Guest marianne Report post Posted July 1, 2004 What are your thoughts on the Great American Bash? Jim Ross: I thought it was a very challenging show. The first thing he looks at is what kind of effort did we have and what kind of production values did we have? The effort from the talent was outstanding and the production quality of the show was tremendous. If I had to grade the show on a 1-10 scale, I would probably give it a five or a little bit less. It just didn't deliver for me from start to finish like he thought it would. Rey Mysterio delivered in his match but the Bull Rope Match was challenging. Not everybody can do a bull rope match or a leather strap match or a Russian chain match because they are very challenging. I thought Eddie Guerrero and JBL had a very solid outing and I liked the start of the show with the sudden elimination four way. That worked out pretty well, but we had some matches on there where some talents just aren't established yet. Mordecai, Suzuki and Luther Reigns aren't established yet and people don't know what to expect from them. I don't know what the concept is with the Undertaker and the Dudleys. As the show went off the air, I got it better but I really didn't know what to anticipate in that match. Overall, the show was probably a 4 or a 5 on a 10 scale. Caller: What did you think about Jeff Hardy joining TNA? Jim Ross: I was surprised to see Jeff wrestle for TNA, pleasantly surprised. He's pleased he's active and he'll be a welcome addition to TNA. As for where he goes long term, Jim has a lot of strong feelings towards Jeff. He is a good kid, very talented and maybe some day the WWE can do business with him again. The door is open but it is just a matter of Jeff taking the right journey. Jim wishes Jeff nothing but the best and he wishes the TNA guys nothing but the best because they are not the enemy by any means. More power to Jeff Hardy for working for TNA. * from this weeks byte this show... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 1, 2004 When did Jim become the New Rock with the 3rd person speak? and you know GAB sucks when Jim Hoss says it sucked. I miss the old weekly JR Report. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2004 JR's diplomatic way of saying things sucked is hilarious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2004 I don't know what the concept is with the Undertaker and the Dudleys. As the show went off the air, I got it better but I really didn't know what to anticipate in that match. What is JR's job behind the scene's these days? Isn't he still part of talent relations in some ways? He should have an idea of what matches the guys are doing. Also, when it was reported Vince wasn't at the PPV it was said JR helped out with commentry. Good thing he's feeding Tazz and Cole their lines when he doesn't even understand the match himself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Use Your Illusion 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2004 Challenging - JR for 'horseshit' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Use Your Illusion 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2004 Yikes, that marianne individual lasted long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheBigSwigg 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2004 Yikes, that marianne individual lasted long. It was Glenn. Again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Fook Report post Posted July 2, 2004 That guy just can't take a hint. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vanhalen 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2004 You just gotta love these diplomatic interludes from Ross, challenging indeed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dazed Report post Posted July 2, 2004 JR's diplomatic way of saying things sucked is hilarious. I don't think he even tried this time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iggymcfly 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2004 I kinda felt like translating, so here goes. I thought it was a very challenging show. The first thing he looks at is what kind of effort did we have and what kind of production values did we have? The effort from the talent was outstanding and the production quality of the show was tremendous. Given the card, it would have been almost impossible to put on a good show here, but at least they tried. If I had to grade the show on a 1-10 scale, I would probably give it a five or a little bit less. It just didn't deliver for me from start to finish like he thought it would. Rey Mysterio delivered in his match but the Bull Rope Match was challenging. I couldn't even justify calling this show average. It was actually worse than I thought it would be. The cruiserweight match was probably the only good one on the whole card. Not everybody can do a bull rope match or a leather strap match or a Russian chain match because they are very challenging. I thought Eddie Guerrero and JBL had a very solid outing and I liked the start of the show with the sudden elimination four way. JBL and Eddie can't really do a bullrope match. Of course, the show was so bad that they still were probably tied for second best match of the night with the four way. That worked out pretty well, but we had some matches on there where some talents just aren't established yet. Mordecai, Suzuki and Luther Reigns aren't established yet and people don't know what to expect from them. There's no way in hell that Mordecai, Suzuki, or Luther Reigns belong a PPV. People just don't want to see them. I don't know what the concept is with the Undertaker and the Dudleys. As the show went off the air, I got it better but I really didn't know what to anticipate in that match. I don't know what they were thinking with the main event match. As the show went off the air, I liked that it was over, but the actual match was really stupid. Overall, the show was probably a 4 or a 5 on a 10 scale. Overall, the show was probably a 4 or 5 on a 10 scale where a 10 means the best PPV of the year, and a 5 means "Hey, at least nobody died this time." Since Paul Bearer's death will be very short-lived, I can almost give this show a 5, but I should probably give it a 4 just to be safe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest combat_rock Report post Posted July 2, 2004 Now that was funny. At least someone in an official position of power in the WWE admitted (however weakly) that they had a horrible show with horrible build up. I'll take these small victories, considering that this is the company that once made Gorrilla Monsoon say, with a straight face, that "No Holds Barred" was recieving Oscar attention. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dynamite Kido Report post Posted July 2, 2004 some talents just aren't established yet. Mordecai, Suzuki and Luther Reigns aren't established yet and people don't know what to expect from them. So yet they are shoved on PPV with no proper build to ANY of their matches...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BHK 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2004 Now that was funny. At least someone in an official position of power in the WWE admitted (however weakly) that they had a horrible show with horrible build up. I'll take these small victories, considering that this is the company that once made Gorrilla Monsoon say, with a straight face, that "No Holds Barred" was recieving Oscar attention. the first step to fixing a problem is admitting there is one....? Hopefully, anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detox 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2004 i saw the tape of the ppv last night i didnt even pay for it but i want my money and my 3 hours back Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted July 2, 2004 Would it kill you to use some kind of sentence structure? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
notJames 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2004 Don't blame him... he's in detox. Jim Ross is the last person I want to evaluate anything, much less the company's PPVs. All he's doing is dragging his credibility further down the pike. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2004 I don't know what the concept is with the Undertaker and the Dudleys. Replace the word "concept" with "fuck" or "hell" and J.R. hit the nail right on the head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Captain Jack Sparrow Report post Posted July 5, 2004 so far, G.A.B. was the worse PPV this year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites