Guest Crucifixio Jones Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 well uh....fine you win. not like I have a problem with you anyway CJ. I thought you deserved the banning at WDI but I always enjoyed talking to you in the WDI Chats and when SS:2 launches I'll be a dedicated poster...unless you'd rather I not. You thought I deserved to be banned? For what? For daring to oppose a WDI admin in the one place where he doesn't have to make an argument and rather can ban me because he doesn't "like me"? That's ghey. A few of the WDI admins have never liked me and that's fine. But to get banned because of it isn't fair at all. I know it's their board and their prerogative, but to ban someone because your personalities don't mix is fucking pathetic. Hey, that's life. If you work with someone you don't like, you can't ban them from work. You either choose not to socialize with them or you deal with them only when you have to. Only 'net nerds abuse their "power" and simply push buttons to eliminate a "problem." I probably won't like everyone who posts at SNKT II, but that doesn't mean I'm going to let my personal biases influence any decision I make that has to do with them. Unless someone is basically being a Prince Paul, I've never even seen the need to ban someone from a messageboard. When you're banning people for what they say; words on a screen, you're taking yourself and your board way too seriously. You're just proving that you can't "handle" a few cross words or actions aimed in your general direction via the internet. It makes me wonder how such people deal with their problems in real life. The Powers That Be at WDI believe that I am an "act"; that I'm controversial, obnoxious, outspoken and provocative just for the sake of being so. I'm not, it's just how I am. And they ban me for it because basically they can. Having a personality that differs from theirs is a banworthy offense, it seems. They constructed a little net world where they make the rules, probably to deal with the fact that they can't control much outside of it. Fine. I'm not angry at that; enjoy your little cretin-filled utopia. But chances are if they don't "like" you, you won't last long there and their requirements for "likeability" swing back and forth like a woman's mood. People that have been banned here at TSM post freely at WDI and are liked...people that have been banned at WDI post freely here at TSM and are liked. What's that tell you about the banning process at both boards? Inconsistent would be the word. In closing, it's not really I who lost out in that particular "relationship" anyhow, WDI did, so actually good riddance. They did me a favor. I posted there and here out of boredom and convenience, not because it was actually FUN to do. I wish I was banned here because that would prevent me from seeing all the stupid shit that goes on here, too. That's how I felt about my ban from WDI. Not being able to go there or view the board saves me from having to do what it is I do. At any rate, SNKT II (hell, SNKT v.1) is a way better board than WDI (ANY version) could EVER be and there your membership status doesn't depend on whether me and my clique "like you" or not. We're not women so we don't act like'em. You're free to be yourself at SNKT II even if yourself is an asshole. Last I checked there wasn't any law against that. And MY COCK IS BIGGER THAN EVERYONE'S HERE.
Ripper Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 well uh....fine you win. not like I have a problem with you anyway CJ. I thought you deserved the banning at WDI but I always enjoyed talking to you in the WDI Chats and when SS:2 launches I'll be a dedicated poster...unless you'd rather I not. You thought I deserved to be banned? For what? For daring to oppose a WDI admin in the one place where he doesn't have to make an argument and rather can ban me because he doesn't "like me"? That's ghey. A few of the WDI admins have never liked me and that's fine. But to get banned because of it isn't fair at all. I know it's their board and their prerogative, but to ban someone because your personalities don't mix is fucking pathetic. Hey, that's life. If you work with someone you don't like, you can't ban them from work. You either choose not to socialize with them or you deal with them only when you have to. Only 'net nerds abuse their "power" and simply push buttons to eliminate a "problem." I probably won't like everyone who posts at SNKT II, but that doesn't mean I'm going to let my personal biases influence any decision I make that has to do with them. Unless someone is basically being a Prince Paul, I've never even seen the need to ban someone from a messageboard. When you're banning people for what they say; words on a screen, you're taking yourself and your board way too seriously. The Powers That Be at WDI believe that I am an "act"; that I'm controversial, obnoxious, outspoken and provocative just for the sake of being so. I'm not, it's just how I am. And they ban me for it because basically they can. Having a personality that differs from theirs is a banworthy offense, it seems. They constructed a little net world where they make the rules, probably to deal with the fact that they can't control much outside of it. Fine. I'm not angry at that; enjoy your little cretin-filled utopia. But chances are if they don't "like" you, you won't last long there and their requirements for "likeability" swing back and forth like a woman's mood. People that have been banned here at TSM post freely at WDI and are liked...people that have been banned at WDI post freely here at TSM and are liked. What's that tell you about the banning process at both boards? Inconsistent would be the word. In closing, it's not really I who lost out in that particular "relationship" anyhow, WDI did, so actually good riddance. They did me a favor. I posted there and here out of boredom, not because it was actually FUN to do. I wish I was banned here because that would prevent me from seeing all the stupid shit that goes on here, too. That's how I felt about my ban from WDI. Not being able to go there or view the board saves me from having to do what it is I do. At any rate, SNKT II (hell, SNKT v.1) is a way better board than WDI (ANY version) could EVER be and there your membership status doesn't depend on whether me and my clique "like you" or not. We're not women so we don't act like'em. You're free to be yourself at SNKT II even if yourself is an asshole. Last I checked there wasn't any law against that. And MY COCK IS BIGGER THAN EVERYONE'S HERE. Not about to post in the cock shots thread, but don't be so sure MISTA...
Guest The Old Me Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 And MY COCK IS BIGGER THAN EVERYONE'S HERE. BLASPHEMY! Go to the thread and prove it then!
Guest Crucifixio Jones Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 I don't think everyone's monitor could accomodate the snapshot.
Ripper Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 I would but I hate proving stereotypes. ... Think about it... .... ... Think about it...
Guest Crucifixio Jones Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 I'm with Ripper. The myth is not a myth.
Guest The Old Me Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 ::still thinking...not getting:: Oh! You guys are jewish and not cirumsized!
Guest The Old Me Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 ...white you know you're in the right?
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 I thought you deserved to be banned from what I was told by Dutch and others. I wasn't a witness to most of it. If I'm wrong then I'm sorry. I like WDI but I don't post there often. I like TSM because you can act like a dumbass here and be worshipped as some kind of postwhoring god.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 *avoids drama* wow, that actually feels kinda nice.
Guest Crucifixio Jones Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 If I were you, Banky, I'd avoid the cock-size drama, too. We all know what you're trying to make up for when you're such an attention whore.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 If I were you, Banky, I'd avoid the cock-size drama, too. We all know what you're trying to make up for when you're such an attention whore. Yea, so, I have a small penis...whats your point?
Guest The Old Me Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 If I were you, Banky, I'd avoid the cock-size drama, too. We all know what you're trying to make up for when you're such an attention whore. Eh. Nothing wrong with shilling one of the greatest, most innovative threads of all time.
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 I'm glad that I don't go into that folder.
Guest Crucifixio Jones Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 Only TSM's most truly dysfuntional posters frequent that folder. Which means EVERYONE goes there. Don't lie, CWM. You go, too. And btw, I thought you deserved to be banned from what I was told by Dutch you thought that his account was going to be unbiased and completely true?
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 I don't go there because I can't. I'm on a work computer here. I live in North B.C. right now in a Logging Camp. I'm an assistant manager for the site so I get a PC but I can't look at anything that might be interrpruted as porn. And I dont know about Unbiased but I've always trusted Dutch. After all he did unban me. And despite his lack of penis he seems to be a good guy-type-thing.
Guest The Old Me Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 I'm glad that I don't go into that folder. Don't fear the cock thread. It loves you.
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 ::Worships CWM:: See?!? thanks Zack.
Zack Malibu Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 Hey, no problem. How often do a preppy East Coast kid and a drunken Canadian lumberjack get along? The hilarity is just BEGGING for a sitcom!
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 Hey, no problem. How often do a preppy East Coast kid and a drunken Canadian lumberjack get along? The hilarity is just BEGGING for a sitcom! Toss in Agnes and Mario as our kooky neighbors and it'd be GOLD
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 CJ has a case, CWM, his banning was iffy at best.
Zack Malibu Posted August 8, 2003 Report Posted August 8, 2003 Agnes is actually moving back to Massachusetts next week, which makes him about an hour from me. We're gonna be going to the Ring of Honor show. I'll have to videotape this and mail it to ya.
Guest TheGame2705 Posted August 9, 2003 Report Posted August 9, 2003 I'm so confused, so torn. On one hand, everything CJ says is true... on the other, he haterized on me for no reason...
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted August 9, 2003 Report Posted August 9, 2003 I'm so confused, so torn. On one hand, everything CJ says is true... on the other, he haterized on me for no reason... Never use the word haterize again. Please.
Guest Boo_Bradley Posted August 9, 2003 Report Posted August 9, 2003 *scratches head and leaves* love the gimmick!!!
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted August 9, 2003 Report Posted August 9, 2003 I'm so confused, so torn. On one hand, everything CJ says is true... on the other, he haterized on me for no reason... there was a reason. there's always a reason to "haterize" you.
The Thread Killer Posted August 9, 2003 Report Posted August 9, 2003 With all due respect to Mr. Jones, having The Game on his side doesn't help his argument much. It would probably be better for him if The Game was against his banning, or at least remained silent on the issue. Suffice it to say, while there was some controversy and feelings of regret expressed around the banning of Crucifixio Jones from WDI, there was NONE around the banning of The Game, nor will there ever be.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now