Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
BUTT

The OAO Vice Presidential Debate Thread

Recommended Posts

Guest MikeSC
Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well.

 

This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping.

                    -=Mike

Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching?

 

Seriously now.

 

What in the hell are you watching?

 

Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well.

You are completely blind to reality.

 

Edwards is simply the guy who can't go BEYOND talking points and is petrified to do so.

 

And if he REALLY wants to attack capital gains tax cuts, he'll only be attacking, you know, EVERYBODY WITH A RETIREMENT PLAN.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well.

 

This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping.

                    -=Mike

Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching?

 

Seriously now.

 

What in the hell are you watching?

 

Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well.

Dont take Mikes opinion too seriously...hes only going to see a total Republican victory. Hes not the one to ask for objectivity...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne

OK how many times is Edwards gonna do the 'fundamental difference between them and us' thing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well.

 

This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping.

                    -=Mike

Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching?

 

Seriously now.

 

What in the hell are you watching?

 

Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well.

Dont take Mikes opinion too seriously...hes only going to see a total Republican victory. Hes not the one to ask for objectivity...

I had no problem saying Bush looked bad on Thursday.

 

Today, this is a royal ass-kicking.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne
Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well.

 

This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping.

                    -=Mike

Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching?

 

Seriously now.

 

What in the hell are you watching?

 

Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well.

Dont take Mikes opinion too seriously...hes only going to see a total Republican victory. Hes not the one to ask for objectivity...

Or you..............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK how many times is Edwards gonna do the 'fundamental difference between them and us' thing?

Showing that difference is the inherant idea behind the concept of debate...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edwards just screwed up... IIRC, in the 1960s the Supreme Court DID rule that states have to accept interracial marriages from another state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne
OK how many times is Edwards gonna do the 'fundamental difference between them and us' thing?

Showing that difference is the inherant idea behind the concept of debate...

Yet Bush repeating points ad nauseum is OMGDUMBFUCK2004!~....................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC

Wow, Edwards completely inventing the "difficulties" in doing such things as getting their "equal rights".

 

He's a lawyer --- he should know better.

 

Unless he's a shitty lawyer.

-=Mike

...And he's 100% incorrect once again --- he, apparently, missed the whole "Full Faith and Credit Clause"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Edwards just screwed up... IIRC, in the 1960s the Supreme Court DID rule that states have to accept interracial marriages from another state.

...and he keeps hammering it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cerebus

According to Edwards, if I move to Virginia or Maryland (or, hopefully, to Hawaii) I'll have to get married again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
Edwards just screwed up...  IIRC, in the 1960s the Supreme Court DID rule that states have to accept interracial marriages from another state.

...and he keeps hammering it.

That only makes it worse.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good point regarding state's not being required to recognize/not recognize a marriage (straight or gay)

 

Good showing of thanks by Cheney there

 

Now we're getting to the malpractice issue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
According to Edwards, if I move to Virginia or Maryland (or, hopefully, to Hawaii) I'll have to get married again?

Yes. And you'll LIKE it!

Oh!

 

Cheney got owned on that topic.

Provided you ignore that Edwards couldn't have been more incorrect on it than he was.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×