Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 You're not using logic. How would it help the Kerry campaign to leak a comment like that, which furthers the link--percieved or real--to Berger?
Jobber of the Week Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 Man, if Rice did this, she'd be lynched by now. -=Mike ..."It doesn't matter. It happened MONTHS ago." "Well, so did Abu Gharib" "But..." It would make sense. She's a member of the current administration and everyone knows who she is by now.
Vyce Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 But here we have one of the previous administration's boys literally stuffing paper into his fucking undies to make sure no one else sees it. Yeah, because you're not exaggerating there at all. You're right - instead of undies, substitute "socks." I missed it by a couple feet. The illegal activity, of course, remains the same. But let's continue to ignore THAT little fact.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 He didn't put them in his socks, either.
NoCalMike Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 He didn't put them in his socks, either. Indeed, well at least it has yet to be proven. The "socks & underwear" thing was started as fuel on the fire by some columnist, and then every right winder started to just repeat it to try and add to the effect of the story.......
Dr. Tom Posted July 23, 2004 Report Posted July 23, 2004 Who cares where he put them? He could've put them up his ass for all it matters. "OMG HE NEVER PUT THEM IN HIS SAWKS~!!!11!!!1!!" He still stole classified documents. Quit trying to defend the theft of sensitive material by disputing where the guy put the things he made off with.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted July 23, 2004 Report Posted July 23, 2004 I'm not disputing that he broke the law. I'm debating the extreme rhetoric being used in this topic for the sake of crucifying the guy. The Bush Administration's Justice Department is probably not even going to charge this guy. I have a feeling we don't know all the facts.
Spicy McHaggis Posted July 26, 2004 Report Posted July 26, 2004 I'm not disputing that he broke the law. I'm debating the extreme rhetoric being used in this topic for the sake of crucifying the guy. The Bush Administration's Justice Department is probably not even going to charge this guy. I have a feeling we don't know all the facts. Why do you preface every national department with "Bush Administration"? Even if it's a president you don't like, it's still the United States Department of Justice... at least it is if you believe in the system.
NoCalMike Posted July 26, 2004 Report Posted July 26, 2004 I'm not disputing that he broke the law. I'm debating the extreme rhetoric being used in this topic for the sake of crucifying the guy. The Bush Administration's Justice Department is probably not even going to charge this guy. I have a feeling we don't know all the facts. Basically what Tyler said. Look if there is reason to believe suspicious acts happened, charge the man and give him his day in court. If he is guilty, throw the book at him. However, don't just start making things up to sensationalize the story for the purpose of effect.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now