EdwardKnoxII Posted February 19, 2004 Report Posted February 19, 2004 WWE Weekend Ratings & RAW Details More ratings news... - RAW did a 3.8 rating off hours of 3.6 and 3.9 this week. That is about the same rating as last week. The highest rated segment was a 4.4 for the overrun. - Velocity did a 0.5; Confidential did a 0.5; Heat did a 1.0. Credit: PWInsider.com
Guest Ghettoman Posted February 19, 2004 Report Posted February 19, 2004 Alright, good to know the biggest audience was the one that got to see Triple H standing above all, again.
Michrome Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 Wait...ohmigod...do you mean to tell me that Benoit-Shawn, with nothing on the line, and 1 week of hype, did just as well in the ratings as HHH-Shawn did with 2 weeks of hype and the world title on the line? BURY THE EVIDENCE STAT.
Use Your Illusion Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 *sigh* I wish I was Triple H. UYI
Guest Anglesault Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 What did the World's Most Boring Beatdown get?
razazteca Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 Alright, good to know the biggest audience was the one that got to see Triple H standing above all, again. Austin on an ATV brings the ratings.
JJMc Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 Anybody else think it's time do revamp/ditch Confidential?
ChrisMWaters Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 I still say if Heat and Velocity were better promoted, and maybe had Cruiserweight title matches for Velocity and either IC or Women's title matches on Heat...they'd do better. Oh, and give less recaps of Smackdown and Raw.
MixxMaster Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 Oh, and give less recaps of Smackdown and Raw. Agreed. The amount of time given to the fucking recaps is ABSURD, it takes OVER half the shows...Heat and Velocity both last about 19-23 minutes with all that shit edited out.
Spaceman Spiff Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 Oh, and give less recaps of Smackdown and Raw. Agreed. The amount of time given to the fucking recaps is ABSURD, it takes OVER half the shows...Heat and Velocity both last about 19-23 minutes with all that shit edited out. I started a thread about this (cutting recaps out of Velocity) a while ago, and the common reason for keeping them was for people who don't get UPN. Recaps on Velocity catch them up on major happenings on Smackdown. Myself, I'd prefer to cut them out.
ChrisMWaters Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 Oh, and give less recaps of Smackdown and Raw. Agreed. The amount of time given to the fucking recaps is ABSURD, it takes OVER half the shows...Heat and Velocity both last about 19-23 minutes with all that shit edited out. I started a thread about this (cutting recaps out of Velocity) a while ago, and the common reason for keeping them was for people who don't get UPN. Recaps on Velocity catch them up on major happenings on Smackdown. But that's what Bottom Line and AfterBurn are for.
Guest Ghettoman Posted February 20, 2004 Report Posted February 20, 2004 Try missing a SD and then saying the recaps are worthless, they actually do help all of us who miss a SD here or there and would like to see parts of the matches or how things went down, because no matter what seeing what happened and reading what happened are two different things. And it's not like they don't have a good amount of matches on the show anyway, as they start good, have at least 1 decent middle match and always close with something decent. I guess I just realized there purpose after missing SD a couple times and being glad I got to see what I missed.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now