Styles

Are you trolling now? Jesus Christ...

The humor of someone who proclaims Jeff Jarrett as their diety of choice thinking SOMEONE ELSE is living in a fantasy world is incredible. Someone who has absolutely no idea of the sarcasm or story behind the sn, yet tries to act like you know what you're talking about is incredible... Ah, so you're a gimmick poster. EVEN BETTER. right...

The humor of someone who proclaims Jeff Jarrett as their diety of choice thinking SOMEONE ELSE is living in a fantasy world is incredible. It's taking the piss out of Dave O'Neill, Journalist For the BILLIONTH time he makes an assertion without doing any research, has no idea what the fuck he's talking about and then backtracks for it...

The humor of someone who proclaims Jeff Jarrett as their diety of choice thinking SOMEONE ELSE is living in a fantasy world is incredible. Someone who has absolutely no idea of the sarcasm or story behind the sn, yet tries to act like you know what you're talking about is incredible...

Don't forget the neo nazi site, that makes strike 3. You've had to apologize for 3 incredibly stupid posts in the span of, what, a few days!?

I just feel sorry for him. He obviously lives in a fantasy world and has absolutely no grasp on common sense or the basic skills or knowledge needed to make rational discussions in CE. Hopefully he just goes away...

Sure, chocolate chip would be scrumptious!

If you can't handle the heat, get the fuck out of the kitchen. You said you supported PETA even though you didn't know much about them. Brilliant, I gave you a bunch of links so you can see everything they have given to this world...

It doesn't sound like he thinks much before he says anything!

Kamui, just because you're too fucking stupid to actually look into a group before you claim support for it, you can check out any of these threads to learn of numerous examples of stupidity you claimt to support... http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...t=28391&hl=peta http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...t=30873&hl=peta http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...=18&t=27275&hl= http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...=18&t=27235&hl= http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...t=44425&hl=peta http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...=18&t=20698&hl= http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...=18&t=18294&hl= http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...=18&t=15835&hl=

Let it be stated here: Kamui is a PETA SUPPORTER. What little credibility you had left, just died...

If the US doesn't get involved in a world conflict we're being evil, greedy, selfish isolationists that don't want to take the responsibility that comes with our great wealth and strength. If the US does get involved in a world vonflict we're being evil, greedy, selfish imperialists trying to use our wealth and strength to kill the innocent and colonize countries for our own gain. You can't win...

An isolationist. Ok. Last time we tried that, world war broke out. And hmmm, how exactly would you handle countries sponsoring terrorists flying planes into our buildings? Sitting there and doing nothing? Not FUNDING THEM and then pissing them off by sticking our noses in conflicts that have no relevance to us, for one. OOh, zing, or something... You clearly have no idea what you're talking about...

This actually makes me think more of an X episode than anything else..... I wish more people would worry about all the animals that die who are, you know, ALREADY BORN that human fetuses that don't possess less intelligence than your average sewer rat. BUT HEY....they have SOULS~!! Or something. I'd imagine you're a PETA supporter?

An isolationist. Ok. Last time we tried that, world war broke out. And hmmm, how exactly would you handle countries sponsoring terrorists flying planes into our buildings? Sitting there and doing nothing?

Shhhhh, you'll confuse him!

Who says these people have no remorse?

In public. I could care less what you do in your own home. That's why I think drugs should be legalized. What someone does in the privacy of their own home is their business, and it's not the job of the government to tell you that you can't harm yourself. Once people take the drugs outside their home and mess someone else up, then they should have the bloody book thrown at them. Legalize, but don't have ANY tolerance for people who fuck it up. I just think if you legalise pot, you're saying it's "ok" and therefore people who otherwise wouldn't risk being high in public or in a car would do so more often, much like with alcohol. That's my fear.

That's fine. We can't have a "self-hating Democrat" in charge of too much, in case he decides to get in touch with his feelings... Colonel KKK, you are now my Chief of Staff. lol. General I will inform you as soon as I switch parties, likely closer to the primary election in Maryland. Perhaps then I'd be up for a promotion. Until then, happy to serve, sir!

Cool, I guess if someone dies, I work my way up I guess we're the C.I.A. Conservatives....dum dum dum, dah dah dum...In Action!...dum dum dum, dah dah dum...

<----PICK ME STEVE! My qualifications: -Am good at mindlessly agreeing with whatever the leader says. -Flowing with cynism and sarcasm -Think Moore is fat (although I like Moore-on much better) -Am convinced that Howard Dean is a nutcase who is dangerous for this country. -Since I'm technically still registered a D, I could infiltrate their camp. -If you don't include me, I will find some way to sue you for being a JJ, God-ist~!

Since everyone else is doing it and I'm just a sheep that does things for acceptance... 1. No. I don't think there needs to be "a war on drugs" but I don't believe in legalization. We have enough alcohol related deaths, especially by car, we don't need the rate to shoot up for drug accidents too. 2. Yes, but it's not important to me. 3. Yes. If it weren't for the sake of upholding the soveigrnty of the constitution I would say guns themselves should be removed from society but Im not that radical and understand why they are not. 4. Yes, another case where it's not important to me. As long as it doesn't effect me, why should I care? 5. Yes. 6. Yes. Get to the bastards before they get to us again. 7. No. I don't believe in this complete secular overhaul. Much like Dr. Tom I am not a religious person but having "God" in our pledge or on a statue does not bother me or offend me. I am more tolerant than those that call for the removal because I am tolerant of the vast majority of America that do believe in a God (not any one religion is being endorsed mind you), as did our founders. Plus, the whole idea behind it, is to build up America as a "country of God" as a way of putting ourselves on a moral pedistool above the "godless" countries, so anything like that I'm cool with. "In God We Trust" with that badass eagle is one kick ass slogan/symbol. It's like it's saying "Don't Tread On Me Motherfucker."

Liberals hate fun. You FUN-IST~!

Gulliani? I'd hit it.....wait...I mean I'd vote it!

Hey, just so no one feels left out, the liberal contigent can form a group too...but in keeping with the ideology it will have to be void of rankings or positions and just be one big committee where everyone has to agree before anything is decided on...