SuperJerk

Thinking Britney Spears was hot back in 1999 made me feel dirty for a completely different reason than it does now.

When he did speak, he was fond of using the term "super genius" to describe himself.

Nobody cares.

No.

Or maybe it's just a message board handle. i am teh pwn3d.

I can't read this thread's complete title without hearing Wile E. Coyote's voice in my head.

I'd make the obvious comparison to another right-wing pudgy white guy who failed at everything in life until he was able to persuade millions of people to do his bidding through scapegoating and half-truths, but we all know how that goes around here. Sufficed to say, his accomplishments do not impress me in the slightest.

I had to pull this old chestnut out.

Is he the Radiohead expert? A world of "no". Apparently I'm now Alanis Morissette's number one fan, though. Man in Blak = the King of Spelling. Ironic, don't you think?

http://www.buzzscope.com/features.php?id=1259

<----------

He did repeat it a few times with different variations, so maybe he was serious. He may be well-read and educated, but the dude ain't smart. WHO is well-read and educated? Limbaugh the freshman year of college drop-out?

--PWI I'm an agnostic, and even I'm offended by that.

"Who Wants to Live Forever?" by Queen

I'm honestly not offended by the Eddie stuff. I just think its kind of stupid.

That's pretty much 75% of what we're getting now on Impact anyways.

Because maybe Foley doesn't think that sodas rule? Don't forget about kazoos.

And here I thought part of the annoucers job was to help make the matches seem real. Silly me. If anything, talking OVER a pinning predicament is stupid becuase it tells the viewers that what they are currently seeing isn't particularly important, whereas in a real wrestling match a pinning predicament would be the most important thing.

Er, you're the one who brought a thread to Site Feedback. If you didn't want to bring attention to him, then what exactly were you trying to do? First of all, you seem to be under the false impression my John Cena thread was intended for anything other than attempts at comedy. I find it hilarious you didn't get that, especially considering what the very first thing I posted in that thread was: That really should have been an indication I wasn't taking it seriously at all. So then some guy posts just to piss me off, so I decided to play along. How should you have known I was just playing along? I posted this: Apparently my big-ass anvil of subtlety was a little to difficult for you to understand. Or maybe you misplaced your "big-ass anvil of subtlety" when you went all the way over the top by creating a thread in Site Feedback about it. Yes, I quoted it twice, because it's that stupid. He needs to stop annoying you because it's easy? </TheMikeSC> Once again, let's get back to the point you keep sidestepping. Why start the thread? If you started it as a joke, then why bring it to Site Feedback, that untapped source of ha-ha for the whole forum, and say the guy was a troll? Or what, are you going to reach across the internet and beat me up? Good lord. You posted your shit in Site Feedback, that pretty much puts the scope of the discussion in site feedback. Which is the folder we're in. Too bad Alanis Morrissette isn't here to sing a song about your real bitching about my fake bitching. Plus you hid it in a post from 7 months ago, which just makes you a pussy.

I just found my quote of the week.

Quiet now, I'm responding to your last post by editing my first post in the thread. That's why Black Baby Jesus invented the edit button. edit: rule of thumb on editing posts...only edit when it was the very last thing you posted. Some forums are strict about their anti-double posting rules.

That's why you quote the guy in your post instead of just typing a new line. That way if he does change something, people will know what you're talking about.

Er, you're the one who brought a thread to Site Feedback. If you didn't want to bring attention to him, then what exactly were you trying to do? First of all, you seem to be under the false impression my John Cena thread was intended for anything other than attempts at comedy. I find it hilarious you didn't get that, especially considering what the very first thing I posted in that thread was: That really should have been an indication I wasn't taking it seriously at all. So then some guy posts just to piss me off, so I decided to play along. How should you have known I was just playing along? I posted this: If his goal was to annoy me, he needs to find something to do with his time that is more challenging. Apparently my big-ass anvil of subtlety was a little to difficult for you to understand. Now, apparently some people got that I was kidding around, based on the first few responses in this very thread. Then thick-headed simpletons like you (but not just you) come along and start to actually mount a serious argument that I was wrong to attack the guy. Well, I stand by the assessment that the guy was a troll, but I never advocated getting him banned since I actually was finding his antics amusing. Second, people (i.e. you) should think about not commenting on what goes on in a folder you admit you don't even post in. See above.

Mysterio could have said no, but then he would have buried on TV. WWE could have told him not to go to the funeral, and use his career as a bargaining chip. Either way, the WWE was going to use Eddie's death one way or another. Yes, he could quit on principle, but I'm beginning to think that he thought this was a good idea at the start. And it might have been, if he had been working on a real TV show or on a real sport. But WWE is neither. Or maybe this, like a certain other bad angle involving Eddie, was actually Rey's idea?

http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/colum...amveltri03.html Have you read a single fucking post in this thread? You honestly think we only dislike Cena because of his workrate?