chirs3 Posted December 24, 2006 Report Posted December 24, 2006 The Triple Threat, CFC, and Main Event are not all noshows - just some extensions and marker troubles. Also, my sincerest apologies about the false-start on the Hardcore Title match - apparently 'Drea couldn't PM it to me, and I posted the winner of the matches I had in my inbox before finding her match posted on the CC board by Tom. I'm marking it now, and the real result will be up shortly.
chirs3 Posted December 24, 2006 Author Report Posted December 24, 2006 Working on the Main Event now, but I've got a 7:00 AM wakeup call tomorrow, so the Triple Threat's gotta wait. CFC finals have extensions as well, so they'll be up tomorrow too.
chirs3 Posted December 24, 2006 Author Report Posted December 24, 2006 Everything's up but the CFC finals now. Hopefully those will be posted by tomorrow afternoon.
The Amazing Rando Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Congratulations to all those victorious. At least it seemed there may only been one or two matches that were uncontested, no-show aside. Funny, considering that French guy had been asking for a match as of a few shows ago. My undefeated Christmas streak extends to 3-0 (03, 04, 06), and here's hoping I can actually make something of my January, which I haven't really done yet.
Mr. S£im Citrus Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Nothing like a guy snapping to put the exclamation point on a match... that was outstanding. EDIT - And I thought I was the only guy here who'd ever jobbed himself in a title match...
Toxxic Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Tom jobbed to you in the inaugural ladder match for the Cruiserweight Title - he just didn't win, so lost via you beating him instead. But then again, you might have known that he was going to do that - do you define 'jobbing' in this case as writing to lose without your opponent knowing you're going to do that? Congrats to everyone who won, but especially to JJ I think. An excellent comeback to his loss to Landon for the World Title earlier this year.
Above Average Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Finally got my part 2 up. Congrats to JJ by the way... that's a nice looking match. And to Mike, who pulled out the victory even in defeat. I'll look at everyone elses matches again later, but for now, good job from everybody involved.
Mr. S£im Citrus Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Tom jobbed to you in the inaugural ladder match for the Cruiserweight Title - he just didn't win, so lost via you beating him instead. But then again, you might have known that he was going to do that - do you define 'jobbing' in this case as writing to lose without your opponent knowing you're going to do that?I beg your pardon? I didn't know that Tom was writing himself to lose until after I saw his losing match. Are you suggesting that I didn't win legit?
The Amazing Rando Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 he said "he just didn't win, so lost via you beating him". So while he did indeed write himself to lose, your actual match beat his match.
Toxxic Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Tom jobbed to you in the inaugural ladder match for the Cruiserweight Title - he just didn't win, so lost via you beating him instead. But then again, you might have known that he was going to do that - do you define 'jobbing' in this case as writing to lose without your opponent knowing you're going to do that?I beg your pardon? I didn't know that Tom was writing himself to lose until after I saw his losing match. Are you suggesting that I didn't win legit? No. I'm saying that, as far as I knew when I typed that sentence, you might have been aware of the fact that Tom was going to write himself to lose. Or, then again, you might not have been aware of this. Your angry reaction implies that no, you were not previously aware of the fact that Tom was intending to write himself to lose. I was just wondering whether you counted Tom as jobbing in a title match there, given that he wrote himself to lose but it wasn't his match that actually won. I'd also suggest that even if you had known he was going to write to lose, you still would have won 'legit'.
JHawk Posted December 27, 2006 Report Posted December 27, 2006 Why are we arguing over a match from several years ago? Obviously WC's match won legit since it was his match, and not Tom's, that everybody can read in the archives.
Mr. S£im Citrus Posted December 27, 2006 Report Posted December 27, 2006 If we were "arguing," it's only because I was being a sensitive twat the other day... Mea culpa.
JJ Johnson Posted December 27, 2006 Report Posted December 27, 2006 Hey, my match sucked, Clark's match was good, Tom's match was very good at cramming a CDM into the space he did, and the main was not Toxxic's best work, but still very good. Comments!
HollywoodSpikeJenkins Posted December 27, 2006 Report Posted December 27, 2006 I plan on posting my "retirement" promos soon.
Mr. S£im Citrus Posted December 28, 2006 Report Posted December 28, 2006 "We all know that a Porsche 9-11 is in one box, but the other three are unknown gifts. While winning the car would be nice, those keys aren't going to be too much help depending on the contents of those other gifts," Mak says. "I heard your talent's in one of them, so we've got that tiny box covered," King says. I don't care who you are, that's funny right there...
Recommended Posts