Edwin MacPhisto Posted April 22, 2008 Report Posted April 22, 2008 Hahahahha... sorry dude. I would have actually picked this earlier but I was trying to get a few ringer type albums down. Same. I never should have betrayed my one truest love.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted April 22, 2008 Report Posted April 22, 2008 ... I like Springsteen better than the Beatles.
Jaxxson Mayhem Posted April 22, 2008 Report Posted April 22, 2008 What's the point of comparing the Beatles to Springsteen? But then you'd say what's the point of comparing anyone? I like both, but I don't know how to measure "Kitty's Back" against "In My Life." But honestly, Cowboy Numbers, that album you picked sucks. I disagree.
Annabelle Posted April 22, 2008 Report Posted April 22, 2008 What's the point of comparing the Beatles to Springsteen? But then you'd say what's the point of comparing anyone? I like both, but I don't know how to measure "Kitty's Back" against "In My Life." But honestly, Cowboy Numbers, that album you picked sucks. it never started out as such, just surprised how many people have selected springsteen albums, let alone bullshit springsteen albums. i guess tsm is all about the heartland.
Annabelle Posted April 22, 2008 Report Posted April 22, 2008 actually nevermind, it is that way. because springsteen isn't that good. and the beatles are pretty much responsible for the formation of pop group based music as we know it.
Jorge Gorgeous Posted April 22, 2008 Report Posted April 22, 2008 Wait... motherfucking Abbey Road hasn't been picked yet? This draft is fucked.
Ravenbomb Posted April 22, 2008 Report Posted April 22, 2008 I always thought they were MUCH better songwriters than they were musicians and usually preferred the covers of their stuff.
Steviekick Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 I always thought they were MUCH better songwriters than they were musicians and usually preferred the covers of their stuff. That's how I feel. I don't have a single Beatles record, but I have a bunch of their songs performed by other artists that get some good play.
TheOriginalOrangeGoblin Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 actually nevermind, it is that way. because springsteen isn't that good. and the beatles are pretty much responsible for the formation of pop group based music as we know it. The Beatles are way more influential but I'd much rather listen to a Springsteen album than any Beatles album. I agree with the others in that the covers of their work are much better than their own music.
Guest blame that goot. Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 Thread took a turn for the dumb.
Jaxxson Mayhem Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 Thread took a turn for the good. Fixed. I'm glad to see other people don't like the beatles.
Nighthawk Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 "The Beatles ruined music." - Beavis and Butthead
Edwin MacPhisto Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 Who on earth does a good Beatles cover?
Nighthawk Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 You're just fucking wrong, ok? This is not something we can debate. Disagree til you're blue in the face. It's retarded.
Steviekick Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 Type O Negative's "Daytripper" medley is pretty good, but I like that sound. If someone who sounds like Type O can adequately play your song, it shows your a great songwriter. The Beatles wrote some great songs, I just like other people playing them.
PUT THAT DICK IN MY MOUTH! Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 Who on earth does a good Beatles cover?
Ravenbomb Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 You're just fucking wrong, ok? This is not something we can debate. Disagree til you're blue in the face. It's retarded. Me?
King Kamala Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 I thought I read the dumbest music related statement of the day when a friend told me in an AIM conversation that the professor of the class on Dylan he's taking thought "Joey" was one of Dylan's finest moments...I was wrong. Of course now someone is going to say Dylan sucks and derail this thread even more.
Nighthawk Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 You're just fucking wrong, ok? This is not something we can debate. Disagree til you're blue in the face. It's retarded. Me? Not specifically, since you were just talking about covers? Which I'm lukewarm about. But this whole anti Beatles thing is misplaced. They are much better songwriters than musicians (and better composers than anything), but they're still the fucking Beatles. There're no legitimate reason to dislike the Beatles, and if you think there is, you are wrong.
Ravenbomb Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 Oh, I don't dislike the Beatles. I just like other bands more.
Jaxxson Mayhem Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 You're just fucking wrong, ok? This is not something we can debate. Disagree til you're blue in the face. It's retarded. Me? Not specifically, since you were just talking about covers? Which I'm lukewarm about. But this whole anti Beatles thing is misplaced. They are much better songwriters than musicians (and better composers than anything), but they're still the fucking Beatles. There're no legitimate reason to dislike the Beatles, and if you think there is, you are wrong. Actually I'm right. I'm fucking sick of all the dickriding that goes on when it comes to the beatles.
Nighthawk Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 I'm not rocking any dicks, and you're a fucking dumbass.
Jaxxson Mayhem Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 No. For people to say "the beatles are the greatest ever and no one can say otherwise" is fucking dumb.
Nighthawk Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 I know. I don't even like the Beatles that much, that's the worst thing about this. What I said was there was no reason to dislike them, and there isn't. To say that because they're over rated they somehow suck, that's what's stupid.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 This all grew out of someone saying that it wasn't ok to like Springsteen more than the Beatles right?
Edwin MacPhisto Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 Who on earth does a good Beatles cover? joe cocker'd That's the only one I could think of, yeah. I remember hearing some Our Lady Peace ones that were pretty much the worst thing ever. That is to be expected with Our Lady Peace, though.
Nighthawk Posted April 23, 2008 Report Posted April 23, 2008 This all grew out of someone saying that it wasn't ok to like Springsteen more than the Beatles right? Hell, I like Anal Cunt more than the Beatles. The point is you can't say they aren't any good because they aren't the best ever.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now