BX 0 Report post Posted August 16, 2004 Kerry's grown on me... there are still some obvious things that annoy the hell out of me about him, but I realized that I liked him more than before while watching C-Span a week before the convention. He was at this kind of front porch, small town tour... and he had people sitting around him in front of someones lawn I think... and he just answered all of their questions, and he actually showed a side that I had no seen of him before. It's like he was acting as himself, instead of the stiff, boring Senator that I've seen for the past year. Not only that, but you could tell he had a firm grasp on the issues, and went into major detail answering each persons questions... I forgot what that looked like after nearly 4 years of Bush. I've tried to watch Dubyah objectively, but I'm sorry... when he is asked questions by either reporters or voters, it never looks as if he really knows what he's talking about. He always give a point A to point B explanation on everything... the cliff notes version that is dumbed down beyond explanation. "I cut taxes because by cutting taxes... more money... goes into your pocket... next question" Yes because we all know that obectivity was Big'Obectivity'Jig's middle name Sorry Jig don't get upset, I'll go back to my corner................ ::stares blankly at GreatOnes "retort" for a few moments, before pausing to comprehend the complete absurdity of it:: God DAMN, you're a retard GreatOne. No two ways about it man, you're a total retard, a meth freak at the very least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted August 17, 2004 You're the one staring blankly and I'M the retard, you got it. I made another friend here I see................... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted August 17, 2004 When you're retarded, everyone is your friend. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted August 17, 2004 When you're retarded, everyone is your friend. Speaking from experience are we? As Mike would say, I don't wanna hear about your personal problems. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EricMM 0 Report post Posted August 17, 2004 Oh Jesus GreatOne don't start quoting Mike, you're already enough alike. I gotta tell you, quoting him isn't making you look good. But most of what you say doesn't either, so I mean you're no worse off. Hey, BTW, Kerry is a flip-flopper. Kerry is a politician. But he's so much better than Bush, it's scary they're in the same presidential race. I dunno, maybe they should have differnet catagories, like in wrestling or boxing. Kerry can go in the flip-flopper class, and Bush can go into the sellout-your-environment-and-peace class. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted August 17, 2004 GreatOne don't start quoting Mike, you're already enough alike. Fine would it have made you feel better if I'd merely said 'As stated elsewhere'? But he's so much better than Bush Gee you'd think in the last six months since it became clear he was going to be 'The One' somebody'd have come up with a reason WHY he is. sellout-your-environment-and-peace 1)You're breathing aren't you? 2)So I guess the perpetrators of 911 were merely 'peaceful activists', you got it........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted August 17, 2004 There should be a Godwin's Law for invoking 9/11 in a smear while discussing foreign policy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted August 17, 2004 Oh Jesus GreatOne don't start quoting Mike, you're already enough alike. Hey, why not start a conspiracy theory about us being the same poster? I gotta tell you, quoting him isn't making you look good. But most of what you say doesn't either, so I mean you're no worse off. Says the kid whose next relevant point will be his first. But he's so much better than Bush, it's scary they're in the same presidential race. So, you spit or swallow? I mean, you're blowing him pretty hard here --- I suppose we're all a little curious. I dunno, maybe they should have differnet catagories, like in wrestling or boxing. Kerry can go in the flip-flopper class, and Bush can go into the sellout-your-environment-and-peace class. Oooh, LAME BURN! LAME BURN! LAME BURN! -=Mike ...Seriously, that was weak --- even by your admittedly sad standards... EDIT: There should be a Godwin's Law for invoking 9/11 in a smear while discussing foreign policy. It's probably right after "Don't accuse a sitting President of sending kids off to get killed for the sake of his unnamed cronies" in that book o' laws. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted August 17, 2004 It's probably right after "Don't accuse a sitting President of sending kids off to get killed for the sake of his unnamed cronies" in that book o' laws. What's the difference if the President is in office or not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted August 17, 2004 It's probably right after "Don't accuse a sitting President of sending kids off to get killed for the sake of his unnamed cronies" in that book o' laws. What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Lord knows some people re-bury FDR for it. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Justice 0 Report post Posted August 17, 2004 When you're retarded, everyone is your friend. You should have just called him "Brick". That would have been the funnier joke. Come on, BX. I expect better flame-baits and insults from you. You are the Liberal Evil Clown around here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest syncer55 Report post Posted August 20, 2004 Kerry is a good candidate, but he doen's have the steam that Bush has. It looks like another 4 years of war with Bush. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hogan Made Wrestling 0 Report post Posted August 20, 2004 The thing that worries me with Kerry is that even if he does get elected, just what sort of mandate is he going to have? Whether he himself believes he is running "against Bush' or "for himself" doesn't matter because everyone in the media, and hence the general public, think it's the former. Unless the Dems take the Senate as well as the White House, Kerry could end up being a real lame duck president, even moreso than pre-9/11 Bush was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted August 20, 2004 One of them should sponsor 'free ice cream sandwich day" who doesn't like an ice cream sandwich. That could unite the country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted August 20, 2004 What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Why? It hurts his feelings? He's supposed to be a public servant in a free country. If they're being disserviced, it's considered an unwritten duty to speak about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted August 20, 2004 What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Why? It hurts his feelings? He's supposed to be a public servant in a free country. If they're being disserviced, it's considered an unwritten duty to speak about it. Apparently, "speaking about disservice" and "demonizing the President" are one in the same. You know, when you make ridiculous claims, nobody listens. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted August 20, 2004 What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Why? It hurts his feelings? He's supposed to be a public servant in a free country. If they're being disserviced, it's considered an unwritten duty to speak about it. Apparently, "speaking about disservice" and "demonizing the President" are one in the same. You know, when you make ridiculous claims, nobody listens. -=Mike lol you're one to talk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted August 20, 2004 What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Why? It hurts his feelings? He's supposed to be a public servant in a free country. If they're being disserviced, it's considered an unwritten duty to speak about it. Apparently, "speaking about disservice" and "demonizing the President" are one in the same. You know, when you make ridiculous claims, nobody listens. -=Mike lol you're one to talk Pot. Kettle. Black. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted August 20, 2004 What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Why? It hurts his feelings? He's supposed to be a public servant in a free country. If they're being disserviced, it's considered an unwritten duty to speak about it. Apparently, "speaking about disservice" and "demonizing the President" are one in the same. You know, when you make ridiculous claims, nobody listens. -=Mike lol you're one to talk Pot. Kettle. Black. -=Mike So are you admitting that you make ridiculous statements that no one really listens to? If so, it's a step in the right direction Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted August 20, 2004 What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Why? It hurts his feelings? He's supposed to be a public servant in a free country. If they're being disserviced, it's considered an unwritten duty to speak about it. Apparently, "speaking about disservice" and "demonizing the President" are one in the same. You know, when you make ridiculous claims, nobody listens. -=Mike lol you're one to talk Pot. Kettle. Black. -=Mike So are you admitting that you make ridiculous statements that no one really listens to? If so, it's a step in the right direction I also actually have the ability to produce intelligent posts --- which puts me far ahead of your contributions to date. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted August 20, 2004 What's the difference if the President is in office or not? It's wrong then. Why? It hurts his feelings? He's supposed to be a public servant in a free country. If they're being disserviced, it's considered an unwritten duty to speak about it. Apparently, "speaking about disservice" and "demonizing the President" are one in the same. You know, when you make ridiculous claims, nobody listens. -=Mike lol you're one to talk Pot. Kettle. Black. -=Mike So are you admitting that you make ridiculous statements that no one really listens to? If so, it's a step in the right direction I also actually have the ability to produce intelligent posts --- which puts me far ahead of your contributions to date. -=Mike says MikeSC: Master of Melodrama - aka: Captain Context I think there is more than enough evidence here, that you are nothing but a belligerent fool who will argue even after being proven wrong, often arguing yourself into a corner, or in circles which is rather funny to watch. You're also no stranger to hypocrisy... blasting those that buy into Michael Moore's bullshit, while you obviously have no problems listening to the morons of the right, Limbaugh and Hannity... And I would be lying if I said I DIDNT laugh out loud when I read that you are actually reading that book written about Kerry's Vietnam service... just a few months after you called the books of Al Franken and Molly Ivins propoganda and mindless drivel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tom 0 Report post Posted August 20, 2004 Will you people STOP QUOTING THE ENTIRE GODDAMN THREAD IN YOUR REPLIES? Jesus Christ on a fucking pogo stick, we can follow the bloody conversation without having to scroll two pages down to read a three-line reply. For fuck's sake. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted August 20, 2004 Says MikeSC: Master of Melodrama - aka: Captain Context I think there is more than enough evidence here, that you are nothing but a belligerent fool who will argue even after being proven wrong, often arguing yourself into a corner, or in circles which is rather funny to watch. You're also no stranger to hypocrisy... blasting those that buy into Michael Moore's bullshit, while you obviously have no problems listening to the morons of the right, Limbaugh and Hannity... And I would be lying if I said I DIDNT laugh out loud when I read that you are actually reading that book written about Kerry's Vietnam service... just a few months after you called the books of Al Franken and Molly Ivins propoganda and mindless drivel Didn't refer to Molly Ivins book as anything. And I read Al Franken's book before I made my opinion. I suppose you read this book before you trashed it, right? Right? -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted August 20, 2004 Says MikeSC: Master of Melodrama - aka: Captain Context I think there is more than enough evidence here, that you are nothing but a belligerent fool who will argue even after being proven wrong, often arguing yourself into a corner, or in circles which is rather funny to watch. You're also no stranger to hypocrisy... blasting those that buy into Michael Moore's bullshit, while you obviously have no problems listening to the morons of the right, Limbaugh and Hannity... And I would be lying if I said I DIDNT laugh out loud when I read that you are actually reading that book written about Kerry's Vietnam service... just a few months after you called the books of Al Franken and Molly Ivins propoganda and mindless drivel Didn't refer to Molly Ivins book as anything. And I read Al Franken's book before I made my opinion. I suppose you read this book before you trashed it, right? Right? -=Mike Hmmm I think I remember using the same argument when I asked you if you had read Bush's Brain - a book you trashed when you obviously had no clue about itanyway since you passed it off as a book that just insulted Bush's intelligence, when in reality it was about Karl Roves influence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted August 20, 2004 Says MikeSC: Master of Melodrama - aka: Captain Context I think there is more than enough evidence here, that you are nothing but a belligerent fool who will argue even after being proven wrong, often arguing yourself into a corner, or in circles which is rather funny to watch. You're also no stranger to hypocrisy... blasting those that buy into Michael Moore's bullshit, while you obviously have no problems listening to the morons of the right, Limbaugh and Hannity... And I would be lying if I said I DIDNT laugh out loud when I read that you are actually reading that book written about Kerry's Vietnam service... just a few months after you called the books of Al Franken and Molly Ivins propoganda and mindless drivel Didn't refer to Molly Ivins book as anything. And I read Al Franken's book before I made my opinion. I suppose you read this book before you trashed it, right? Right? -=Mike Hmmm I think I remember using the same argument when I asked you if you had read Bush's Brain - a book you trashed when you obviously had no clue about itanyway since you passed it off as a book that just insulted Bush's intelligence, when in reality it was about Karl Roves influence. I didn't say anything about the book. The theory behind it is borderline idiotic, but I have no desire to read it. I didn't comment on the book itself. Karl Rove is a bogeyman to the left. If somebody told you that he introduced crack to the inner city, you'd believe it. And, gee, where would I get the idea that some on the left have gone over the edge? -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
