Guest Cerebus Report post Posted October 3, 2004 Or so Drudge says. I don't think Kerry had anything of the sort but who knows? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted October 3, 2004 Fuck dude, now GreatOne and Mike are never going to stop yaking about this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted October 3, 2004 Kerry had a neuron gun which made the President incoherant. And he wore lifts in his shoes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 3, 2004 I noticed him fishing for something before the debate anyway. I EXPECT Dems to cheat, as a general rule. This is nothing shocking. Hell, when Bush wins by 5 points, I expect the Dems to file suits in court regardless. However, it does explain Kerry's performance nicely. Too bad his cheat sheet didn't include actually useful information or moderately effective policies. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Cerebus Report post Posted October 3, 2004 Fuck dude, now GreatOne and Mike are never going to stop yaking about this. I know, but I couldn't resist an excuse to use l33t sp34k for a title for a thread in CE and it make sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snuffbox 0 Report post Posted October 3, 2004 I think I may have seen a tranquilizer dart in the left side of Bush's neck as well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prophet of Mike Zagurski 0 Report post Posted October 3, 2004 You never know if the Heinz's company has a time machine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 3, 2004 I think I may have seen a tranquilizer dart in the left side of Bush's neck as well... Damn that Kurt Angle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Edwin MacPhisto 0 Report post Posted October 3, 2004 Kerry replaced both himself and the president with robots, and made his robot do a better job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted October 3, 2004 John Kerry had a shiny object on his sleeve, which distracted George W. Bush Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 4, 2004 He had to have something to animate his corpse. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobobrazil1984 0 Report post Posted October 4, 2004 seems like a pretty lame excuse. just accept it, regroup, and come out stronger in the next debate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 4, 2004 seems like a pretty lame excuse. just accept it, regroup, and come out stronger in the next debate. Bush, nor the Republicans, have made a stink about this. If that debate was a "win" for Kerry, I'd hate to see a loss. -=Mike ..."Pretty pictures = win" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Even you're saying it was at the least, barely a win. Knowing your partisan and biased nature, that probably means that Kerry did win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 4, 2004 What Kerry reached for... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Uh, yeah. Keep believing that.......................... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Kerry replaced both himself and the president with robots, and made his robot do a better job. Why would he need to replace HIMSELF with a robot? Wouldn't it be more like exchanging one for another? I can just hear it now: 'I-WON, I-WON, LET'S-PAR-TEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Uh, yeah. Keep believing that.......................... I will. Along with most of America. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Drudge Drudge Drudge Drudge Just highlighting the important part here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Drudge is as credible as the NYT. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Kerry replaced both himself and the president with robots, and made his robot do a better job. Why would he need to replace HIMSELF with a robot? Wouldn't it be more like exchanging one for another? I can just hear it now: 'I-WON, I-WON, LET'S-PAR-TEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!' Bitter, friend? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Wouldn't I have to have something to be bitter about? The overrating of Kerry's performance is quite amusing in all honesty.................. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snuffbox 0 Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Overrating? A majority of America has agreed that John Kerry won the debate at best, drew the President on his own big issue at worse....this is the decision of the country, just because your guy didn't win doesnt mean that anything was 'overrated'. I dont even see the Bush camp refuting these results too much... But of course, in greatone's esteemed opinion, the same American majority speaking here is probably the same group that got over 9-11 on September 12th Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Wouldn't I have to have something to be bitter about? The overrating of Kerry's performance is quite amusing in all honesty.................. So is your attempt to sell Bush as anything other than the loser of the debate. Bush lost. He got his ass kicked, and now the Gallup polls reflect a shift in public opinion. You were wrong, I was right, thank you, come again. Kerry's performance is not overrated. He defeated Bush utterly. That's what happened and that's what people are saying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 4, 2004 The voices in your head are not, technically, "people". -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Wouldn't I have to have something to be bitter about? The overrating of Kerry's performance is quite amusing in all honesty.................. So is your attempt to sell Bush as anything other than the loser of the debate. Bush lost. He got his ass kicked, and now the Gallup polls reflect a shift in public opinion. You were wrong, I was right, thank you, come again. Kerry's performance is not overrated. He defeated Bush utterly. That's what happened and that's what people are saying. Yes because a point or two constitutes an ass-kicking. Uh huh................... If he had 'defeated Bush utterly', he wouldn't have set himself up for mockery down the road (global test, bilateral talks, Iran nuclear exchange). So, come again................... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Drudge is as credible as the NYT. Don't know about that, but I'll draw a compromise and say LA Times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest SteveyP93 Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Watching Bush "debate" brings me back to junior high and high school. Remember those oral reports? There was always at least one slacker who just copied an encyclopedia entry or a web site onto some note cards and went up there with zero prep. No eye contact, leaning on the podium, stuttering and stammering through the whole thing, clearly no idea what he is reading. I've got a suggestion for "President" Bush: if you're going to answer every question with prepared statements that your flunkies wrote for you, at least make sure that you understand what the hell you are reading. Fucking retard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Ah, a blithering putz thinks Bush is a fucking moron. Delicious is the irony. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 4, 2004 Watching SteveyP93 "debate" brings me back to junior high and high school. Remember those oral reports? There was always at least one slacker who just copied an encyclopedia entry or a web site onto some note cards and went up there with zero prep. No eye contact, leaning on the podium, stuttering and stammering through the whole thing, clearly no idea what he is reading. I've got a suggestion for "SteveyP93: if you're going to answer every question with prepared statements that your flunkies wrote for you, at least make sure that you understand what the hell you are reading. Fucking retard. See I can do that too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
