Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
BUTT

The OAO Vice Presidential Debate Thread

Recommended Posts

Blame the economy on 9/11 - damn he' smart.

9-11 did have some negative effect on the economy...but using it as an excuse is not a particularly good idea...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
He simply told you where to go for a lengthy discussion of all of the problems.

 

You know --- that factcheck.org site.

 

If given a question about Halliburton, he'd be able to respond.

      -=Mike

He had 30 seconds to tell me his claims about Halliburton.

 

Instead of using that 30 seconds the best way he could, he chose to harp on the fact that this was a damned Democratic smokescreen - then directed me to go to factcheck.com, which is a false address anyway.

 

Not exactly too strong there.

30 seconds? As he said, it'll take more than 30 seconds to respond to ALL of the baseless charges.

And, heaven forbid he mistakes .com for .org.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone notice Edwards doing the Clinton thumb/hand gesture?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
No jobs created? Wah?

Edwards has few problems COMPLETELY distorting the facts.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The large amount of Americans harmed by Bush's policies will disagree with Cheney's inflated job/education claims...

 

But his explanations remain eloquently stated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
Don't go into medical costs, Edwards... That's a subject you're VERY vulnerable on.

"We'll do what they have not done".

 

Wow, that is some specific plan there.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Edwards is copying Kerry's bitchiness.

Let's not make a mistake here.

 

When Cheney's question is about talking about the Israeli conflict - and he then decides to tackle the Halliburton claims instead - and then lodges into a personal attack on Edwards' record without any coaxing whatsoever - it looks to me that Cheney was much more harsh on the bitchiness than Edwards was.

 

Edwards is only returning the favor in order to survive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have liked to see Edwards give a vivid explanation of the difference between factory/manufacturing jobs(those lost en masse overseas) vs. dept store/wal mart jobs (those that have been largely created).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC

Man, it's a real shame that the numbers don't come even close to adding up.

 

Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well.

 

This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping.

-=Mike

...And Edwards will not be able to back up the 600 tax cuts for Kerry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Edwards is copying Kerry's bitchiness.

Let's not make a mistake here.

 

When Cheney's question is about talking about the Israeli conflict - and he then decides to tackle the Halliburton claims instead - and then lodges into a personal attack on Edwards' record without any coaxing whatsoever - it looks to me that Cheney was much more harsh on the bitchiness than Edwards was.

 

Edwards is only returning the favor in order to survive.

Interesting how we find ourselves on opposite sides this time. But no hard feelings at all from me at least

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
I like what Edwards said there about the tax cuts. +3

Despite the, well, total lack of facts, eh?

 

Yup, sounds 'bout right.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well.

 

This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping.

-=Mike

Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching?

 

Seriously now.

 

What in the hell are you watching?

 

Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Edwards is copying Kerry's bitchiness.

Let's not make a mistake here.

 

When Cheney's question is about talking about the Israeli conflict - and he then decides to tackle the Halliburton claims instead - and then lodges into a personal attack on Edwards' record without any coaxing whatsoever - it looks to me that Cheney was much more harsh on the bitchiness than Edwards was.

 

Edwards is only returning the favor in order to survive.

Interesting how we find ourselves on opposite sides this time. But no hard feelings at all from me at least

THE MEGA-POWERS EXPLODE!!

 

It was bound to happen sooner or later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne
Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well.

 

This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping.

                    -=Mike

Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching?

 

Seriously now.

 

What in the hell are you watching?

 

Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well.

Whether Cheney's being Edwards' real daddy or not, it's merely the other side playing ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×