Jobber of the Week

So, Israel puts absolutely no innocents at risk when they run a tank through the city street or use helicopter-launched missiles and blow up an entire comlex in an effort to kill one person?

*snort*

Did you see Dean telling Gephardt to fuck off on TV the other day? HI-LARIOUS! Go, Howie, you'll beat Jimmy Dean yet (although I think Jimmy locked in the omlette vote)

But will he be able to properly eat a pretzel?

It reminds me of the guy who wore a pin-on button that said "SUSPECTED TERRORIST" as a sign of how the administration wants to investigate all our lives to make sure we're not going to blow up a building. He wore it through the government's passenger security checkpoint without problem. He explained the meaning of the button to the passengers around them so they'd understand, asked them if they were uncomfortable with it, and when they said they didn't mind him wearing the button, a stewardess asked him to take off the button because it made people uncomfortable. He refused and said he'd talked to all those within eyesight of it and she had security throw him off the plane. Later, he had a talk with a woman from the airline who admitted that they'd have no problem with a "Go Bush!" button but then had no answer as to the problem with this one. Now, is it smart to wear stuff like that in these areas? Not really. But should we have the right to? Absolutely. People like this are probably just trying to stir up attention, but bless them because if they were silent the rest of us would never know that those rights were taken from us.

^The hell did this come from?^

I don't think we should do that, but I do think we should give money to Israel under the same rules we give money to other countries. Over multiple payments, instead of one lump sum. We also need to make sure when we say "Here, have this money, just don't spend it on weapons and military" that they actually do that. What we do right now is write a blank check, and we don't do that for any other countries. Despite what the right-wingers want to say, neither side has a moral high ground. Israel puts as many innocents at risk with it's tanks as innocent Israelis are at risk by terrorist bombers.

Fox I can understand. But Savage deserves all the criticism he gets, him and the Media Whore, where this comes from btw. If the ACLU dropped this I'd support them, but they won't and thus I'll take their good and their bad but support neither.

Much like how not all Israelis want to develop settlements on that land and everything else Sharon is doing, not all Palestinians want to blow up Israelis. This is like saying how Southerners would never stop being racist as the children would be taught by the generation who were using blacks as slaves, and so on. While we still have Trent Lott and a few southerners that are thinking backwards, that's no longer a majority.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...5-2003Oct1.html

You know, there are bad parties that have actual support you should actually care about. Britain's nazi-like National Party, for example. Glad to have you back, OlympicSlam. Your game of making mountains out of molehills to jump to conclusions will be a welcome change from TheMikeSC's game of splitting hairs and pulling facts out of the ass to jump to conclusions. (I'm being sincere btw, and hopefully you'll actually debate with people instead of stick your fingers in your ears, because I'm getting tired of that act, too)

Oh come on. Freedom of Speech is all cool as long as it's on your side, and when it's not it ought to be on sight.

Mmm. The ratings have done nothing but drop since Fuck Goldberg has become champ.

Well even Bush said a few weeks ago that there was no connection to Hussein and the 9/11 attacks. Marney went off on connections with people who have connections to Al-Qaeda, but that's a different story than aiding them pull off the attacks.

It's hard to find information from the source on that kind of thing since it's not too happy a subject and thus they don't like to dwell on it. I thought I had a gambling addiction flyer from one of my trips but it appears I don't. They can punt out anyone they like, which they often do to card counters at single-shoe BlackJack places. Also at card games, they can close a table if they want a person to take their chips and go. The Mirage, one of the more premier places on the Strip, has a page that says among other things: And that's about as close as I got. Again, they don't like to dwell on it.

Part 2 of Macho's XM appearances, this one's quite better as it's with another 90s DJ, who didn't like him and destroyed a copy of his CD on the air prior. The sad part is when Savage says "I'm as good a wrestler as I am a rapper!" MP3 link

Does that mean that nobody wants to go home? I can tell you that's not a fact because I've had someone over there complain to me in the past few weeks about the lack of concrete information on this. He doesn't MIND being over there, not at all, but wants to know when he can leave.

Can't think of any time I've ever seen that as a rule in war. If it was so, we'd have Germany and a few Arab countries now.

Not sure what the laws are regarding Riverboarts, but over in Vegas there's plenty of laws about gambling addiction. All the hotels provide a phamplet with phone numbers etc and how to recognize an addiction. Casinos shouldn't have to bear full responsibility, but they should have SOME responsibility, and to whatever extent Vegas is doing, it's worked. I do, however, find it funny that the "victim" shares the same name with San Fran's mayor.

Angle Video. Sold.

You think maybe it's intentionally made that way? I mean, it's as good an excuse to get Coach into the Teddy Long stable as any.

I still can't believe they talked about making Mother Teresa a saint. Mother Teresa's whole M.O. in life was showing what a person could do without having to be a saint or other such title.

It's the NWO clause, of course. [controversial_statement]The whip match was only there so JR could whip away at a shirtless black man as crowd spectacle.[/controversial_statement] Now chew on THAT.

THAT IS A STEAK BELT, HOGAN! AND MY BELT IS FILET MIGNON! God, I'd pay for a clip of that. EDIT: I'm still shocked that Vince treated that belt with a measure of respect instead of having it chucked in a garbage can or something as part of an angle. Then again, since it was technically owned by Flair, I'm guessing he wouldn't go for that as it'd seriously burn some bridges.

You initially bashed all boomers because of the stereotype that you now say does not represent most boomers. God. Your head must be made of pure stone.