Annabelle

half of you fags cried when guerrero died, so how is this different? he just said to the funker before he croaks. sad but true. this is no different than any other deaths in any form of entertainment that people pine over. ie. john lennon. this guy was just man enough to do it before said wrestlers do die. y'all will be wimpering whenever terry kicks the can.

geez these worthless head shots must really be worth it! i wonder when all of these wrestlers are gonna wake the fuck up. wake up. wake up. you know what? i find it horrible that he has to go through this, but on the other hand, all of these wrestlers need to start respecting themselves enough to say no to getting their brains smashed with a chair. how stupid is that, honestly? do you watch wrestling for these retarded chair shots? im sure some of you, but you're idiots anyways.

i can usually tell if i'll like a band by simply looking at a picture of them. its sad but true.

i have never heard this band before, nor do i ever want to.

he's kidding, kiddies but i think mole could kick my ass

i think craig was drunk. boy, craig is small. i watched the whole thing, though. good work.

he used to be really good.

it won't suck, but it certainly won't be as much fun. but what do white boys know about black comedy? like, seriously..

as if your professor didn't think you were a complete dolt.

but listening to a modern band on vinyl is the original experience. naturally most of the copies will be on the cd format, the aforementioned anolog aspect demonstrates that any album on vinyl is the original experience - and the closest that the listener will get to what the artist/group is attempting to accomplish.

i think vinyl is cheaper to produce than cds. cds don't have better sound than records, either. thats a popular misconception. vinyl are made from the authentic analog tapes from recording sessions. with cds, they are digitalized snapshots that simply cannot capture the authentic sound of said analog. as far as agent's discussion goes. i don't have a car stereo as mine was jacked several months ago. so cds in that respect are useless to me. the conveniance of an ipod has truly rendered the cd useless in every other respect. all one needs to do is forgo the cd player, buy a nice receiver/amp. they can get a jack to hook their ipod up to it. now they have the best of both worlds. in my opinion. not only is listening to vinyl an intimate experience, so is the 30-60 seconds of cleaning it before putting it on. carefully placing the needle down & watching it cut through the grooves. sure the albums deteriorate each time one listens to it, but how outwardly noticeable is it? its a natural sound that isn't as tampered with as all of the numerous remastered & new mixes for classic albums. it just seems more natural. as if i haven't sued the word natural enough.

ignore

this folder has become one big inside joke. and i can't stand it. well, i can as 95% of the people in it i have ON IGNORE. Hoffman is next. and cwm please don't pm me asking why you are banned from bankyland. you know why.

this fucker is feeling the crunch over a 2-3 page essay? what is he in grade 5. good god, i could shit one of those fuckers out in an hour - tops. about wrestling no less, a subject the professor/teacher probably has very little knowledge of. just say your shit. b.s.

when did hoff start acting like banky? geezus

yea it is. dylan has said so himself. and anyone who takes musical advice from the vh1 & their talking head panel outta is a fool

you can't do that with vinyl? i'm not saying buying music will become extinct. just that cd sales will probably sag more & more. no one says you have to sell your cd collection, either. just that i find purchsing them nowadays to be a fruitless venture.

most people who don't like the sound of vinyl don't have a good amp...or output to get its optimum value. thus, a lot of the imperfections are compounded. vinyl looks nicer. but thats not all. i noticed someone said they enjoyed cds because of their practicality. and that is the regular answer as to why most prefer cds. but for the greatest listening experience of an album, vinyl si the way to go. firstly, you can't just put a turntable on random & allow it to spit out songs. you must go out of your way to pick an album, and dedicate yourself to it. you must be around, or be paying close enough attention to turn the album over when each side is done. you have to get up, and turn that album over. and in most instances, albums are designed for that feature. especially in the olden days side a & side b have been selected closely. furthermore, most albums from the earlier years in music are a lot more concise in duration. now with cds there is so much extra garbage tacked onto an album because they can. with vinyl, outside of a few double albums, the music goes on for only 30-40+ minutes which is usually what msot great albums come in at. any longer than that the listening experience becomes a lot more laboursome. of course there are exceptions. edit: most suckers now are forced to pay 10 extra bucks for worthless outtakes on a bowie album when they could just go to their vinyl store & find young americans for 2 dollars. it all seems so much more practical to me to get vinyl in that sense. now with ipods, i can detect that cds may eventually go the way of tapes. maybe.

which do you prefer & why?

billy cobhams best work was with miles. he had one decent solo album, but he just slipped into the general monotony of fusion as a leader. as i stated earlier, tony williams did it the most effectively...out of almost everyone at that time. even miles...sometimes.

i always liked pryor. he inspired the other hilarious black stand up comedians; murphy, rock, chappelle. he deserves that.

NOOO! i still would rather see him wrestle than anyone on raw. booyah there's something quite reaffirming in that picture. the fact that macho is willing to look like an old man as opposed to a woman beating dyed hair white rapper is good to see.

idiots. are you saying some fucker from pantara had more hardcore bands than the fuckign leader of the motherfucking BEATLES? the biggest rock band of all-fucking-time? more hardcore fans than the BEATLES? have you ever heard of the BEATLES? or what the BEATLES did? THE BEATLES. and even if his position in the peace movement has been overblown, lennon's solo work yielded many-a-smelly hippy to hang off his every word. i can't believe i am even trying to justify this argument with the braindeads in this folder.

you try too hard to be hip to the wrestling jive. give it up, man. you sound silly.

you're the worst.