Slayer

Besides, I thought we called moratorium on first-person references to sports teams

Watch Adam f'king Vinatieri lead the Colts to a SB title

Watch the Ravens do something like return a fumble or blocked FG for a TD

I have no idea who this is. Then, enjoy the greatest promo of all time: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_1Z9Dj6tdw His forehead is disgusting. It looks like his brain is trying to escape from his skull

Thought it'll be ironic if Peyton makes the SB while doing fuck all on the field ...or maybe it wouldn't

Shit, I just realized this game might end AwShucks' winless postseason streak outside the AFC West

Which coach can out-choke the other!

The way you guys are talking though makes it sound like if I have space in my memory to remember old useless threads on a message board, I must not be able to simultaneously remember important things like paying next month's mortgage "He remembers important things, which is good, but he remembers insignificant things too, so he sucks!"

Because you can only have a finite number of memories!

"That was uncalled for... but a lot of fun to watch!"

"The Anaheim Mighty Ducks"

Just another reason to riot

Fun fact: In two out of the previous three seasons ('03-'05), two road teams won on division weekend. Before '03, the last time was '95, and before that, '87.

To further my earlier post about the Pats and Chargers game, I don't think I've ever seen a divisional playoff weekend where the 1-2 seeds looked so vulnerable. I could see three or possibly all four losing this weekend.

Only in Banky's world would having a good memory be considered a character fault

The Earth will not crash into the Sun

I'm sure Malia is capable of posting her own pictures

Sid may not have been great in the ring (though his kip-up was amazing), but I always thought he was entertaining, whether through his interviews, in-ring mannerisms or out-of-ring incidents (stabby stabby)

That's the worst kind!

You go through the archives, find an old thread, and then make a post so that it appears in the current forum ...what kind of question is this

Byron is my new favorite poster

'04, yes '03, no, because Green Bay won their game. Had Green Bay lost, then Minnesota would still have gone in spite of the Arizona loss, and that would be a prime example of "backing in" As Lex Luger would say: "I DON'T KNOWWWWWW!"

I disagree with the first statement about the interchangability of games I kind of agree with you about the use of backing into the playoffs. I think the term has merit though. Say you have teams A and B. If A wins, they make the playoffs. If they lose and B wins, B goes and A is out. I say A backs in to the playoffs if they lose and then B loses, allowing A to make the playoffs in spite of losing. It doesn't even need to apply to just making the playoffs. I remember in '00 when the Vikings had a solid division lead through most of the season, then dropped three straight at the end of the season and only won the division and #2 seed because Tampa lost their last game of the season

When I first saw commercials for Borat, I ignored them because I thought it was a standard fish-out-of-water "I am simple foreigner here in your crazy country" bit. When I found out was it was really about... I still didn't have much interest in seeing it.