Vyce

You know, it's a shame that JBL isn't as good in the ring as he is on the mike, cause if he was, he'd be fucking awesome. BTW, technically, isn't Booker right? Orlando pretty much IS Bradshaw's house boy.

And yet ANOTHER Diva reject. Yeah, it was so totally worth firing Nidia & Gail Kim for these broads.

Here's a better question, Tazz: Hiroko's an actually attractive woman without all of that shit on, why don't they let her dress normally instead of playing up to a stupid stereotype?

I dunno if that was a Fox show, but it ruled for the theme song alone "This is the theme to Garry's show..." The theme song ruled. "This is the theme to Gary's show.....the theme to Gary's show.....Gary called me up and asked if I would write his theme song...." Sliders originally began on FOX, and was a pretty decent show. Unfortunately, it got cancelled, as is the way of things - Sci-Fi picked it up, but at that point half of the original cast left and the stories just got completely ridiculous.

Him and Miz at times... Rey Rey! Yeah, but at least Puder actually seems to have some athletic ability. At this point, if anyone has to win, I'd rather it be him, just so I can see him keylock more of the WWE locker room.

Is this another one of the worthless Diva Search rejects?

Can we just end this stupid shit early and give Puder the contract?

Which was fucking GREAT, I might add. I love that game.

What is really the point of these awful fucking skits? We're supposed to determine who should win a million dollar contract based upon nonsense like "Who makes out with the old hag the best" or "Capture the Flag"?

The Bashams are out! And the crowd goes mild!

This is why, outside of all of his other nonsense, Bill is a brilliant politician - he's smart enough to realize that the current president is popular with a considerable portion of the electorate and that it pays more in the end to treat him with respect rather than complete and utter disdain. It's a lesson that the mainstream Democrat party hasn't gotten yet, and likely NEVER will.

The pendulum is swinging again towards me just thinking you're a moron. While I do gain great amusement from watching others totally tool on you for your completely ignorant beliefs, you seriously just should stop talking about all things Middle East, since you couldn't buy a clue if someone handed you a million bucks.

No. Yes. C'mon, Mike, it's been well-established that the impeachment was just part of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy.™

*puts head in hands* Why can't it just be Evil Dead 4 like we all want? You just WATCH, they'll fucking cast Mischa Barton as Linda.

I honestly don't mind Natalie Portman's small tirts. I mean, shit, I wouldn't be kicking THAT out of my bed just because she ain't top-heavy.

That's VERY much open to debate.

I don't think Bendis really gives a shit about anything written before he picked up pen and put it to paper.

You know, I'm reminded of the great verbal bitchslaps that FK Teale used to lay down upon Frank Zappa Mask whenever FZM would post something equally as moronic. They were things of beauty. I wish I had archived them for posturity.

UGH to Barton as Lois. Can we please try and cast a REAL actress for this role, not whichever young starlet is currently in the nation's most popular teen show? Law as Zod would be fucking kingsized. KNEEL BEFORE ZOD.

The thing that I kept thinking about after reading the issue was: the League had better count their blessing that Bats is and always will be a hero - because if he were to ever find out about what they did to him, he could fuck them up ROYALLY if so motivated. He's probably the guy you'd least want to have a vendetta against you. He knows what they did. At least Green Arrow sure seems to hint that he does... Green Arrow only mentioned that Bats is a detective - so he's likely figured out that something happened on the station that was shady. I don't think he actually knows the other JLA members mindfucked him. I must say, though, Bats reaction to what they were doing to Light was perfectly done - I could picture him going absolutely fucking BALLISTIC if he were to walk in on that.

'Insurgents' aren't terrorists. They are Iraqi people who have taken up arms against their occupiers. There is a world of difference between groups like those that behead hostages and those Iraqi people that are fighting against an illegal and cruel occupation. I like to think that deep down I'm a nice guy, so I alternate between just thinking you're woefully ignorant of the world around you, and, in my darker moments, just considering you to be a fucking moron. There has been a wealth of information that has been published through various media sources that details the composition of the insurgent forces - do yourself a favor and look it up. You'll see that the majority of insurgents are FOREIGN fighters. And a great number of those who are Iraqi are former Saddam military personnel. They're hardly innocent civilians staging an uprising against the imperialistic American oppressors. BTW, I excised the rest of your post, but I just have to say, you considering yourself to have any sort of opinion that resembles neutrality on this issue is, by its very definition. laughable.

So how long before this guy begins a war with the surface-dwellers?

Question: By that token, do you also condem the shooting of the Iraqi in cold blood, insurgent or not? The fucker was shooting at Marines and more than a few insurgents have grenades, IEDs, or pistols hidden away. By the way, do you know anything about basic infantry SOPs, mission specific SOPs related to Fallujah, Marine AIT infantry training, the UCMJ, MOUT tactics, or the Geneva Convention? You don't?! Then maybe you, and most people in this thread, should shut your fucking mouth. I'm aware of the basics of the Geneva Convention and usually look it up for referencing as news breaks, so yes. I'm also aware of what constitutes a war crime. So no, I won't 'shut up' when pointing out a blatant injustice. Terrorists are not covered by the Geneva Convention. And again - I have to sit back and laugh bitterly at people like C-Bacon here, who will go out of their way to completely demonize American soldiers over one incident - when we don't know all the facts and the soldier may yet be absolved - and conveniently ignore how the other side treats ITS prisoners. If this were a story of insurgents capturing an American GI, of course, it would be a story about how the insurgents beheaded the soldier or killed him in some other fashion, because 99.99% of the time THAT is how the insurgents treat THEIR prisoners. Yet somehow it's the Americans who are the true villains here. Which this ONE incident "proves." This ONE, isolated incident. Where we don't even know all the facts. At least C-Bacon is predictable in his foolishness. But then again, what am I to expect from someone who quotes Chomsky in his sig?

I don't know why, but this just seems to scream "tabloid-fodder" to me. Something about this doesn't "smell" right. What? The shark apparently being as big as a chopper or that it shredded her and then rose out of the water to swallow her whole? If it's true, leave the poor creature alone. I mean, what will be the scientific purpose of killing the shark? .......revenge. And Vyce nails it. Way to go. A humble lay-up, thanks to your assist. Watch this.

I don't know why, but this just seems to scream "tabloid-fodder" to me. Something about this doesn't "smell" right. What? The shark apparently being as big as a chopper or that it shredded her and then rose out of the water to swallow her whole? If it's true, leave the poor creature alone. I mean, what will be the scientific purpose of killing the shark? .......revenge.