TheBigSwigg Posted April 26, 2004 Report Posted April 26, 2004 Since I don't quite know which ones are banned, and I'm seriously wondering which ones are, I thought I'd ask. I know that piledrivers are banned, but what else and why?
Tawren Posted April 26, 2004 Report Posted April 26, 2004 Most overhead suplexes. Most head drops, actually.
Guest reshad974 Posted April 26, 2004 Report Posted April 26, 2004 any move that will overshadow TripleH........
Guest Lemmycake Posted April 26, 2004 Report Posted April 26, 2004 The low blow should be banned! Poor fellows!
Masked Man of Mystery Posted April 26, 2004 Report Posted April 26, 2004 The Vertebreaker, anyone doing a choke slam other than Taker, Kane, and Big Show, most forms of good wrestling sequences that involve acrobatics, and the bookers putting the ink to the paper that would give any cruiser not named Guerrero or Mysterio a push ; )
LaParkaYourCar Posted April 26, 2004 Report Posted April 26, 2004 Any sort of head drop is banned except for special circumstances (i.e. whenever Taker pulls enough strings to use the Tombstone) Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD.
Guest sanyo Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. You mean DDT right?
LaParkaYourCar Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. You mean DDT right? No I mean DVD...as in Death Valley Driver.
Guest Corino 1000 Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. You mean DDT right? Smell the stupidity......
TheBigSwigg Posted April 27, 2004 Author Report Posted April 27, 2004 Is the DDT banned? I've heard several people say so, but I'm never sure as some people use it as finishers. I've heard Jake Roberts say that anyone who does it right will hurt someone, but can you really believe him?
LaParkaYourCar Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Is the DDT banned? I've heard several people say so, but I'm never sure as some people use it as finishers. I've heard Jake Roberts say that anyone who does it right will hurt someone, but can you really believe him? I don't think the DDT is banned because it can be done with relative safety.
Just call me Dan Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Christ did I just warp to the idiot board? Of course if you do a DDT correctly (driving someone's head into an ungiving surface) it will hurt someone. The WWE doesn't advocate the habitual use of any piledrivers and or moves involving much timed acrobatics (Overhead belly to belly). they will be used to some extent if necessary. Please close this jibberish.
TheBigSwigg Posted April 27, 2004 Author Report Posted April 27, 2004 Christ did I just warp to the idiot board? Of course if you do a DDT correctly (driving someone's head into an ungiving surface) it will hurt someone. The DDT's they do now aren't always done the way Jake did them originally. I think I read in a shoot interview review that Jake accidentally came up with the move by slipping while he had someone in a front face lock. That's what I mean. i'm not talking about "literally" doing a DDT, I'm talking about how it was originally done. In that interview Jake said that no one now, not even Raven, does the DDT correctly EDIT: Jake the Snake Shoot
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Any sort of head drop is banned except for special circumstances (i.e. whenever Taker pulls enough strings to use the Tombstone) Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. I doubt Taker has to actually pull strings to use the Tombstone. I think it's just understood that it's for big matches.
LaParkaYourCar Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Any sort of head drop is banned except for special circumstances (i.e. whenever Taker pulls enough strings to use the Tombstone) Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. I doubt Taker has to actually pull strings to use the Tombstone. I think it's just understood that it's for big matches. Yeah. Either way it's just an occasional move is what I was trying to say.
Anakin Flair Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Isn't Taker using the Tombstone again now that he's in the Deadman gimick? (Not that I have seen him, since he's never ON TV)
Placebo Effect Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Well, the women just answered the DDT question.
Guest Anglesault Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Any sort of head drop is banned except for special circumstances (i.e. whenever Taker pulls enough strings to use the Tombstone) Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. I doubt Taker has to actually pull strings to use the Tombstone. I think it's just understood that it's for big matches. He used against Test....
Guest Your Olympic Hero Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. And Chavo doesn't do a real brainbuster. It makes their moves look dumb and painless. Michael Cole even called Chavo's brainbuster a "suplex" on Smackdown before Tazz corrected him. Idiot.
Cran Da Maniac Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Also, anybody other then HBK using a Superkick is banned.
tekcop Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Also, anybody other then HBK using a Superkick is banned. Smackdown guys seem to be able to use them. Rikishi, Shelton, & Palumbo all used them.
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Christ did I just warp to the idiot board? Of course if you do a DDT correctly (driving someone's head into an ungiving surface) it will hurt someone. The DDT's they do now aren't always done the way Jake did them originally. I think I read in a shoot interview review that Jake accidentally came up with the move by slipping while he had someone in a front face lock. That's what I mean. i'm not talking about "literally" doing a DDT, I'm talking about how it was originally done. In that interview Jake said that no one now, not even Raven, does the DDT correctly EDIT: Jake the Snake Shoot Jake's a selfimportant coke addict. Believe nothing he said.
Guest Quik Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Anything that looks moderately effective as a finisher other than the superkick is banned.
Guest Trivia247 Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Any sort of head drop is banned except for special circumstances (i.e. whenever Taker pulls enough strings to use the Tombstone) Mostly it's real versions of moves that are banned like: the DVD and Brainbuster. That's why Cena doesn't do a real DVD. which is strange because a Actual DVD finisher with the opponent Held Snugly against the Attacker's shoulders Looks more Safe than Cena's version of just dropping him on the side.
Nevermortal Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 I'm not a fan of the banning of moves, but I do like the fact that when they do use them every once in a blue moon, it really means something.
Dace59 Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 Just because a move is hardly used, doesn't mean it always been something. It still has to be built to mean something, or put over that it does. You could bring up the whole look over condition that lead to more injuries, but eh, if the WWE wants to tone down some moves fine, but wrestlers really need to expand the lower end moves for that to work. If the WWE move culter moved away from a hand full of sig moves, to everyone have a very board range of low and mid level moves along with their signutre moves, any of the higher end moves would look deadly. But that's not the way it works.
WhenDanSaysJump Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 All non-sitout powerbombs also seem to be banned. What I found interesting was that the incidences of neck injuries seemed to increase AFTER the piledriver ban (post JD 2000 when Taker gave HHH a stinger during his run-in)
Dace59 Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 That was from the Pedigree on the table that didn't break wasn't it, rather than the Tombstone.
Guest Trivia247 Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 All non-sitout powerbombs also seem to be banned. What I found interesting was that the incidences of neck injuries seemed to increase AFTER the piledriver ban (post JD 2000 when Taker gave HHH a stinger during his run-in) that was into JBL laid out a Mexican looking Paul London in a subpar Agulia Mask with a Standing Jackknife like Powerbomb
LaParkaYourCar Posted April 27, 2004 Report Posted April 27, 2004 That was from the Pedigree on the table that didn't break wasn't it, rather than the Tombstone. Don't remember that happening. Every report I've heard was that when Taker returned at Judgment Day 2000 he gave HHH a Tombstone that impacted his head too hard and gave him a stinger.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now