Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Tully316

Good Music/Bad Music decade theory

Recommended Posts

I've had this theory that 10 years of good groundbreaking music is followed by 10 years of crap.

 

Now, this is not absolute, but let me see if I can explain it.

 

1965 - 1975: Stones, Beatles, Zeppelin, Motown (GOOD)

 

1975 - 1985: Disco, New Wave, etc. (CRAP)

 

1985 - 1995: G'n R, U2, Nirvana, Grunge/Alt rock, 2pac (GOOD)

 

1995 - 2005: Boy Bands, pop punk, weak rap (CRAP)

 

Granted, there are some good music in the crap periods (Pink Floyd), but the 65-75 and 85-95 periods had some absolutely GREAT music.

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Plushy Al Logan
1975 - 1985:  Disco, New Wave, etc.  (CRAP)

I disagree here. What about Black sabbath, Van Halen, AC/DC, and Disco does not suck.

 

1985 - 1995:  G'n R, U2, Nirvana, Grunge/Alt rock, 2pac  (GOOD)

 

What is Alternative anyway? The only good Grunge ACT was Pearl Jam. Rap is crap. What about Hair bands, and this was also the era of good Metallica.

 

David Lee Roth > Kurt Cobain

Lita ford>Tawny Kitaen>Bret Michaels>Any '80's groupie>Vince Neil>Courtney Love

 

Yes, I feind Vince Neil more attractive than Counrtney Love, and I'm not even gay.

 

I have news for you. Eddie Vedder ripped off David Coverdale, who in turn ripped off Robert Plant who wasn't even that great live any way. So...

Coverdale>Hagar>Plant>Vedder

Edited by Plushy Al Logan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to jump on the bandwagon, but your post lost a ton of credibility from me when you said that 85-95 was better than 75-85. The only era worse than 85-95 was 95-present. I'll take punk rock, hardcore, the beginning of the metal scene, AC/DC at their best, and new wave over 2Pac, grunge, and all the other crap that existed in the late 80s & early 90s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have news for you. Eddie Vedder ripped off David Coverdale, who in turn ripped off Robert Plant who wasn't even that great live any way. So...

Coverdale>Hagar>Plant>Vedder

Whaaaaaaat? I get the "Coverdale ripping off Page" part, but "Vedder ripping off Coverdale"? Whuh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a pretty silly theory. There's so much music in every era that you're never going to find some arbitrary 10 years that blow.

 

I like what happened in the second half of the 90's a lot more than what happened in the early 90's, for what it's worth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

late 80s/early 90s had the pixies, r.e.m., rage against the machine, ween, nine inch nails, beastie boys, portishead, liz phair, tori amos, smashing pumpkins, bjork, jeff buckley, and sonic youth. so why do all the grunge-haters dwell on the grunge in the early 90s when there was so much other stuff going on?

 

and i find it funny that the ENTIRE PUNK MOVEMENT got passed over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'll be the first to admit that some very good music came during the decades i labeled as "crap", but I was looking at some of the great albums that came out during those "good" decades.

 

For instance: some have said that 85-95 is crap, but look at the great albums that came out during that timeframe:

 

GnR - Appetite for Destruction, UYI 1 & 2

U2 - Joshua Tree, Rattle and Hum, Achtung baby

Pearl Jam - Ten

Nirvana - Nevermind

Counting Crows - August and Everything After

Singles soundtrack

PE - Fear of a Black Planet

Smashing pumpkins - Siamese Dream, Mellon Collie

 

 

Now I loved alot of thigns that came out between 75-85 like Aerosmith, Cars, Eagles and such, but I think that more "defining" or "landmark" albums came out during the good decades I labeled.

 

Anyways, just one man's opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's a pretty silly theory. There's so much music in every era that you're never going to find some arbitrary 10 years that blow.

That's what I would have said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Choken One
late 80s/early 90s had the pixies, r.e.m., rage against the machine, ween, nine inch nails, beastie boys, portishead, liz phair, tori amos, smashing pumpkins, bjork, jeff buckley, and sonic youth. so why do all the grunge-haters dwell on the grunge in the early 90s when there was so much other stuff going on?

 

and i find it funny that the ENTIRE PUNK MOVEMENT got passed over.

The real punk movement lasted for about 4 weeks in 1977 and then it just became another fashion statement like Disco.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had Portishead on the brain too. Are they ever coming out with anything else, or is Beth Gibbons just going to keep doing mediocre work with Rustin Man? I'd heard rumblings about a new album for the beginning of this year, but that obviously didn't happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've heard tell that gibbons & darrow have been on rocky ground for years, and they seemed to have been pretty burned out by the time their second album came out. so i wouldn't expect a new album from them in the next...well, ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Doyo
1975 - 1985: Disco, New Wave, etc. (CRAP)

 

B-) , people think of disco and the early mtv videos with the weird hair and automatically label

this period as crap, but you had Rush, Kiss, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Motorhead, AC/DC,

Van Halen, Cheap Trick, Queen, Heart, Dire Straits, Pink Floyd, The Police, Blondie, Talking Heads,

Fleetwood Mac, Eagles, Billy Joel, Elton John, John Mellencamp, Willie Nelson, Hank Williams Jr,

Bob Marley, Metallica, Rainbow, Dio, U2, R.E.M., Depeche Mode, , Bob Seger, Steve

Miller, Prince, The Cars, David Bowie, Elvis Costello, solo stuff from the Beatles members,

Joe Jackson, Pretenders....... And there was also the rise of rap, punk, techno and industrial music.

I think that is a major problem of today - there are no new styles of music being invented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with one thing,

 

95 to Present is probably the weakest of all those eras (not to say good music hasn't been made in that time peroid, just not enough of it when in comparison to the others)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Landmark albums that came out between 1975-1985.

 

Born to Run by Bruce Springsteen

Born in the USA by Springsteen

The Clash's self title debut and London Calling

Blood on the Tracks by Bob Dylan

Songs in the Key of Life by Stevie Wonder

Frampton Comes Alive

Live Bullet by Bob Seger

Captain Fantastic and the Dirt Brown Cowboy by Elton John

Never Mind the Bullocks by the Sex Pistols

Off the Wall, Beat it and Thriller by Michael Jackson

Purple Rain by Prince

Rumours by Fleetwood Mac

My Aim is True by Elvis Costello

Synchronisty by the Police

Hotel California by the Eagles

Sports by Huey Lewis and the News

The Last Waltz by the Band

Brothers in Arms by Dire Straits

The Smiths self titles debut

The Stranger by Billy Joel

Bat Out of Hell by Meatloaf

 

I can go on...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This theory is so flawed because alot of crap came out in the good time peroids, and alot of good came out in the Bad time peroids. This whole thing is a crock of shit. You can name so many good albums to come out all over this time peroid and this only looks at what, heavy/Alt. rock? Because other genres existed. It may not be maystream, but alot of good comes out all over the place. Just because your style of rock isn't big, doesn't mean that era sucks(IE: right now).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, according to this, 1955-1965 must have been pretty bad.

 

But yes, I disagree totally. Early 80s was a great time for music, much better than the early 90s. How sick are you, to think New Wave is crap!? My god, man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Er, interesting theory...

 

There's always been good music out there, you just have to look. And to some extent, that's always been the case, despite what most modern documentation of musical history would have us believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Plushy Al Logan
I have news for you.  Eddie Vedder ripped off David Coverdale, who in turn ripped off Robert Plant who wasn't even that great live any way.  So...

Coverdale>Hagar>Plant>Vedder

Whaaaaaaat? I get the "Coverdale ripping off Page" part, but "Vedder ripping off Coverdale"? Whuh?

I first heard Pearl Jam when I was seven or eight. To me I honestly thought that Coverdale stopped doing the Tarzan yell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×