Obi Chris Kenobi

Maybes those million+ people he fired last time finally got their P45s and left.

Maybe he strikes back at the Raw roster for losing 0.9 points in the ratings during his absence. Shouts at them for not trying know that the 'Boss' was away. Yeah I know, a long shot.

Sweet, I can have the week I wanted off work now. They said no cos GTA4 was out, losers.

Spoilers, 'blurbs' and so forth were around when the ratings were sky high. If people are going to be turned off, it'll be because of the product at the time; they'll know they'll probably get something they don't want to see and won't tune in to see it. They don't need blurbs to tell them that. Ah yeah, that's true.

I just laughed milk out of my nose and I wasn't even drinking milk. Damn, TNA is pretty fun to watch like that.

This might sound stupid, but, could these 'tv guide blurbs' be a reason that people don't tune in? I mean, if you know whats in store for some part and it sounds crap. Why watch?

He's going to put a wrestler in carbonite? Aww I was thinking he came back in a Darth Vader suit, then I read this haha

I can totally remember seeing him turn heel and there was just dead pan silence. Now I'm confused.

Nah, there was complete silence when he originally turned, think it was at the end of a raw taping.

I posted a link to it above.

Austin's heel turn comes to mind there then. Have to agree with the the Hogan heel turn.

http://theinquirer.net/?article=41361 hahaha what the.. GET OUT!

This sound familiar, I saw something like that at Sandy Bay Caravan Park when I was 15/16. The ring was tiny, and there was just a whole lotta running the ropes and take a clothesline. It was very boring, thankfully, War Zone had just came out on the N64, so I went back and played that instead.

And that's the problem, yet no one wants to buy into it that the world has shitty parents that don't give a damn what their kids sit and play for 5 hours on end. Its clearly the Devil Gamer who makes these Satanic games, that some how walking into houses and into the consoles of 6-12 year olds, and warp their minds. As a store clerk what can you do? You stick to the law and refuse the kid, only for him to bring his parent, who is over age and legal enough to buy the game, you tell them what the game is about, you tell them its not suitable for their kids, and they say... WELL THE GAMES FOR ME! Nothing you can do then.

Oh its all mental, its easier to blame the game then it is the parents. The amount of, call my discriminating here, 'chav' 'scum' families that come into the store to buy games and ignore the warnings you give them about 18 rated games they buy for their 6 year old amazes me. "Are you aware its an 18 rated game?" "Yes, he has loads." "You do know that this game contains, strong langauge, violence, drug and sexual references." "Yeah, he's played on the other ones. Just give me the fucking game." ... ok...

Aye would appear that way. The BBFC is aware that people who play games know its a game, and that they don't feel engaged into a virtual world as much as they do when they watch a film and are captivated by the storyline and well being of the characters. They (BBFC) also found out (from the survey) that those who play games, believe that games don't cause violence, and the violence that has happened was due to the person already being unhinged/suffering from mental problems. So it does look hopeful. http://kotaku.com/gaming/bbfc/brits-consid...ions-254198.php Little bit about it on the link above, but there was a pretty indepth article in Edge, like I mentioned before. Something I do remember from it, was the BBFC saying that they thought that the media did more damage then the game itself, citing that the media probably made Manhunt more popular then it ever had been before during the media frenzy of when the killing happened.

Well the BBFC is just for the UK, so it would only affect us. They decided that they could rate games based on the same model design they had been using as it was for DVDs, a different medium. I think the article was in last months 'Edge' magazine. So, they've taken the answers from surveys they've done and have went away to remodel a ratings system soley for Computer Games and Interactive Software, rather then use the template they had been using for DVDs.

I read somewhere that the BBFC are actually looking into how they classify games anyway, so this may get released yet.

I want to, but I don't want to pay for anything that I'm not sure what it is It's free When did it become free? I thought it was a monthly fee? Are you not thinking of xboxlive itself? I haven't been asked for any details that would suggest a charge for XNA - not even what my msn/xboxlive tag is.

Or never wrote such a thing in the first place. I am not suggesting that any non-WWE wrestler necessarily go over Cena. I am suggesting that WWE get out of its self-imposed box of what it can do and what it can't. A sense of true unpredictability has to be restored to the promotion. But judging how well Santino Marella went over with his surprise 'non-WWE' entrant win of the IC Title went, I can't see them doing that with Cena and the WWE Title.

Holy shit, I'd watch. There was something about RKO that was really good, even though they were just a tag team, you thought 'Hey, together they might actually beat Cena legit.. if they'd stop attacking each other that is'.

INDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED! Sorry, I couldn't resist, I still find it funny.

I'd totally mark out for the return of stables, there's just something about them that makes me want to watch.

LMAO - you're expecting a credible women's division? In TNA? Are we watching the same show? Well, from what we've seen so far, its been pretty decent. Miss Jackie, Gail Kim and Ms. Brooks have all had pretty good matches between them, certinaly more credible then some of WWE's efforts.

What the hell, I don't think even WWE would stoop that low to get a cheap ratings pop. What would they have him do, wrestle a dog?