Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted July 27, 2003 Report Posted July 27, 2003 I seriously think that the league is going to suck with 20 teams. It happened last year and everyone said that we wouldn't go with 20 teams this year. Between the lack of depth in the draft and the fact that half the teams will be dead by week 8, the teams need to be cut back at least to 16, maybe even down to 14. I know it might not sit well, but I think that we should do things to avoid last year's debacle of a league.
Guest razazteca Posted July 27, 2003 Report Posted July 27, 2003 Keeper League rules could be discussed to keep interest for next season. I suggest 4 keepers with the keeper must being drafted or been traded from last season.
Guest Kingpk Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 I agree with Marvin here. 20 teams is just too much. I volunteer to drop myself from the league since I've started one of my own with 11 other WDIers (it's full, so don't ask to join). It just sucks to play with so many people and you KNOW some will drop out. If others decide to do the same and start a smaller league, I'd be happy to join.
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Yahoo doesn't offer keeper league options. So if you are suggesting that we designate keepers and then trust people next year not to draft them, thats not going to work. But I do admit that if we had a keeper league, with a small amount of teams as the official league (in baseball as well as football) that the leagues would probably stay more competitive and active.
Guest razazteca Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Do you know any free keeper leagues?
Guest razazteca Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 We could set a date for dead teams to be contracted. Then have the players on the dead teams sent to waivers. Maybe week 6.
Guest Lightning Flik Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 We could set a date for dead teams to be contracted. Then have the players on the dead teams sent to waivers. Maybe week 6. Make it week 4. The earlier the better. If a person can't be active early enough, then they don't need to belong.
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 I just got a fantasy draft guide magazine and it has tons of ads in it for online fantasy games, Im hoping one of them might be good for something.
Guest razazteca Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Have you tried ESPN yet? It has 3 year keeper league for $49.95.
Guest LaParkaMarka Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 Hey guys, thought I'd get your opinion on a trade that was veto'd in my autodraft league. The trade was: Edgerrin James and Donovan Mcnabb for Shaun Alexander and Jake Plummer As soon as I saw it, I voted to veto it, and here's the reason (posted to our league message board): It's an insanely unbalanced trade. Plummer is as good as a guy like Drew Brees (who is available on freaking waivers) and definately isn't in the same league as Donovan McNabb. Edge for Shaun Alexander is an ok trade on it's own, but Edge+McNabb for Alexander is terrible. Here's what someone else said in response: for one both mcnabb and james are injured bound i was taking a chance and didnt mind it...plummer will be alright this year in denver i think is numbers will be alot better So, think the veto was valid? Are vetos allowed in our league, and how should we handle them? It's kind of an interesting situation, one that I haven't dealt with in fantasy football before.
Guest Lightning Flik Posted July 28, 2003 Report Posted July 28, 2003 The situation is touch and go really. That's a hard one to say. I mean, he is correct that both of them are injuried and thusly, there is always the chance of further rehibilation and stuff might be needed and plus they might not be a factor right away. Personally, I wouldn't have vetoed it, if I knew both guys were injuried. Sure, it's a bad trade that will hand someone a great advantage if it works out right in the end. Yet, another way I'll put it. LPM, if you where the guy getting both of these guys in a trade, and figured it was worth the risk would you do it? I know I would. And if they were both injuried, I'd rather make a trade to get something in return then just dump them into the FA and receive nothing as collateral and someone walking away with them for nothing. Then again that's just me. Personally, I don't think veto (that grants just a single person power to stop a trade) should be allowed. If it's majority rules, then I can also understand from the people in the majority rules category as they want to make sure that the league doesn't get fucked over royally because of a single "bad" trade. It's a toughie that one you posted for us. Again, it'll come down to personal decision and me, I would have let it slide.
Guest razazteca Posted August 4, 2003 Report Posted August 4, 2003 I wonder if this trade will go thru: Kordell Stewart and Leonard Little for Peerless Price and Derrick Brooks I want Price because I have Michael Vick.
Agent_Bond34 Posted August 4, 2003 Report Posted August 4, 2003 We could set a date for dead teams to be contracted. Then have the players on the dead teams sent to waivers. Maybe week 6. There is one slight problem, however. The "Can't Cut List" would kind of mess things up a bit, as there are certain players, whom cannot be cut. I wonder if this trade will go thru: Kordell Stewart and Leonard Little for Peerless Price and Derrick Brooks Has that been accepted?
Guest razazteca Posted August 4, 2003 Report Posted August 4, 2003 The can't cut list is done by yahoo, I am not sure if I can control that. The trade has not gone thru yet. Opinions on making the league a Defense player league? Maybe 4 DL 4 DB 2 D. It works well in the other large league I am in.
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted August 4, 2003 Report Posted August 4, 2003 The can't cut list is done by yahoo, I am not sure if I can control that. The trade has not gone thru yet. Opinions on making the league a Defense player league? Maybe 4 DL 4 DB 2 D. It works well in the other large league I am in. The one benefit of using actual defensive players is that in a 20 team league, the last few rounds of the draft won't end up with teams picking people with funny names who probably won't even make it off the practice squads. Im personally all for the defensive players.
Guest razazteca Posted August 5, 2003 Report Posted August 5, 2003 I am going to pick Al Wilson as one of my defenders
razazteca Posted August 9, 2003 Report Posted August 9, 2003 few minor changes: missed field goals = -1 missed PATs = -3 lowered RB run attempt to .2 30 kickoff yards = 1 point on Defense 20-27 yards = -1 28-35 yards = -4 35 yards = -7
razazteca Posted August 18, 2003 Report Posted August 18, 2003 Just a reminder that the league draft is Saturday. Any suggestions for rule changes or general complaints?
Fökai Posted August 19, 2003 Report Posted August 19, 2003 With twenty teams - man, are the rosters going to SUCK, or what? Raza, just let us know when you've set the Draft Order. ::prays for 10/11/12 position::
razazteca Posted August 19, 2003 Report Posted August 19, 2003 The order will be set 30 minutes before the draft.
razazteca Posted August 22, 2003 Report Posted August 22, 2003 Don't the draft is tomorrow at 5 central, show up at least 15 minutes early.
jimmy no nose Posted August 23, 2003 Report Posted August 23, 2003 Almost forgot the draft was tomorrow. Hopefully I'll make it for the live draft but just in case I've got a lot of pre-ranking to do tonight.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted August 23, 2003 Report Posted August 23, 2003 (edited) Damn. Pick #11. Argh.. Edited August 23, 2003 by MarvinisaLunatic
razazteca Posted August 23, 2003 Report Posted August 23, 2003 One hour and counting, good luck to all who show up for the draft.
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Posted August 23, 2003 Report Posted August 23, 2003 a quick summary of the first round: WORST DRAFT EVER
Cartman Posted August 23, 2003 Report Posted August 23, 2003 I hereby declare my team a complete utter bunch of LOSERS...I'm going to change my team name to "Worst. Team. EVER."
the pinjockey Posted August 23, 2003 Report Posted August 23, 2003 I can't complain. I don't see a spot on my team that I won't get some production from. And I like getting Michael Lewis in the last round since return yards are actually pretty valuable.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted August 23, 2003 Report Posted August 23, 2003 So, like, whos gonna trash talk. I'll Start. I have the best WRs in the league. Owens, Robinson, Kennison and Josh Reed. My RBs suck though, although Morton will give me some good return yard points. And I got Kurt Warner in the 4th Round which is either a good thing or a bad thing..
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now