Weekend Box Office Report

[bob_barron 0]

I'm just happy we're getting a more faithful adaptation.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Its not like the 1971 film was an I, Robot-level adaptation. It got 95% of the book right.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

Uhhh no it didn't, and I already explained the differences between the book and the movie.

[Vyce 0]

Fuck you, bob. The original Wonka movie was goddamn perfect and this piece of shit is going to be a total abortion.

[SuperJerk 0]

Uhhh no it didn't, and I already explained the differences between the book and the movie.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Dude, you named like 3 tiny details that made almost no difference in the actual plot.

 

Compare that to a movie like I, Robot that resembled the book in name only.

 

 

edit: We need a separate thread for this discussion.

Edited July 12, 2005 by Y2Jerk

[Red Baron 0]

The previews of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is allready better than that Hippie Tripe of Willie Wonka.

[SuperJerk 0]

We have a separate thread now.

 

Please discuss Wonka/Charlie there.

 

This thread is for discussing this past week's box office numbers.

[bobobrazil1984 0]

glad to see batman still has legs.

[Crimson Platypus 0]

Uhhh no it didn't, and I already explained the differences between the book and the movie.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Dude, you named like 3 tiny details that made almost no difference in the actual plot.

 

Compare that to a movie like I, Robot that resembled the book in name only.

 

 

edit: We need a separate thread for this discussion.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

This is a really bad comparison as I, Robot was not actually a story itself, rather a collection of short stories with a "tie-in" of a robo-psychologist named Susan Calvin (I think that was the name) being interviewed by a reporter whom I think was writing an article about her life.

 

(as Fluffy mentioned once already)