1234-5678 Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Some of us are morons because we admit Austin/Vince or Triple H/Foley sound like a good matches? They're both much more appealing then........... Orton vs. Anybody except HBK Jindrak and Cade vs. La Resistance The Basham Bros. vs. Anybody Any matches involving Nathan Jones, Bautista, John Heindenrich, The Cat........should I continue?
Lil' Bitch Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Unless Foley goes over this time, I don't see the point.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Does anyone think the Taker will actually lose at WM? Ha-ha-ha.
Guest RollingSambos Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I seriously doubt that Heidenreich or The Cat will make the card. The Bashams and La Resistance are also not Mania material, IMO. Batista might.
Guest Choken One Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 WWE Title Match Brock Lesnar Vs John Cena World Title Match Triple H Vs Randy Orton The Undertaker Vs Kane Bill Goldberg Vs Steve Austin Chris Benoit Vs Chris Jericho Kurt Angle Vs HBK Eddy Guerrero Vs Rob Van Dam I.C Title Match Matt Hardy Vs Booker T Edge Vs Christian Mick Foley Vs Mr. McMahon Woman's title Match Lita Vs Molly Vs Trish Vs Victoria Cruiserweight Title Match Mysterio Vs Knoble Vs Tajiri Vs Dragon WWE Tag Title Match Paul London and Spanky Vs W.G.T.T World Tag Title Match Val Venis and Lance Storm Vs Rene Dupree and Rob Conway Battle Royale The Big Show Rikishi Holly Doug Basham Danny Basham Sean O Haire A-Train Nunzio Orlando Jordan The Cat Dvon Dudley Buh Buh Dudley Dreamer Jyndrak Cade Steiner Test Rosey Hurricane Mark Henry If Foley HAS to be on the show...Stick him with McMahon, as it'll give Vince a fucking slot on the card and HE HAS TO HAVE ONE ya know...Foley can finally his one up on vince that he never got. HHH/Foley been driven to the ground.
Guest RollingSambos Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I will admit that HHH vs. Foley would probably suck...Foley is really out of shape and has 4 years of ring rust, and HHH is a shell of the worker that he used to be.
Slayer Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 5 hours? Here's what I bet happens 1 hour devoted to nostaliga bits, fair enough 1 hour will be devoted to all the matches smarks want to see. All these matches will be given 5 minutes at most. 3 remaining hours for marathon matches of the smarks' true favorites... you know who I mean
geniusMoment Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Are you guys forgetting how good of an ass-kicking Foley took from HHH this past summer. In one night Foley had me dreaming about that match again. You guys are nuts. I will stake my life on the fact that at Mania in his comeback at MSG Foley could have a good match with Nathan Jones.
Lil' Bitch Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I don't think Cena will be headlining WM.
Guest Besus Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I can watch 2 of Kane/Taker matches on tape. Maybe it's just me but I dont wana see Austin/Vince again. HHH/Foley again? Damn. Goldberg/Lesnar could be decent. Im still not interested in either match.
deancoles Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Ric Flair will probably miss mania unless Sting signs.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Why dont they just do another WM 2000 thing and do an all day look back at all the PPVs instead of filling up the PPV time with video flashbacks. The crowd will be dead after sitting through all of the flashbacks.
Guest Choken One Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 He wasn't on it last year and still stole the show from Booka (which a fucking monkey could) and HHH.
Brocklock Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Ric Flair will probably miss mania unless Sting signs. Knowing the WWE they'll probably feed Flair to Orton.
Guest Choken One Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Orton gets HHH or Rock. The rock is likely best anyways...He can make Orton a star if REALLY tries... That means we can have Angle/HBK.
Guest JMA Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I REALLY don't wanna see Lesnar vs. Goldberg. It's just another "dream" match that will turn out bad. Lesnar is superior to Goldberg in every way. It would expose Bill to be in the same ring with Brock. Keep McMahon OUT of wrestling matches. Period. As for Foley, he shouldn't be facing Triple H. He's been retired for a while now. Make the stipulation mean something. Kane vs. Taker MIGHT be okay.
Jack_Bauer Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 As for the Foley v HHH thing, someone said that Foley should go over. WHY should he ? If it was Chris Benoit in there instead, people would say Benoit should go over, and would then use the 'Foley's retired and shouldnt go over an active wrestler' excuse. Fact is that Triple H is an active member of the roster and there is no way that someone who probably wont be back after WM should beat someone who is likely to be around for a while. As for the 5 hour thing, I'm all for it, as it gives them a chance to provide for the smarks AND the marks. Get some nostalgia in there and get some AWESOME wrestling in there. It's not as if there isn't enough time to do it in.
Lil' Bitch Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 As for the Foley v HHH thing, someone said that Foley should go over. WHY should he ? Because HHH beat him THREE times in a row on PPVs last time. A 4th win for HHH would be fucking pointless.
Guest RollingSambos Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 No one is paying to see Kane vs. Taker based on the sheer workrate. They are paying to see the return of the Dead Man.
Jack_Bauer Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 As for the Foley v HHH thing, someone said that Foley should go over. WHY should he ? Because HHH beat him THREE times in a row on PPVs last time. A 4th win for HHH would be fucking pointless. And a Foley win would have a point ?
Downhome Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Fuck nostalgia. The WWE should make NO mention to the history of WM at WM 20 and use it to spotlight/pass the torch to the midcard guys who should be main eventing but not do to bullshit politics ala WM 10............ This is quite possibly the stupidest and most closed minded thing I've ever read in this forum.
Lil' Bitch Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Foley should at least get the final win (his JOB back) plus it would please fans.
Downhome Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 As for the Foley v HHH thing, someone said that Foley should go over. WHY should he ? Because HHH beat him THREE times in a row on PPVs last time. A 4th win for HHH would be fucking pointless. And a Foley win would have a point ? If you can't see the point in that, then you don't deserve having it explained to you. I'm getting sick and tired of "smarks" thinking that every match SHOULD put over a young guy, and that there is no place for nostalgia anymore. I really am.
Downhome Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Foley should at least get the final win (his JOB back) plus it would please fans. Exactly. The fans will be so fucking into the match, they'll go crazy when Foley finally overcomes HHH.
Guest RollingSambos Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 We shouldn't be sweating this because HHH vs. Orton or HHH vs. Foley isn't as set in stone as say, Kane vs. Undertaker. I mean, if you think about it, they've teased a Foley vs. Orton match more than anything. We really won't know where they are going until like December/January.
Downhome Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 Even then it's hard to tell where they are going at times. Hell, they might just wait a few weeks before the WM show to promote for anything, just to piss us off.
Lil' Bitch Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I'm not surprised by the news though. After all, they considered replacing Goldberg with Foley for the SS ME.
geniusMoment Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I remember when piper went out on top a wrestlemania 3. It was such a good moment. Why can't some of you just be happy that it is a good moment and enjoy it. The more good moments the WWE creates the more fans will return.
Jack_Bauer Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 I remember when piper went out on top a wrestlemania 3. It was such a good moment. Why can't some of you just be happy that it is a good moment and enjoy it. The more good moments the WWE creates the more fans will return. Believe me, I WOULD enjoy Foley going over, but the thing that annoys me is that if it was someone that people on here liked, people would say that Foley should job. Also, Piper lost the match and went out on a high.
geniusMoment Posted November 22, 2003 Report Posted November 22, 2003 To me the job is not important. By going out on top I mean going over on HHH. It doesn't have to be by pin.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now