Guest Eagan469 Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 Would it be possible to enable a feature that restricts us to posting once every 30 seconds? It would help prevent spamming.
the max Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 No, it would delay spamming by 30 seconds.
Guest Eagan469 Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 No, it would delay spamming by 30 seconds. which would deter people from doing it
bob_barron Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 It would just make PP's posts 30 seconds apart rather then 5 seconds apart. I'm against it
Art Sandusky Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 No, it would delay spamming by 30 seconds. which would deter people from doing it ... for 30 seconds.
Perfxion Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 Why not a rule that if you keep fucking attention whores you get banned. It might force some people to shut up about these people.
Fökai Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 Isn't there already a "flood restriction" feature already enabled on this board? (unless AC and Dames removed it during the last board update) I KNOW there's a feature similar to this when using the "Search" option, with a 20 second buffer.
Guest Eagan469 Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 Why not a rule that if you keep fucking attention whores you get banned. It might force some people to shut up about these people. so...you're against the 30 second feature?
Bruiser Chong Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I remember back at the old Smarks board you couldn't post twice in less than 60 seconds. I don't think it'd stop trolling and spamming, but it'd sure cut down on the damage that could be done. PP had what, like 300 posts the other night? That would have been a lot less trash to clean up if he hadn't been able to post as much as he wanted in short periods of time.
LaParkaYourCar Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 No, it would delay spamming by 30 seconds. which would deter people from doing it I seriously doubt they're going to say, "oh damn I can't post for 30 seconds I might as well quit."
Art Sandusky Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 (edited) Spoon, me and you are cool and all, but that's just wrong, man. Consider this a warning. Edited August 27, 2003 by AlwaysPissedOff
Insane Bump Machine Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I remember back at the old Smarks board you couldn't post twice in less than 60 seconds. I don't think it'd stop trolling and spamming, but it'd sure cut down on the damage that could be done. PP had what, like 300 posts the other night? That would have been a lot less trash to clean up if he hadn't been able to post as much as he wanted in short periods of time. Normally you can delete all posts a user has made with a couple of mouse clicks. Don't know about this board system though.
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 A 30 second feature would take all the fun out of the OAO threads, as well as ruining my quick wit. It's the only thing I have
caboose Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 BUT IT ONLY TAKES ME 30 SECONDS TO DO MOLES MOMMY SHES SO COLD AND DEAD SEXY AND HER HEAD GOES POW What the fuck?!
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I would say that if Prince Paul can get banned for saying stuff like that, Kotz should at least get a warning and have that post deleted.
Art Sandusky Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I was showing how the post delay thing doesn't stop people from being offensive or trolling. I offically give myself a warning. (aw, made you look, you a slave to a page in my rhyme book)
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I was showing how the post delay thing doesn't stop people from being offensive or trolling. Still though, dude. Wrongfull.
Art Sandusky Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I see what you say, then look at your avatar, looking all sullen and stuff, and I laugh. Sorry, it's akin to imagining AJ Styles operatically belting out whatever Game says because he's in his sig.
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 (edited) Don't worry, I'm not a goth... And I'm aware that looks equally stupid next to my avatar. Edited August 28, 2003 by chave
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 It wouldn't stop anything and would slow down good conversations...even if only fractionally.
The Czech Republic Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 I see what you say, then look at your avatar, looking all sullen and stuff, and I laugh. Sorry, it's akin to imagining AJ Styles operatically belting out whatever Game says because he's in his sig. Yeah, AJ Styles talking about eating ass hair from his "man," thanks Kotz
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now