Mole

I wonder if my DVD recorder records in HD. It has the HD things in the back of it, I just need to buy some extra cords.

I don't see that much of a difference with my 360 playing DVDs in HD. I mean, it looks nice and all but it isn't TRUE HD. And fuckin Leno and Letterman were awesome in HD. Not as good as SportsCenter, but still. And it sucks the Late Late show isn't in HD. I wonder if the CW will be in HD.

http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/veronica-mars.html DVD Artwork for season 2. There better be some fuckin commentaries on this set.

So how was it filmed then?

Unless PS3 will only play Blu-Ray, but I don't know about that.

Who? Are they going to have brand new characters and what not?

All of them? Like every episode? I don't believe it.

Wow, the teenies out there are going to be happy that OTH got picked up. And FUCK YES TO VERONICA MARS!!!

I think the only show ever to do well on Friday night was the X-Files.

I have digital cable, so I get a shit load of channels and I am only paying $5 a month. Well, I guess it is included in my rent, but whatever, still a good deal.

Where is the guy from the first DJ?

Oh my goodness, you are missing my point. I am sure the episodes themselves are smart, I am talking about smart season storylines. They don't have that. LOST, 24, Prison Break etc have those.

I noticed the fuzziness was just in the dark. I guess it wasn't fuzziness, but more like the colors being distorted or something. But when something is in true HD, like baseball on ESPN, everything is clearer than the day. It is like I am there and I love it. I just noticed on SC, that basketball looks amazing. Maybe even better than baseball.

Oh, well then.

I never said they did. I am just saying that CSI isn't smart because of the stand alone episodes. And I shouldn't say anything about WaT because I haven't seen it. Tomorrow is CW's lineup and I am most pumped for that out of all the networks. Not because I like the shows but I'd like to see what the network will look like.

I wonder what "they aren't who they say they are" thing is.

No it isn't. A smart show is one that has season long storylines not stand alone ones. CSI might be smart science wise, but not storyline wise. The same goes for Law & Order, Without a Trace and those shows. Actually, I've never watched WaT, but I am guessing it is the same as the others. VM is in depth with season long storylines, it could fill 5 seasons. That is smart TV.

That is why they should still sell Powerbooks.

Nevermind. EDIT: And it looks like they don't sell Powerbooks anymore. Which is a shame because they kick ass. But since I am going to return my Powerbook tomorrow because it broke, I think I am going to pick up a MacBook. Even though it broke, which is weird because they usually don't.

Well maybe by year 2067 they will, but not anytime soon. It sucks that LOST isn't in TRUE HD because you can see some fuzziness and what not. But the Sopranos look like they are in true HD, even though they are both shot in 4:3. How come baseball, like on ESPN for example, has the same camera shots on ESPN and ESPNHD but the HD is in HD? How do they do that?

I like the INHD because they have some different programming on there. I am also a big fan of the nature stuff because it looks so good. I've yet to see a hockey game on HD, I've been told its the best way to watch it other than going there. So by 2009 everything 'should' be in HD?

I know this has been said before but ESPN needs to STOP TALKING ABOUT BARRY BONDS!!! NO ONE CARES THAT MUCH. JESUS FUCKIN CHRIST. Last night on SC, they showed the Giants highlights and ONLY SHOWED Bonds' hits and that is it. And the Giants won 11-3. WHY NOT SHOW THE OTHER BATTERS HITS? Fuckin pisses me off.

Even though people want the WWE logo away from ECW, there will need to be tons of advertising on Raw and SD about ECW on Sci Fi. The only way they will be able to get any ratings.

Except that Rey can't ever be a heel.