Who cares; I don't like them. Plus, why were they mentioned in this thread?
Oasis:
They had some decent singles early in their career, but why are you mentioning them in this thread? You dismiss Prodigy as being "irrelvant," yet you cite Oasis. No one in the States has cared about this fucking band in nearly a decade, outside of the NME-reading anglophiles who get their kicks from whichever Gallagher brother went on a cocaine-fueled public tirade. This–plus mentioning Prodigy—makes me think you listed every band you've ever heard of rather than come up with any salient argument.
Modest Mouse:
Have you even heard The Lonesome Crowded West? Isaac Brock obv. spent his formative years fawning over Doolittle.
Flaming Lips:
Their last couple of EPs and the most recent LP were terrible.
Hey, I can deny the absurdity of that concept. And glad to see you have such high standards!
They wanted to make money. What a shock. Maybe when you're older, you'll realize there's more to life than "artistic integrity." That shit don't pay the bills.
Outkast, probably the best band of the 90s:
Objectively? You're lucky I even gave a response to your childish, ignorant, hyperbolic PR-screed.
Radiohead's totally awesome and rockin' live show:
What fact? You casually mention some magazines that claim what you said to be true, yet offer nothing to back it up. It's an opinion, kid. Since expecting you to own a dictionary is probably a little much, just bookmark this page: http://www.dictionary.com
I've validated your existence. Congratulations.