Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 I'm an angry, annoyed wrestling fan here. I'm sooo tired of the rediculous amounts of over praise these two get. They're both flawed and there are many better wrestlers. I'M NOT SAYING THEY'RE BAD, so don't go there. Which man is MORE overrated?
CanadianChick Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Jesus, what a riduculous topic. And Shawn will obviously win. Kurt Angle is the internet god right now.
JHawk Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Probably Shawn since Angle's never thrown a hissyfit during a match that I can recall. But I refuse to formally vote because I love most of their matches.
Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Jesus, what a riduculous topic. Why? I would like a long, detailed explanation please. And Shawn will obviously win. Kurt Angle is the internet god right now. And that's why he's so overrated.
CanadianChick Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 You want to know why this topic is stupid? You're asking which of two great wrestlers is more over-rated. Who cares which wrestler others over-rate? Why should other people's opinion effect the greatness of wrestlers? I just find it pretty funny that people are nitpicking to bring up the negatives of good wrestlers. Another reason why this topic is stupid is that it is pretty obvious who will win. As I stated before, 'over-rated' or not, Angle is thought of very highly on this board in particular. Micheals, for some reason, isnt'. Thus, Micheals will get more votes. Duh.
Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 You want to know why this topic is stupid? You're asking which of two great wrestlers is more over-rated. Who cares which wrestler others over-rate? I care. They're not just overrated, they're ridiculously overrated. It's almost scary to see how overrated these two are. Why should other people's opinion effect the greatness of wrestlers? Who said it did? I rate a wrestler on his matches, not what people think of him. Based on the quality of their matches, I can safely say they don't deserve the amounts of praise they get. There are simply better wrestlers and better matches. I just find it pretty funny that people are nitpicking to bring up the negatives of good wrestlers. It's called debating . People claim a wrestler is great or the best, so one brings up negatives to prove them wrong. If someone says wrestler A is better than wrestler B, I will point out why wrestler A isn't better.
Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Another reason why this topic is stupid is that it is pretty obvious who will win. As I stated before, 'over-rated' or not, Angle is thought of very highly on this board in particular. Micheals, for some reason, isnt'. Thus, Micheals will get more votes. Duh. I'm not asking who is better, so.... If Angle is thought of highly and Michaels isn't, then Angle is the more overrated.
CanadianChick Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 No, more people here will say that Micheals is more overrated because they don't think he is a good wrestler. Most people like Kurt and think he's the best wrestler in WWE. Why would they say he's overrated?
Lord of The Curry Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Right now, Angle. Off all time, HBK.
Betty Houle Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 These two are rated just as they are. There's no "overating" being done. Therefore I'll pass on voting.
Guest BAR Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Well, from what I've seen of Angle. He delivers the goods. Definately not one of the greatest of all time, though. So, I vote HBK. Even though he has put on some ****+ matches. He can't hold a candle to (e.g.) Toshiaki Kawada.
Guest oxymoron Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 HBK, the most overrated wrestler ever.
Betty Houle Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 I vote for either Ricky Steamboat, Lou Thesz, Bret Hart, or Ric Flair.
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 (edited) I vote for either Ricky Steamboat, Lou Thesz, Bret Hart, or Ric Flair. gotta love stupidity...... Edited August 21, 2003 by dynamite1980
bob_barron Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 gotta love suptidity...... Pot-kettle-black
Lord of The Curry Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Anybody who DOESN'T think that Flair is one of the most overrated of all time seriously needs to check themself. Since when did wrestling the same match for 30 years qualify one as the best?
Betty Houle Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 I vote for either Ricky Steamboat, Lou Thesz, Bret Hart, or Ric Flair. gotta love stupidity...... My post was actually FREAKIN' HILARIOUS. Nothing short of brilliant.
Youth N Asia Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Michaels...he's a good worker, and could work a crowd great, but as a champ he was just so so.
Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 These two are rated just as they are. There's no "overating" being done. Therefore I'll pass on voting. Yes, there is. Go in the WWE forum, where Michaels is rated higher than Guerrero for his work over the past year, even though Shawn has had only ONE great match, and Guerrero having MANY. That's just one example....
CanadianChick Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 By one person, Ray. Only one person said that.
CanadianChris Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 These two are rated just as they are. There's no "overating" being done. Therefore I'll pass on voting. Yes, there is. Go in the WWE forum, where Michaels is rated higher than Guerrero for his work over the past year, even though Shawn has had only ONE great match, and Guerrero having MANY. That's just one example.... Yes, the WWE forum being the bastion of thoughtful discussion and well-reasoned arguments that it is. No one with two brain cells to rub together would even think that, let alone say it.
Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 By one person, Ray. Only one person said that. Yes, only one person said that, because it's an example. Michaels is overrated by many people, all over the place.
bob_barron Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 You're acting like everyone in WWE folder is blowing their load over HBK rather then Guerrero. It's just one guy whose proven himself to be not too bright. Someone has a different opinion then you- Get over it
bob_barron Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Yes it is. Some people like Shawn, others don't. Some people like Angle, others don't
CanadianChris Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 It's not a matter of "opinion." EVERYTHING is a matter of opinion around here.
Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 Liking a wrestler is different than a wrestler being good. If Shawn no-sells.....it's not "opinion" to say he no-sells. If you don't mind no-selling, that's fine.
bob_barron Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 There ya go- What makes a good match is total OPINION.
Guest Ray Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 There ya go- What makes a good match is total OPINION. Yeah.....I guess so. My opinion is both men are good but overrated.
bob_barron Posted August 21, 2003 Report Posted August 21, 2003 (edited) I got your point after the first emoticon thanks. I understand that it's your opinion but you're raising a big stink over something ONE GUY said. Get over it Edited August 21, 2003 by bob_barron
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now