Hunter's Torn Quad

If saying it will 'get people talking' really is an understatement, then it's either someone who is roided to the gills or a major surprise name that nobody sees coming.

Secrecy? Won't we know anyway when the spoilers come out tonight? Obviously, but if the decision 'will get people talking' then it's something they don't want leaked ahead of the tapings, for whatever reason.

WWE released their statement to TMZ:

From Alvarez:

Did I hear right, and that Benoit's T/E ratio was 59:1?

I'm thinking Great Khali.

After Hardy won his match, did I hear JR talk about how everyone was smiling? And we saw a replay of the finish to Cena/Umaga at the Rumble, with Cena wrapping a rope around Umaga's neck and chocking him unconscious. I don't think they've aired it on TV before, at least not since shortly after the Rumble. That finish sounds familiar...

Who was that? John Laurinaitis was openly recruiting wrestlers at Eddie's funeral. Details? I don't remember this one at all. I remember he spoke to either Charlie Haas or Jackie Gayda about coming back; one of them mentioned it in an interview a few months after the event.

Who was that? John Laurinaitis was openly recruiting wrestlers at Eddie's funeral.

Three prospective or reigning Smackdown champions in a row go down with torn muscles. Something in the water, maybe?

If Booker is going to be Hunter's first victim, should Booker really be bouncing around for a commentator?

Shawn Michaels vs. Vader in a dark match Don't blink, because you will miss it.

http://www.accessnorthga.com/news/ap_newfu...ry.asp?ID=94982

The first bookmark on all WWE superstars laptops: IPassedMyDrugTest.com

If the enforcement of the policy is a joke then the policy is a joke, no matter how 'solid' the language of it is. No its not. You can't point at a written policy, like those on news shows have been trying to do and some here as proof that their wellness policy is a joke when the policy itself is very solid. The written policy IS a joke. It is bullshit that the prescription loopholes (for injury rehab and TRT) are there. It's bullshit that 4:1 isn't a failure. It's bullshit that it doesn't require a witness to collection of urine samples. But at least it's well written bullshit.

Except being repeatedly fined, suspended for 60 days and to go from winning the World title at Wrestlemania to being the one who drops the fall to Rey.

It wasn't during Wrestlemania weekend, but yes, Orton's suspension was because he was smoking marijuana in full view of anyone who might come along.

Spike will be showing UFC 75 on a tape delay at 9pm.

If the enforcement of the policy is a joke then the policy is a joke, no matter how 'solid' the language of it is.

You mean it's not the same as the NFL policy, as claimed? I'm shocked. Seriously, the policy as it is written is a joke when you can be as high as 9:1 and still be considered as passing the test if you can provide a valid prescription for the drugs in question, which isn't exactly hard with a mark doctor. If they actually did make 4:1 an automatic failure, we might be getting somewhere. I believe the 5:1 to 9:1 semi-positives require re-testing first, not a scrip, which can get you out of a 10:1 (or more) failure. When it says "medical evaluation", and it makes a point to differentiate this evaluation from an actual re-test, could be interpreted as meaning they get looked at a doctor and if the doctor determines the reason for the elevated ratio, or the drugs behind it, as being required, then it's given the ok and they're considered as having passed the test.

You mean it's not the same as the NFL policy, as claimed? I'm shocked. Seriously, the policy as it is written is a joke when you can be as high as 9:1 and still be considered as passing the test if you can provide a valid prescription for the drugs in question, which isn't exactly hard with a mark doctor. If they actually did make 4:1 an automatic failure, we might be getting somewhere.

To be fair, both Masters and Orton got made fun of on Raw for losing bulk. Oh, look... Hunter mocks Chris Masters for losing weight Note the remarkable change in Masters' physique.

The Mankind/Rock deal 'makes up' for Russo making a total mess of WCW? Ok.

Kind of puts a dent in the comparison made between the NFL and WWE's testing procedure Kennedy made. When a 4:1 is an automatic failure in the NFL testing and in the WWE testing it's only a suspension if you can't provide a medical reason for it, then it's more than a little misleading to declare them "the same". And where Finlay looked bad on Nancy Grace is here, for those who missed it when previously posted: National Ledger So, either Finlay lied or his woefully misinformed about his own company's wellness policy. Neither of which makes him look good.

PWI