MarvinisaLunatic

Eli Manning's sack escape heave to keep that drive going will be going down as one of the greatest plays in SB history...

I suppose Plexiglass' TD was big enough to hear him talking after his brialliant 2 catches for 23 yard performance after running his mouth for the last two weeks.

The Ravens are the only team to beat the Giants in the Super Bowl..hehe..

I suppose the 19-0 T Shirts will be an underground collectors item..

Tom Brady got eaten alive there

I think we're going to get our first OT super bowl

Tom Brady with :36 and 3 timeouts only needing a FG to tie..haha they should have run more clock out

If the Giants score, I hope they dont leave much time on the clock lol.

This game was perfect evidence of the need to play the Super Bowl with no week off between. and holy crap what a pass by Eli there..how in the world..?

I think we have our proof that Leena is really a middle aged fat guy...

Dont act like some of the meat from those cows isn't getting into the adult food supply either now. Its not all about the kids here, though more will get done because of them.

I was thinking Bedard.. If the offers for him were better than what the Mets gave up for Santana.. I doubt Bedard would get a 7 year contract but the money would probably be in the same neighborhood. 90 million for like 5 years? Sadly Ive given up on the Os resigning him and almost given up on them trading him this year. They better hope he doesnt get hurt or something stupid so they can deal him next year.

TSM IS IMPLODING! ARGH! ..

why arent some posts showing up..er..or whatever the fuck is going on?

I guess all the stuff you answer on the surveys = nothing? Ive done Harris Interactive Polls for the last 5 years and they give you points that can be redeemed for stuff. I got a $10 restaurant gift card, $10 blockbuster card and the first season of Futurama on DVD from them.

I really hope the guy at least somewhat resembles PN News in real life because thats who I picture him to be and the whole "yo baby yo baby yo baby yo" thing everytime I read one of his posts

Im in the box pool at work. If the last number of the scores are 3 for NY and 2 for NE I win $100 for each quarter it happens and $200 for the final score. Thus Im predicting a final score of 32-23 New England.. the whole "23" thing isn't lost on me either..the game is being played on 2/3..whee!

The worst part is she's given her father an excuse to sing again. Fun fact: Miley Ray Cyrus' original name was Destiny. I too would have gotten that name changed, but I dont know if Miley Ray is any better

When Palumbo said "you messed up this time" I distinctly heard Jim duggan saying that.

How about those the conspiracy theorists who claim a terrorist attack prior to the election to keep Bush in office "temporarily" under whatever special circumstances they can come up with? Or have we ditched that already?

Two seperate issues here and I think I got them mixed just a wee bit. Issue A) Slowing down the economy to fix global warming Issue B) We're still going to spend money to fix global warming On A: Just the simple idea that we should slow the economy down if everyone else slows theirs down is rediculous, even though as was agreed, that wont happen so its a bad idea to do it, but he idea was still laid out that if everyone else did, we would go along with slowing our economy. Do the vast majority of americans want a slow economy (slower than what we have right now) in order to possibly change the whole global warming thing a 100 years from now? I doubt it. On B: (and of little relevance to the article but I got on a rant) Politicians across the board still want to the US to foot the bill to fix Global Warming even though major polluting countries like China and India aren't doing anything. Thats not exactly slowing our economy but its also not being very smart in my opinion. Its still going to have a negative impact on the economy through excessive regulation and more lost jobs, and its going to cost in upwards of a trillion dollars a year for no real tangible positive results as long as other countries continue to do nothing. I stand behind what I posted, I just needed to make myself clearer. Until other countries that contribute to the so called problem start agreeing to be a part of the solution, I dont think the United States should be monetarily responsible for doing anything more than taking measures to get energy independence and domestic sources tapped as well as other alternative fuels and even cleaner air standards, things that would definitely benefit our country as a whole and would not be affected at all by the fact that China and India will continue to pollute out tons of CO2 at a higher rate than the United States...but we should do absolutely nothing for the sole purpose of fixing global warming because it is not just our problem and the United States shouldn't be the Worlds doctor as well as police officer and charity fund.

this is directly from the bastion of liberal truth, Media Matters (who are arguing the same point you are, that taken out of context he didn't really say what he said..huh?) Basically hes saying in order to do something about Global Warming, all of the "rich countries" have to cut slow their economies and yet he realizes that some countries wont do a thing. If some of the leading polluters of CO2 in China and India are going to do absolutely nothing, why the hell are we going to sit over here and put the economy in decline so that they can continue to pollute the planet just the same? Maybe so we can feel good about ourselves? I dont know..if Global Warming is real, then no ammount of action we take as Americans or in Europe will matter to a hill of beans in the overall global consequences and we'll all still suffer because the China's and Indias of the world. So until you get all the major players on board, it makes absolutely no sense to spend billions (and even trillions of dollars in John McCains plans) a year to try and do something about Global Warming that just about all the global warming scientists agree will have no real value result for the money spent. Like was said in the debate..its GLOBAL WARMING...not AMERICA WARMING.

Yeah I'm gonna trust a guy who gets his opinions on science from Glen Beck. And I gotta agree, I think McCain has separated himself from W enough in the eyes of the people (whether it's true or not) that, with some decent campaigning, W's trainwreck of a presidency isn't going to hurt him too much. I was antil global warming even before I began listening to Glenn Beck again so dont give me that. All it takes is for someone who wants to use their own damn brain to look for some opposing viewpoints, which all trump any crap Al Gore and the rest of the environmentalists say in support of Global Warming. For starters, you dont even have to go back but 33 years to a time when scientists were swearing up and down that we were going through Global Cooling in the 1970s because temperatures were dropping since the the 1940's. By 1975, Newsweek ran the article "the Cooling World" and pointed to a half a degree temperature drop in the northern hemisphere since 1945 as a basis for "Global Cooling" being iminient, going as far to say Sounds pretty damn familiar doesn't it? All the basis of this "OMG WERE GOING INTO AN ICE AGE!!" was put in a 1/2 degree temeperature change in the northern hemisphere in a 30 year period. It all sounds pretty familiar to me now when you hear the global warming scientists spewing the same garbage right back in the opposite direction with the same damn disaster scenario fearmongering tactics that were used in the Newsweek article. I could swap out a few things and those disaster scenarios sound almost exactly like the ones peddled by Al Gore in "An Inconvenient Truth". Theres plenty of information available on global temperature cycles which indicates these warming/cooling trends are natural and not affected in anyway by humans, which is why there are many scientists predicting not only that 2008 will be the coolest year in a decade, but also that the earth is on the verge of entering another cooling cycle which could last into the year 2050 or so.

Rock Band will eventually make it to the nintendo apparently..EA did everything but give a firm release date.

Someone needs to ask Hillary about what Bill said: Uh..what? Lets slow the economy down to save the planet! Yeah..I kinda find it hard to believe that he "mis-spoke" or that he was "misunderstood".. That should read more like "Everybody Some people knowsthink that global warming is real," because he's certainly not speaking for me or the millions of others who haven't been brainwashed into the whole Global Warming thing. And to say that we need to risk putting our economy back into recession to try and solve a global problem that other major countries (China) are not doing anything to solve is beyond absolute stupidity. For every ounce of CO2 we prevent going into the atmosphere, China will release a pound no matter what we do. He does mention this, but if he realizes this why would he even suggest such a thing as slowing the economy down in the first place now? I honestly cant believe he'd say such a thing in the midst of the "We need this $150250 billion foreign wellfare bailout to stimulate the economy" crap.. Edit: and I would buy any energy policy that was based on lowering dependence on foreign oil, better energy conservation (so we dont have blackouts in 10 years because we're not able to increase the amount of energy production), increasing domestic output (drilling for oil in places the econuts dont want us to because some poor elk might have to move over a few feet), more nuclear energy (screw the not in my backyard folks)..Hell, I might even support things that would help improve air quality. But screw it all if they're doing it in the name of saving us from Global Warming.