LucharesuFan619 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 The entry is up for deletion. The only way to keep it up is for some people to argue that it meets the notability requirements of Wikipedia, which I think it does. hXXp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...eSmartMarks.com Post your vote by writing: '''Keep''' - reasoning Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrRant 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 I voted to delete as it doesn't meet Wiki criteria. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarvinisaLunatic 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 I laughed at the part about the Poker stuff as a reason to keep it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Felonies! Report post Posted June 10, 2006 I'm really gonna make this turd shine! EDIT: how'd I do Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Ol' Smitty 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 Today, the folder comprises a liberal or socialist majority. LOL. Go to hell, Czech. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LucharesuFan619 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 I'm really gonna make this turd shine! EDIT: how'd I do Sorry man, but that's just going to add to the deletion argument, so I deleted it most of it (all it was was a summary of the forums). We really need to get stuff int here that helps argue about its notability. Plus your version just adds to the advertisement argument. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Hotbutter Spoontoaster Report post Posted June 10, 2006 There is also a well known poster, named "LucharesuFan619", who is known for loving a terrible wrestling promotion called "XPW", and also because everybody hates him. Well that's good to know, at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k thx 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 TSM doesn't deserve a wikiedia entry. Who's gonna read it apart from idiots here who want to wallow in their own imprtance. If it was a spoof entry, then maybe. But not a serious one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 Like half the Wikipedia entries have a legitimate raison d'être in the first place... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 I'm really gonna make this turd shine! EDIT: how'd I do Sorry man, but that's just going to add to the deletion argument, so I deleted it most of it (all it was was a summary of the forums). We really need to get stuff int here that helps argue about its notability. Plus your version just adds to the advertisement argument. He can always just put it back in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LucharesuFan619 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 I'm really gonna make this turd shine! EDIT: how'd I do Sorry man, but that's just going to add to the deletion argument, so I deleted it most of it (all it was was a summary of the forums). We really need to get stuff int here that helps argue about its notability. Plus your version just adds to the advertisement argument. He can always just put it back in. Thanks for the tip, Watson. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Felonies! Report post Posted June 10, 2006 Keep It rocks, IIRC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Felonies! Report post Posted June 10, 2006 TSM doesn't deserve a wikiedia entry. Who's gonna read it apart from idiots here who want to wallow in their own imprtance. What do you think this place is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Hot Thumbtack In The Eye 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 Lucharesufan is attempting to aid in sullying my...OUR good names in the pursuit of this relationship with a website and community that is infested with sexual deviants and other low lifes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k thx 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 TSM doesn't deserve a wikiedia entry. Who's gonna read it apart from idiots here who want to wallow in their own imprtance. What do you think this place is? True. But there's plenty of other ways to do it than feeling like they're subverting wikipedia. I deserve a wikipedia entry more than TSM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BUTT 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 Then make one for yourself! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k thx 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 No. You make one for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Niggardly King 0 Report post Posted June 10, 2006 ATTENTION! If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum pointing to this page, please note that this is not a vote. This is a discussion among Wikipedia editors and is aimed at reaching a consensus on whether the article is suitable for this encyclopedia. The outcome of AfD nominations are primarily determined by the quality of arguments for or against deletion; the process is immune to ballot-stuffing or sockpuppetry. You can participate in the discussion and post your opinions here, even if you are new. Deletion is based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so please take a look at them if you have not already. For more information, see Wikipedia deletion policy. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! I helped out! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 Thanks for the tip, Watson. Why did you put hxxp in the url? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 So considering his name dropping lately I guess it is MY fault that since we have a "liberal slant" here now. By as a result it is MY fault TSM doesn't deserve a wikipedia entry? Czech... wow you need to find something better to do with your time. Do us all a favor and go fuck something. Anything. For once. The least you can do is try. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Felonies! Report post Posted June 11, 2006 So considering his name dropping lately I guess it is MY fault that since we have a "liberal slant" here now. By as a result it is MY fault TSM doesn't deserve a wikipedia entry? Good God, chill out. I can't even read what you just said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted June 11, 2006 EDITED Not flaming someone in here, not now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrRant 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 KEEP - IT MAKES ME LAUFF AND THAT CZECH NIGGAH BE COOL BUT HE HATES RAP AND DAT AIN'T COOL BUT HE STILL COOL 71.108.35.14 20:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC) The Black Guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Ol' Smitty 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 TheSmartMarks.com (TSM for short) is a popular piece of crap. Man, somebody's got it out for us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
admin 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 It doesn't make a difference to me, with or without it, we will still have fans. I doubt anyone who is a member here can say I am a TSM member because of Wikipedia. I would prefer it to stay though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k thx 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 Delete JB196 is trying to get the entry for DVDVR deleted because it is a competitor to TheSmarks. If you want to play this game, so will I. TruthCrusader 08:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC) Superb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adam 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 OMG BOARDWARZ~! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Annabelle 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 tsm has fans? come on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 So considering his name dropping lately I guess it is MY fault that since we have a "liberal slant" here now. By as a result it is MY fault TSM doesn't deserve a wikipedia entry? Good God, chill out. I can't even read what you just said. But whatever I said I need to chill out? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k thx 0 Report post Posted June 11, 2006 So considering his name dropping lately I guess it is MY fault that since we have a "liberal slant" here now. By as a result it is MY fault TSM doesn't deserve a wikipedia entry? Good God, chill out. I can't even read what you just said. But whatever I said I need to chill out? What? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
