Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Why did watching Nidia and Molly Holly make me crave bacon? Nidia just flat out looks like a pig - face, tan job, and pot belly included. Molly Holly, while not as pig looking in the face, has a tremendously large ass. And its disgusting. I don't watch women's wrestling for the technical skills. I watch it for fine pieces of ass. I want cheap thrill. See the two little piggies don't do it for me. Terrible, just terrible. How can anyone see them as sex figures?
Guest Anglesault Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Wow, Stuffany McHam segments must feel like a pig roast.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Wow, Stuffany McHam segments must feel like a pig roast. In her case I get wicked flashbacks to the Anna Nicole Smith show.
muzz Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 I agree. 'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast. I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless.
Guest CronoT Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Why did watching Nidia and Molly Holly make me crave bacon? Nidia just flat out looks like a pig - face, tan job, and pot belly included. Molly Holly, while not as pig looking in the face, has a tremendously large ass. And its disgusting. I don't watch women's wrestling for the technical skills. I watch it for fine pieces of ass. I want cheap thrill. See the two little piggies don't do it for me. Terrible, just terrible. How can anyone see them as sex figures? I'll put it as simply as I can, 'trane. Not everyone shares your taste in women.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Why did watching Nidia and Molly Holly make me crave bacon? Nidia just flat out looks like a pig - face, tan job, and pot belly included. Molly Holly, while not as pig looking in the face, has a tremendously large ass. And its disgusting. I don't watch women's wrestling for the technical skills. I watch it for fine pieces of ass. I want cheap thrill. See the two little piggies don't do it for me. Terrible, just terrible. How can anyone see them as sex figures? I'll put it as simply as I can, 'trane. Not everyone shares your taste in women. Just giving my opinion, friend.
Guest pinnacleofallthingsmanly Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Irregardless is not a word.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Irregardless is not a word. ir·re·gard·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-gärdls) adv. Nonstandard Regardless. Bitch.
razazteca Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 You're all breaking the rules y'all should be banned.
AndrewTS Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast. I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless. That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast. I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless. That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper. Shut the fuck up. When the fuck does a post become scrutinized on a message board for using double negatives? You get my point, boys.
Guest AndrewisyourHero Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast. I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless. That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper. Second time- ir·re·gard·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-gärdls) adv. Nonstandard Regardless. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=irregardless Want to try again, my fellow Andrew?
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 They're all just dense.
SamoaRowe Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 I dont' care much for Nidia, but there is nothing wrong with Molly. She's just fine to me.
AndrewTS Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast. I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless. That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper. Second time- ir·re·gard·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-gärdls) adv. Nonstandard Regardless. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=irregardless Want to try again, my fellow Andrew? Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so. This supports your point how?
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. There you go, potsie. Quit trying to sound smart. Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine.
RavishingRickRudo Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 I don't find either of them attractive, but Nidia has this sort of tramp-appeal goin. She's fugly, she knows it, but dammit, she's a desperate woman tryin to look pretty and will skank it up for the attention.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 I don't find either of them attractive, but Nidia has this sort of tramp-appeal goin. She's fugly, she knows it, but dammit, she's a desperate woman tryin to look pretty and will skank it up for the attention. What about the pot belly? I bet she fucks like a balluga whale...blubber flyin/
RavishingRickRudo Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Eh, I'm under the belief that perfection is fantasy and imperfection is beauty. Thus making me absolutely unqualified to speak on the subject
Guest AndrewisyourHero Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. There you go, potsie. Quit trying to sound smart. Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine. He's got you. If he was writing a long essay about the topic, you'd have him, as it is admittedly nonstandard, but it is a word, with it's correct usage being in casual writing.
AndrewTS Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. There you go, potsie. Quit trying to sound smart. Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine. Nonstandard basically means it's still wrong, but it is a popular enough mistake to get its own dictionary entry. See also: "ain't."
Guest AndrewisyourHero Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. There you go, potsie. Quit trying to sound smart. Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine. Nonstandard basically means it's still wrong, but it is a popular enough mistake to get its own dictionary entry. See also: "ain't." This is going to go on..
AndrewTS Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Well, at least there's not l33+ 5|D33|< going on here.
Guest AndrewisyourHero Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 Well, until that outburst anyway
RavishingRickRudo Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 l33+ 5|D33|< Ok, I get the second part, that translates into SPEEK... but what does l33+ mean? BET? LEET?
Guest AndrewisyourHero Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 l33+ 5|D33|< Ok, I get the second part, that translates into SPEEK... but what does l33+ mean? BET? LEET? leet. as in "elite"
AndrewTS Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 l33+ 5|D33|< Ok, I get the second part, that translates into SPEEK... but what does l33+ mean? BET? LEET? Yeah, "leet," as an abbreviated "elite." As used by an "elite hacker" who types in odd combinations of characters vaguely resembling regular text. If there is a more useless skill, I've yet to know of it. As a product of a long line of draconian English teachers and professors, I'm going to take out my anger on those who dare to so blatantly mangle the English language. Stare into the face of Arch Hall Jr.!!
geniusMoment Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 I like Nidias new chest and for some reason she pulls off her look. I don't mind the baby fat around her mid section, watch out if she has a kid, though. She could very well balloon up, as could Molly.
RavishingRickRudo Posted March 30, 2004 Report Posted March 30, 2004 I withdraw the question and lets never speak of it again. I'd rather be clueless to that world. Ok... one more... "Roxors"?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now