorry, got a little ranty there...

Begins handled it way better, though. In the sense that there was really only one main villian and the others were just supporting cast. When you start getting into two main villians, then you end up with over-saturation, IMO.

Alrighty. Decided. Dawn gets my vote.

I hardly linger. I've been very vocal over the past few years about not jumping on the HHHating goon bandwagon.

Because he's on the TEAM does not mean he has FINAL say.

You can't possibly think it's a good thing for your top wrestler to be on the writing team, do you? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Oh, yes I can.

I could've, but I wouldn't let myself. It's one of those movies, like Session 9, where I let the actual movie take me where it wants to go. I have more fun watching it that way.

It was closed several months ago. I kept the DVD releases updated, but we didn't have any other contributers and not enough hits to encourage me or rant to keep the content up ourselves. I probably could've tried harder, but I think even rant was getting low on ideas on how to turn it around. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> D'oh, that sucks.

One villian is enough, IMO, and the Joker doesn't need a sidekick. Sowing the seeds for Two Face is fine, but as long as the Joker is the main and only villian in the movie, then they won't fall into that bullshit trap that the other movies fell into.

But they want to cry about it some more, Rudo. Same old, same old.

I'd heard that she was quite pissed that they made her hetero in the movie. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11...1674269,00.html

True. Some dude on the IMDB forums is saying that it's been created by some "online community called General Mayhem" or something like that.