RavishingRickRudo

No, they've up-graded to faking "50/50" polls.

If you look at the Michael Cole Bio, you'll see a ton of wrestling-related stuff on it...

There's way too much football content on it. *giggles at the "two colons" comment*

Eh, I'm liking the shows, but jeez, there's only so much Canada a guy can take. If I wanted Canada, I'd watch Mike Bullard (which I don't). I can understand it for the first day, maybe the second day, but I hope he gets into his regular routine and steers away from the Canada-centric content for the rest of his tour.

I wonder if they'll name it "Firefly: The Movie"..

It also has a really good Freeman vs. White match, another really good Yves Edwards match, Sims/Mir I, and a "technically" better fight than Couture/Ortiz in Couture/Liddell.

I don't have it as my favourites... I don't even use the favourites folder thingie.

"Besides, Cole being responsible for the videos is a misconception; the WWE RAW X Magazine had Vince go over all the guys who made the show great and he referenced the guys who did the videos, Cole wasn't there."

Does anyone else have the WWE logo in their address bar whenever you go on to WWE.com??

Ok, after thinking about it, I think I know why they fight... I was expecting to find out why Spike and Angel fight. This episode was actually really "good", especially as a seemingly throw-away show. Established a lot of stuff, did some neat character development, and reflected various themes in the show.

SAILING THE RIVER TAM Buzz inside certain Los Angeles law firms suggests that talent contracts are being hammered out, and they’re timed around a May start for an upcoming Universal feature about a starship captain, a space hooker, a mysterious preacher and a pair of fugitives named Tam. The bad news: under the scenario discussed, “Firefly: The Movie” wouldn’t hit multiplexes until late 2005. -AICN.com

Wasn't really into this one. Didn't like the actor playing Lawson; too Tom Cruise-ish for me. And was there ever an answer to "Why (we) fight"?

What's so special about this apocalypse? A certain amount of years in the making, maybe?

Yeah, cause Kevin Dunn is completely worthless... considering that the WWE's production values are one of their only strong points and he's to thank for that. Not that I'm saying his eye for talent is any good, shit, he probably was involved in hiring Michael Cole. Besides, Cole being responsible for the videos is a misconception; the WWE RAW X Magazine had Vince go over all the guys who made the show great and he referenced the guys who did the videos, Cole wasn't there. Cole is not a good announcer. For all the improvements he has made over the past year and change, he is still not a good announcer.

So after this supposed "huge move" from Smackdown to RAW and Smackdown's GM doesn't care about it enough to confront the guy involved?

MICHAEL COLE is involved in hiring?! Good God.

Get BOTH, they were top-to-bottom great shows. If I had to pick one, it would be UFC 43.

Angle/Kane had a series of 3 matches from about Decemeber to WM 18 where 2 of them were actually good.

*BIG POP* POKERFACE~!

Vince basically gets away with murder (cough) and the media's indifference towards the WWE lets them off the hook. It's both a blessing and a curse.

Are you saying that the WWE is politically incorrect?

There's a story about him on WWE.com Cornette talked about him on WOL. I, for one, can't stand him.

And you don't work for the WWE for what reason???? Because a certain someone wants a PPV called Shawnvivor Series with a certain someones pose as the entrance way with the wrestlers entering under his crotch.

I told you man, DO NOT CALL THIS! DO NOT CALL THIS! man... you don't know the repercussions of what you just posted will mean. MY GOD MAN, HAVE YOU SEEN WHAT YOU'VE DONE!! Good call though, sets up Goldberg vs. Stone Cold JIC Benoit falls flat on his face... cause lord knows, that boy can't draw...

I dunno why, but that Sandman one was probably my favourite. RVD's "Pick a Hand" thing with Tazz had me on the floor.