Art Sandusky Posted April 18, 2005 Report Posted April 18, 2005 April 19th, tomorrow, is the 10th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing and the 11th anniversary of the fiery demise of David Koresh and the Branch Davidians. So enjoy this conspiracy site! (I actually find a lot of the stuff here to be compelling, though I accept the McVeigh/Nichols argument, kinda like how I am with Oswald shooting Kennedy)
2GOLD Posted April 18, 2005 Report Posted April 18, 2005 It's been ten years? Damn, it seems like so much longer after 9/11 for some reason.
Jobber of the Week Posted April 18, 2005 Report Posted April 18, 2005 I think OKC really has one moment of harsh relevance for today's society, which is a reminder that the next terrorist making the headline news might not be able to be stopped by immigration controls or racial stereotyping.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I was home because that day featured afternoon college classes. I remember watching it unfold live on TV. Very disturbing...
Highland Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 (edited) I think OKC really has one moment of harsh relevance for today's society, which is a reminder that the next terrorist making the headline news might not be able to be stopped by immigration controls or racial stereotyping. Because we all know some white guy born in the US would never think about blowing up some building in a state in the middle of the country. Edited April 19, 2005 by Highland
Vyce Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 It was all Clinton's fault. Okay, I don't really believe that, but as per our usual banter in CE I'm trying to turn this into a republican vs democrat issue. ......you know, on second thought, maybe that's not such a good idea, because I can see Mike getting into a three page argument with someone over how it really WAS Clinton's fault.
Slayer Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I think OKC really has one moment of harsh relevance for today's society, which is a reminder that the next terrorist making the headline news might not be able to be stopped by immigration controls or racial stereotyping. Because we all know some white guy born in the US would never think about blowing up some building in a state in the middle of the country. ...I think that was his point
Vern Gagne Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I think OKC really has one moment of harsh relevance for today's society, which is a reminder that the next terrorist making the headline news might not be able to be stopped by immigration controls or racial stereotyping. I believe that Muslem terrorists were directly involved in the bombing. The militias aren't bright enough, to pull something like OKC off...without help.
Highland Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I think OKC really has one moment of harsh relevance for today's society, which is a reminder that the next terrorist making the headline news might not be able to be stopped by immigration controls or racial stereotyping. I believe that Muslem terrorists were directly involved in the bombing. The militias aren't bright enough, to pull something like OKC off...without help. The "connection" between al'Qaeda and the OKC bombers was only discovered after 9/11. That's too convenient.
Vern Gagne Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 How so? If people looked more in detail to the previous attacks, and all other attacks against the US were prepatrated by Islamic Terrorists, it's not suprising that the possibility, of Islamic terrorist played a rule in the largest terrorist attack on US soil, prior to 9-11.
Guest MikeSC Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I'm just stunned that talk radio was responsible for the OKC bombings (according to Clinton) --- but Islam is NOT responsible for 9/11, whatsoever. -=Mike ...Just reminding the kids what "politicizing a tragedy" actually looks like...
Art Sandusky Posted April 19, 2005 Author Report Posted April 19, 2005 Okay guys, like, no. Don't turn this into that. There's a buncha other threads here.
LessonInMachismo Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 There is a book by a guy involved in the investigation which included such facts as: Ten minutes before the explosion, a vehicle with several Middle-Eastern men sped away from the building.
Edwin MacPhisto Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Haha. Sorry, Kotz. Nothing is safe.
Highland Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 There is a book by a guy involved in the investigation which included such facts as: Ten minutes before the explosion, a vehicle with several Middle-Eastern men sped away from the building. Did he also mention they were questioned by the authorities and susequently released?
LessonInMachismo Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 There is a book by a guy involved in the investigation which included such facts as: Ten minutes before the explosion, a vehicle with several Middle-Eastern men sped away from the building. Did he also mention they were questioned by the authorities and susequently released? He may have...I don't know. Did he?
kkktookmybabyaway Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I remember hearing of some Muslim connection, and I think it's quite possible that there could have been one. But so what -- it doesn't make the crime less/more worse...
Guest Agent of Oblivion Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Moving van full of fertilizer bomb is a white hillbilly move.
Rob E Dangerously Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 If there was a legitimate Middle Eastern tie to OKC, wouldn't it have been mentioned by somebody in the Government sometime in the last 3 years? Just saying
kkktookmybabyaway Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I'm not trying to go off on some conspiracy here, but I think it would be possible for these rednecks to have had some connection to a terrorist group. I'm not saying we go out and get Habib or anything, but I wouldn't be shocked if they spoke with some terrorist cell or something. Please tell me I'm not turning into INXS...
Highland Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 If there was a legitimate Middle Eastern tie to OKC, wouldn't it have been mentioned by somebody in the Government sometime in the last 3 years? Just saying Exactly. It wasn't like muslims weren't on the terrorist watch list even back then.
Vern Gagne Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Moving van full of fertilizer bomb is a white hillbilly move. Fertilizer was used in the first WTC bombing in 1993.
Guest SideFXs Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Moving van full of fertilizer bomb is a white hillbilly move. Well, a couple of people beat me in responding, but here goes. (AP) The explosive of choice in several of the most spectacular terrorist bombings around the world — http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/14/...ain611898.shtml Try and think, you Racist Liberal Moron. McVeigh did have sympathies for Islamic Terrorists and said Heissein had a right to protect Iraq with WMD, BUT... The Third man not official reported by the FBI, in the Clinton-Reno cover-up, was middle eastern. His name was Kusseini (spelling?), an Iraqis secret service agent . He later moved to Boston and worked in airline food services and placed the box-cutters on the high-jacked Jets used on 9/11. Al-Quaida was and still is actively recruiting non-Middle Eastern terrorist in the USA. But I am sure you think our boarders should not be patrolled by the White Trash Minute Men to, too. Do you sympathize with the illegal aliens?
Big Ol' Smitty Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Try and think, you Racist Liberal Moron. Subtle.
Guest MikeSC Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I gotta know, Smitty. Does Tom Tomorrow ever actually get funny or witty --- or is he ALWAYS tedious? -=Mike
Rob E Dangerously Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Tom Tomorrow brings enough sarcasm to kill a moose. There's not much middle ground for TMW.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 I used to like Tom, but I haven't seen any of his work lately -- I'm guessing it's more of the same "OMG Bush is HITLER" drivel, but at least his will probably be good for a laugh or two...
Guest MikeSC Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Tom Tomorrow brings enough sarcasm to kill a moose. There's not much middle ground for TMW. Shouldn't sarcasm contain the mildest semblance of humor? Jon Stewart is sarcastic, but he's funny on occasion. Tom Tomorrow is like an illustrated version of Janeane Garofalo. -=Mike
Nighthawk Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Shouldn't sarcasm contain the mildest semblance of humor? Not necessarily. Sarcasm and humor are often used in conjunction, but are not mutually inclusive.
Guest MikeSC Posted April 19, 2005 Report Posted April 19, 2005 Shouldn't sarcasm contain the mildest semblance of humor? Not necessarily. Sarcasm and humor are often used in conjunction, but are not mutually inclusive. Well, then that Tom Tomorrow is one sarcastic, but non-amusing, muthafucka. -=Mike
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now