Just call me Dan

I would too. Don't worry. I wouldn't expect much, but I'd pay to see it.

Your points are all valid, but would have been more suited for thier match at summerslam 2000. You seem to be questioning Kane's character as a whole, and while it is contrasting, it would be a simple plan. Taker has always contained Kane, and if he continues his rampage and seems to be at that unstoppable point, who would you call upon to thwart him?

Problem there is, this would not be big money especially after shawn gets butchered by MARK HENRY and seems to be setting up for a clean loss to Goldberg. Then what? Realistically speaking, Rock wants to come back for some big time dream match, and with Shawn having been back for near 2 years now, it would be without a lot of luster. I'd say the Rock would come back and face Sting at Mania, but unless this really gets some insane hype, I don't see it happening. I'd still enjoy it, but it's not really feasible according to how the rock looks upon his career at this point.

With a win over Kane? No. Kane has ALWAYS been Taker's whipping boy, and if Taker goes, Kane is the big gothic like guy in the fed. He goes over, period.

The quality for the vid is terrible, but it showcases a lot of the overall gamepley. Nice shots of pretty much everyone in the game. I really enjoyed goldberg crawling for the ropes while in the Anklelock. If that is how everyone reacts to submissions, it will be nice when you wear them down and they get to the point where there is nowhere to go and must tap.

I should hope not. Looking at his in-ring performances in the past year, I surely don't mind him gutting it out for a few more years. It would be nice to say "I retired at Wrestlemania 20", but I don't think he will.

I have stated before that i REALLY want to see that match, but Shawn would have to be REALLY built up again to be able have some sort of "big time" feeling for a Rock feud. I really don't want a heel turn with him refusing to do a lot of things he would have before now that he is a christian, and I certainly don't want him going over all the midcard in an attempt to re-establish himself.

Zack

Well the only time he jobbed at 'Mania was as a heel, so I'd say his chances of jobbing as a heel are much greater than superman babyface HHH.

Go back to your boycott thread if you want to spout your Goldberg hatred. We get the point, and you can move on. In the meantime, why don't you just answer the question instead of this repetitive crap?

I'd say DDP. Period. What a shame.

Triple H eating goldberg for the title at Wrestlemania would just kill me. The Booker match really killed any of my excitement for the show at 19, and I can't imagine him pulling a Nash and going over.

Godsmack's Serenity is an odd choice, but it sounds quite cool to me these days. I've been listening to it frequently.

Christ, Tom, where did you get that gif, and who is that hot piece of ass?

Has there ever been this many gimmicks intorduced in one thread? This is like a gimmick congreation.

But he WANTS TO SEE Rock/Brock happen again, and he CAN"T EVER SEE that house show match. Your correction does not help at all.

thrall, I can understand if someone posed the question, "How many times did Rock/Brock EVER wrestle eachother in a match? EVER??" But I would venture to guess that if someone says Rock/Brock happened once, they are not pulling back into the files and searching for any possible house show matches. Basically, I don't think you have to correct that because he was only referencing the one time they met and it was televised and it was available to everyone. You're not wrong, it's just that your point is rather unecessary. I'll leave you be.

My point is, generally speaking, when you state how many times a "big match" has happened, you can't go counting every house show. According to most, HHH vs Goldberg only happened once, but you could go and bring up some house shows where they squared off to set up for thier match. No one will be able to see those house show matches you speak of, unless they replay them in thier memory from being there or they somehow get released. So, generally speaking, Rock/Brock only happened once that would be accessible by everyone.

So Nash is gonna agree to job clean? Surely after Goldberg plows through him with ease his credibility is completely dead as a top guy. That SHOULD happen, but would he allow that?

The Summerslam match was epic because the crowd was quite involved and it was Brock's first title. Both guys went really hard, and they were feuding for months at the time. there was never a Rock/Brock feud again, so in March of 2003, it could not have been as emotional. I'd also venture to say that 9 times out of 10 a PPV match between 2 guys will be better than a house show meeting. Also, it is rather nitpicky and unecessary for you to try and correct someone who says Rock/Brock happened once by pointing out a house show match. Get over yourself.

Not in a one-on-one match; SummerSlam 2002 was the only one. You know that; why try to pick apart the man's statement when you know it's true? EDIT: I don't remember that match, but i'll take your word for it. Still, i'm sure that was a 9 minute Smackdown match, and no match of PPV calibre. The couldn't have been giving it anywhere near the effort they gave at SS.

Zack Malibu Youth N Asia

I want to see HBK/Rock REALLY bad.

FUCK YOU, WHERE'S MY VOTE!!!!!! With that logic, where was mine?

That's true, but I really enjoy squashing Rikishi all the time.