Jump to content

Battle of the Swine


Guest The Winter Of My Discontent

Recommended Posts

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted

Why did watching Nidia and Molly Holly make me crave bacon?

 

Nidia just flat out looks like a pig - face, tan job, and pot belly included.

 

Molly Holly, while not as pig looking in the face, has a tremendously large ass. And its disgusting.

 

I don't watch women's wrestling for the technical skills. I watch it for fine pieces of ass. I want cheap thrill. See the two little piggies don't do it for me.

 

Terrible, just terrible. How can anyone see them as sex figures?

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Anglesault
Posted

Wow, Stuffany McHam segments must feel like a pig roast.

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted
Wow, Stuffany McHam segments must feel like a pig roast.

In her case I get wicked flashbacks to the Anna Nicole Smith show.

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted
'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast.

I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless.

Guest CronoT
Posted
Why did watching Nidia and Molly Holly make me crave bacon?

 

Nidia just flat out looks like a pig - face, tan job, and pot belly included.

 

Molly Holly, while not as pig looking in the face, has a tremendously large ass. And its disgusting.

 

I don't watch women's wrestling for the technical skills. I watch it for fine pieces of ass. I want cheap thrill. See the two little piggies don't do it for me.

 

Terrible, just terrible. How can anyone see them as sex figures?

I'll put it as simply as I can, 'trane.

 

Not everyone shares your taste in women.

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted
Why did watching Nidia and Molly Holly make me crave bacon?

 

Nidia just flat out looks like a pig - face, tan job, and pot belly included.

 

Molly Holly, while not as pig looking in the face, has a tremendously large ass.  And its disgusting.

 

I don't watch women's wrestling for the technical skills.  I watch it for fine pieces of ass.  I want cheap thrill.  See the two little piggies don't do it for me. 

 

Terrible, just terrible.  How can anyone see them as sex figures?

I'll put it as simply as I can, 'trane.

 

Not everyone shares your taste in women.

Just giving my opinion, friend.

Guest pinnacleofallthingsmanly
Posted

Irregardless is not a word.

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted
Irregardless is not a word.

ir·re·gard·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-gärdls)

adv. Nonstandard

Regardless.

 

 

Bitch.

Posted
'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast.

I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless.

That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper.

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted
'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast.

I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless.

That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper.

Shut the fuck up. When the fuck does a post become scrutinized on a message board for using double negatives? You get my point, boys.

Guest AndrewisyourHero
Posted
'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast.

I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless.

That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper.

Second time-

 

ir·re·gard·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-gärdls)

adv. Nonstandard

Regardless.

 

 

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=irregardless

 

Want to try again, my fellow Andrew?

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted

They're all just dense.

Posted

I dont' care much for Nidia, but there is nothing wrong with Molly. She's just fine to me.

Posted
'trane on the other hand, must obviously be a sexy beast.

I don't recall showing you my picture, but dare I say you're correct irregardless.

That's not a word. Also, no, morons' use of double negatives doesn't make them proper.

Second time-

 

ir·re·gard·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-gärdls)

adv. Nonstandard

Regardless.

 

 

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=irregardless

 

Want to try again, my fellow Andrew?

Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

 

This supports your point how?

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted
Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing.

There you go, potsie.

 

Quit trying to sound smart.

 

Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine.

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Posted
I don't find either of them attractive, but Nidia has this sort of tramp-appeal goin. She's fugly, she knows it, but dammit, she's a desperate woman tryin to look pretty and will skank it up for the attention.

What about the pot belly? I bet she fucks like a balluga whale...blubber flyin/

Guest AndrewisyourHero
Posted
Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing.

There you go, potsie.

 

Quit trying to sound smart.

 

Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine.

He's got you. If he was writing a long essay about the topic, you'd have him, as it is admittedly nonstandard, but it is a word, with it's correct usage being in casual writing.

Posted
Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing.

There you go, potsie.

 

Quit trying to sound smart.

 

Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine.

Nonstandard basically means it's still wrong, but it is a popular enough mistake to get its own dictionary entry.

 

See also: "ain't."

Guest AndrewisyourHero
Posted
Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing.

There you go, potsie.

 

Quit trying to sound smart.

 

Unless this is an academic website, I think my usage of it was just fine.

Nonstandard basically means it's still wrong, but it is a popular enough mistake to get its own dictionary entry.

 

See also: "ain't."

This is going to go on..

Guest AndrewisyourHero
Posted

Well, until that outburst anyway

Guest AndrewisyourHero
Posted
l33+ 5|D33|<

 

Ok, I get the second part, that translates into SPEEK... but what does l33+ mean? BET? LEET?

leet. as in "elite"

Posted
l33+ 5|D33|<

 

Ok, I get the second part, that translates into SPEEK... but what does l33+ mean?  BET?  LEET?

Yeah, "leet," as an abbreviated "elite." As used by an "elite hacker" who types in odd combinations of characters vaguely resembling regular text. If there is a more useless skill, I've yet to know of it.

 

As a product of a long line of draconian English teachers and professors, I'm going to take out my anger on those who dare to so blatantly mangle the English language.

 

sadist.jpg

 

Stare into the face of Arch Hall Jr.!!

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...