Big Ol' Smitty 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 Party foul. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't know what kinda parties you're going to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Ol' Smitty 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 Good news for those who don't like torture! The McCain Amendment passed the Senate, despite Bill Frist's best efforts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Justice 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 Well, thank God for that, I guess. I don't understand why one would oppose something as basic as that. *shrugs* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Art Sandusky 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 So nine senators think this stuff's okay. Allrighty then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boon 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 So nine senators think this stuff's okay. Allrighty then. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nine Senators probably don't want to restrict Presidential power in war-time. Not picking sides, just playing a lil' Devil's Advocate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Edwin MacPhisto 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 Update on the CNN story: Earlier, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said President Bush would likely veto the defense spending bill if McCain's language were included, calling the amendment "unnecessary and duplicative." "If it's presented, then there would be a recommendation of a veto, I believe," McClellan said. Whattadouche. You've gone five years without vetoing a single thing and the thing you're going to call foul on is we shouldn't torture people? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boon 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 So nine senators think this stuff's okay. Allrighty then. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nine Senators probably don't want to restrict Presidential power in war-time. Not picking sides, just playing a lil' Devil's Advocate. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Edwin MacPhisto 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 I'm going to take the controversial position that allowing our country to pursue a policy of torture is a vile misuse of the privilege of presidential power, wartime or not. We're not supposed to torture people, guys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Fishyswa Report post Posted October 6, 2005 Yes because it's crucial that our president is built up as some infallible diety, as opposed to a normal human in a position of power able to make mistakes. If he had the power to personally rape any woman in America would the same stance be justifiable? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boon 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 OMG LIBRALZ DONUT SUPPERT OUR TRUPES Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 I'm going to take the controversial position that allowing our country to pursue a policy of torture is a vile misuse of the privilege of presidential power, wartime or not. We're not supposed to torture people, guys. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The REAL torture is when Americans are made to feel guilty for supporting their president, EDWIN!!!!! God, I get less conservative every day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Art Sandusky 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2005 Coulda fooled me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2005 Well I have a ways to go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2005 I'm probably repeating myself, but this really shouldn't be a liberal or conservative issue! When all's said and done, we're such an incredibly rich, powerful and generally MORAL nation, that we should have the ability to comport ourselves with a modicum of decorum. We destroy every army on earth in a ground fight. If we know someone has information about nuclear weapons, fine, torture him. That's one reprehensible act weighed against the lives of millions. Torturing some innocent rube, or even someone who fired an AK-47 at our troops is, IMO, disgusting. For our administration to be hemming and hawing about armed combatants v enemy soldiers is as bad semantically as Clinton's defense of getting blowies from Monica. And I don't think I have to tell you how much worse it is to be niggling about whether we obey the Geneva Convention (something that we all should be able to LIKE) than whether we came in someone's willing cooch or mouth. Yes the beheaders are far worse, you know why? They are fucking EVIL. No one should be comparing themselves to them on moral grounds. If we're comparing ourselves to bloodthirsty executioners, and if Damian doesn't rollerblade, then the terrorists.... have truly won. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2005 if Damian doesn't rollerblade, then the terrorists.... have truly won. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Just try to imagine a guy saying "man...I would love thome puthy!" you can't! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2005 You broke out a David Cross joke. That's brillant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2005 Like I said in Site Feedback, of all places, SUYFB! starts off so good but loses steam about halfway through and just gets awful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2005 Like I said in Site Feedback, of all places, SUYFB! starts off so good but loses steam about halfway through and just gets awful. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It has some moments in the second half but I can't disagree. It goes from masterpiece to just plain blah so damn quickly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 10, 2005 It's the Kansas City/van/hotel/Xanax thing that kills it dead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Report post Posted April 1, 2006 http://www.aztlan.net/iraqi_women_raped.htm Jesus Christ.... I don't know if these are commen knowledge but they shocked the hell out of me this morning: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Failed Bridge 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2006 the one of her face where she's crying as cocks are shoved in her mouth is the one that really makes ya feel bad for her, at least in my case. I think its because the other pictures look as if they could have been taken from any corny porn spoofing the military where-as the one I mentioned just seems more personal...if that makes sense to anybody. I might not be conveying what I mean in the right words. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2006 If this is an April Fools' joke about Abu Ghirab, that's pretty sick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2006 It's pretty sick then. One guy is wearing camo face paint, another guy's uniform doesn't fit and the woman looks more like she has a tan than she's Iraqi. Odds are very high this is actually from a Russian porn film where mock rape is a really big market now, especially evil soldiers. Plus it's hard to believe these are true picture when THIS is at the top of the page: (Please Note: Many of the photographs showing the rape of Iraqi women and the sodomization of Iraqi POW's at the Abu Ghraib prison are now at USA pornographic websites pointing to the possibility of collusion between the depraved US soldiers in the pictures and US based Jewish pornographers. Many of these photographs were also freely disseminated to US occupation forces, perhaps to inflame their nefarious desires and to motivate them to strike out against the Iraqi populace in these perverse ways.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Report post Posted April 21, 2006 Taking a 2nd look.. yeah they do look staged. For God's sake i hope they are staged. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites