EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Mine's had some digital static, but no blackout. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smues Report post Posted October 8, 2004 5-1 Boston and they're busting this one open. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 So nice of Anaheim to just completely roll over this series. Christ, at least Oakland puts up a fight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the max 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Bronson is approaching tilde territory. 5-1 going into the bottom of the fifth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 This is really pathetic. I figured the Sox were going to take the series, but the Angels look completely helpless out there. That fifth inning for the Halos was borderline embarrassing. Taking pitches right down the middle and awful-looking swings. Appears that they're not even going to make this one interesting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 I guess the rally monkey decided to take the week off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? A poor man's Don Mattingly, I would assume. Millar has been a great fielder this season. And at 32, Mattingly hit 291/364/445. That's not far from Kevin Millar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the max 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 6-1 as Manny drives in another, Scot Shields is being taken out. bottom fifth... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brett Favre 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? A poor man's Don Mattingly, I would assume. Millar has been a great fielder this season. And at 32, Mattingly hit 291/364/445. That's not far from Kevin Millar. When statistics go wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? A poor man's Don Mattingly, I would assume. Millar has been a great fielder this season. Kevin Millar? Hell, in every game I've seen it's taken all his effort to move in the general direction of the ball. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? A poor man's Don Mattingly, I would assume. Millar has been a great fielder this season. Kevin Millar? Hell, in every game I've seen it's taken all his effort to move in the general direction of the ball. There's alot that goes into fielding, even that you don't see on tv. Perhaps Millar is excellent at setting up before the play. Win Shares rates him as the second best fielding first baseman in the league. And this is a system that rates Tino Martinez and Don Mattingly as "A" fielders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? A poor man's Don Mattingly, I would assume. Millar has been a great fielder this season. And at 32, Mattingly hit 291/364/445. That's not far from Kevin Millar. When statistics go wrong. Its a bit tounge in cheek. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iliketurtles 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Gotta go, but figured I'd stop in quick. This. Is. Awesome. That is all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? A poor man's Don Mattingly, I would assume. Millar has been a great fielder this season. Kevin Millar? Hell, in every game I've seen it's taken all his effort to move in the general direction of the ball. There's alot that goes into fielding, even that you don't see on tv. Perhaps Millar is excellent at setting up before the play. Win Shares rates him as the second best fielding first baseman in the league. . The League has gone to hell. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brett Favre 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Someone just told me that they were comparing Kevin Millar to DON MATTINGLY? A poor man's Don Mattingly, I would assume. Millar has been a great fielder this season. And at 32, Mattingly hit 291/364/445. That's not far from Kevin Millar. When statistics go wrong. Its a bit tounge in cheek. You just don't do that often. It went over my head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 I'm assuming this is just a SoCal thing. LA and Anaheim have been DOA. "Like woah, man, we both got there and stuff. ::inhales::" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the max 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Arroyo K's Vladdy Daddy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Report post Posted October 8, 2004 look, if you have a pulse, you can be an above-average first basemen defensively. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brett Favre 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 So Jason Giambi doesn't have a pulse? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 So Jason Giambi doesn't have a pulse? Have you seen him lately? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brett Favre 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 So Jason Giambi doesn't have a pulse? Have you seen him lately? He does look horrible, but he had no pulse even when he looked good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Do we really need an in-game update for a game that occured two days ago? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Do we really need an in-game update for a game that occured two days ago? We don't need a lot of things that ESPN shows us during games. But that's niether here nor now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 It's not fair to call the Red Sox a Traveling Band of Idiots. They also have their fair share of burnouts and lunatics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tpww7 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 FUCKKKKKKKKKK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Damn. Just damn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted October 8, 2004 VLAD! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big McLargeHuge 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Holy Shit! Holy Shit! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
therealworldschampion 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 WOW Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
