JN News 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 You guys are not gonna believe the stupidity of the WWE or their website. As we all know, and as we all saw plain as broad daylight, Goldberg won his match against HHH by DQ. It happened when Kane came in and attacked Goldberg, causing the DQ. (and let's not kid ourselves either, because obviously Kane's interference was the obviously planned outcome of the match) Kane DID NOT attack HHH in any way, shape or form. That would've ended up as a draw. (Double DQ) Now, WWE.com is saying for some reason that it was a no contest. I mean, what's going on here? Is Vince McSenile trying to cover the whole thing up and make everyone believe that Goldberg didn't technically win the match tonight? Are they purposely trying to insult our intellegence again like they've been doing for the past couple of years now? What gives? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Fook Report post Posted November 25, 2003 I think you're just reading too much into it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JN News 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 I think you're just reading too much into it. Maybe. But, I'm just saying that the WWE & their website are distorting the facts, here. JMO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 Finally, a burial we can all get behind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mulatto Heat Report post Posted November 25, 2003 Speaking of wwe.com flubs, I like how the link just below the Orton picture is wrong. And the headline "Y2J nails..... HBK" with HBK on all fours is just.... never mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 Perhaps it's an intentional error so you can get a ShopZone discount... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Goodear Report post Posted November 25, 2003 Because they want you to understand that Triple H didn't want Kane to run in and build heat for the triple threat. It's not rocket science there buddy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 Yeah, it's a big conspiracy. Apparently the match outcomes are pre-determined, as well! *gasp* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ligerbomb03 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 The outcome of matches is predetermined? My world has been shattered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 It is kind of screwy though that the match is a no contest though HHH clearly lost...*gasp*...I think they're trying to protect someone! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 It is kind of screwy though that the match is a no contest though HHH clearly lost...*gasp*...I think they're trying to protect someone! Yes, because I'm so sure that they'd make it THAT frigging obvious. Someone screwed up in that match *cough*timekeeper*cough* and rang the bell early. All was lost after that point, so calling it a no contest and arguing over the decision is a moot point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steviekick 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 It is kind of screwy though that the match is a no contest though HHH clearly lost...*gasp*...I think they're trying to protect someone! Maybe they went with the no-contest decision to keep the Gberg/HHH feud still fresh? If Gberg went over Trips again it would j ust make the main event at Armageddon seem all the more sucky. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted November 25, 2003 Actually, it would have made the match more dire for Goldberg. HHH had him beat and Kane makes the save, therefore saying it was a DQ win for Goldberg when Trips was going to win seems like it would add more. Kane didn't touch Triple H so it should have been a DQ with Trips complaining he had Goldberg beat in the middle of the ring for the title, thus building the heat with Kane and HHH. The no contest is just another flub by the brillant WWE website. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 26, 2003 I think you're just reading too much into it. Maybe. But, I'm just saying that the WWE & their website are distorting the facts, here. JMO OMG --- A company specializing in pre-determined matches said that a match ended in a way we don't remember! CONSPIRACY! -=Mike ...Seriously, who cares? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 26, 2003 It is kind of screwy though that the match is a no contest though HHH clearly lost...*gasp*...I think they're trying to protect someone! It does seem a little odd to protect him in a website, rather than on TELEVISION, which likely was seen by considerably more people. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Oh he was protected plenty on TV. They were screaming about how he won the match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CronoT Report post Posted November 26, 2003 You know Levesque is going to get that time keeper fired or demoted/replaced. I can just see it now: Levesque: "You know, Dad, (Vince) I just don't think that (Time Keeper's name) is ready yet. He/she needs some more time before he's/she's ready for the big time." Vince: "You know, I think you might be right, Jean. I'll look into it." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Why are you calling him Levesque? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CronoT Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Why are you calling him Levesque? Gee, I don't know...maybe because it's his name. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Why are you calling him Levesque? Gee, I don't know...maybe because it's his name. Yet everyone calls him HHH. You don't see anyone on here.... "Man did you see that confrontation between Jay Reso and Chris Irvine!? Amy Dumas was there to!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Why are you calling him Levesque? Gee, I don't know...maybe because it's his name. Yet everyone calls him HHH. You don't see anyone on here.... "Man did you see that confrontation between Jay Reso and Chris Irvine!? Amy Dumas was there to!" I usually refer to him as "Levesque" to be derisive or mocking, personally Same with "Callaway" for Underbiker Those're the only two I do that with Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Megatron Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Yet everyone calls him HHH. You don't see anyone on here.... "Man did you see that confrontation between Jay Reso and Chris Irvine!? Amy Dumas was there to!" I think he does that because most of us on here know his real name. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Yet everyone calls him HHH. You don't see anyone on here.... "Man did you see that confrontation between Jay Reso and Chris Irvine!? Amy Dumas was there to!" I think he does that because most of us on here know his real name. Everyone knows pretty much all of the popular wrestlers names. People only do it to seem knowledgable but come off just looking dumb. Call them by there fucking wrestling name...everyone else does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Settle down, "Billy Bob" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Settle down, "Billy Bob" I HAVE SAND IN MY VAGINA AND IT'S ANNOYING ME! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 I'm not sure which is funnier: Chiding each other over using wrestler's real names, or the fact that few of us ever use our real names here Think about that one Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CronoT Report post Posted November 26, 2003 I call him Levesque, and not HHH or Triple H, because there's no longer any clear delineation between his real self and his wrestler persona. Once that happens, it's time to step back and take some time off. I don't think we need someone else ending up like Ultimate Warrior. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 I'm not sure which is funnier: Chiding each other over using wrestler's real names, or the fact that few of us ever use our real names here Think about that one Just like in the vein of the wrestlers we bitch about...we choose to hide our real names out of embarassment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted November 26, 2003 I'm not sure which is funnier: Chiding each other over using wrestler's real names, or the fact that few of us ever use our real names here Think about that one Just like in the vein of the wrestlers we bitch about...we choose to hide our real names out of embarassment. I don't really hide mine out of embarassment, no one's ever really asked for it Though I do happen to share the last name of a superstar (no not this one), although it isn't really his last name... but still Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RollingSambos Report post Posted November 26, 2003 Denies that Goldberg won by DQ? I think not. The truth is that it was a no contest. The referee and the time keeper were doing their own thing. Chioda never disqualified Triple H because Randy Orton never touched Goldberg. Goldberg made sure of that. The time keeper simply assumed that Orton storming the ring constituted a DQ, when it did not. Kane's violent interruption ensured that the referee had no choice but to throw the match out. What do you call a match with no clear winner? A no contest. This contest will be decided at Armageddon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
