Dr. Zaius

Damn it! And I even checked my satelitte menu to see what it would be and it didn't mention it!

As much as we complain about the tastelessness, some people apparently eat it up. (Remember how the Dominick segments got better ratings than anything else on Smackdown last year?) Wrestling is not a business where the acceptable norms of behavior are generally applicable, it would seem.

I honestly can't make up my mind, since I hate them both so much I only watch Smackdown now.

Oh my God...

Why didn't he just use THAT thread for the OAO?

They can always release another one later. I've never seen a Samoa Joe PPV match, so I'm looking forward to seeing this.

This must have been good for him to come back and delete it later.

That was totally counterproductive at doing anything other than making a small segment of the crowd feel bad for John Cena the person (as opposed to John Cena, the shitty character). I suspect it is now time for the Internet Wrestling Community to decide who the hate less, Triple H or John Cena. It is sad that it has come to this. Fortunately, Kurt Angle does not have this problem.

*goes back to check* I never knew that was PSH. "Red meat, we crave sustenance! " To me he will always be Scotty from Boogie Nights.

It is difficult to understand, in the era of V-chips and TV ratings, why parents need an organization like the PTC to tell them what shows are good for their children. The PTC, of course, has a right to voice their finding and opinions in a public setting, however (more times than not) these findings are used to incite people who already think TV shows are too violent or sexual into voting a certain way, rather than actually monitoring their children more closely. In addition, the idea that violence on TV caused some children to not be as concerned as their parents about 9/11 can be attributed to a multitude of other reasons (children are unfamiliar with the concept of terrorism, unable to grasp the number of victims, general immaturity and self-centeredness especially in regards to teenagers). It is a knee-jerk reaction to blame violence on TV for that. It has been documents time and again that children in other countries who are exposed to American television do not suffer from the alledged desensitization that American children are. The PTC, I feel, is attempting to present a correlation as proof.

http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/play_uk.php?id=760355

Ingenius.

http://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/rawspoilers They cannot even write spoilers that do not sound like mindless hype.

I'm leaning towards Austin at #1, Lesnar at #2, HBK at #3, Triple H at #4 (although I've no idea as to why his sorry matches with Triple H deserve to be considered a better feud than Benoit). Outside chance: Jericho?

Have any studies been done on the long-term effects of silicone implants on brain chemistry?

Sounds like it might at least be a good match.

Eh?

Idiots. Here's what they actually said about it:

I'd have had HHH turn on Hogan at Backlash 2002, retain the title, and joined the NWO.

I've always wondered who these "press conferences" were done for anyways. Where are they held? Who is the audience? I just don't get it.

You should try harder next time.

Given how many conspiracy theories there were about both the Oklahoma City bombing and the incident in Waco, I would say psychotic ramblings are a bipartisan affair.

Claiming to be a genius then blowing youself up repeatedly tends to leave an impression with people.

Yeah, I love the way Hollywood portrays troubled inner-city schools as just needing one good white person to save all the kids and make them care.

I don't want to incur a head-ache inducing quote-a-thon, so I'll just make my comments and rely on your own intelligence to sort it out. I think if you'd made that last point first, your reaction to him would have made sense to me sooner. There's no way to know for sure whether or not he was kidding the whole time. According to him, he was kidding about the Cena thread, then kidding about the thread in the feedback folder. He did attempt to cite evidence from his own posts that would back up his own claim by pointing to the more ridicules posts of his own as proof. Given that it was certainly not evident he was kidding around (for every one thing that sounded like a joke, he'd post 4 or more things that sounded serious) your theory has merit. I think you made your point about his constant post editing in your "time paradox" post, which I found amusing. I just didn't get the point of harping on him about misspelling "Morissette," since he was probably only mentioning her and her idiotic "Ironic" song just to throw your comment about irony back in your face (albeit in the most unoriginal way possible since that joke's been around since 1995 or so). As far as why he kept responding to you, despite the assertion that he wasn't serious, instead of laughing it off, could either be because (a) he actually was serious, or (b) he was so amused you took it seriously he couldn't stop yanking your chain. Neither of you looks particularly like "winners" right now because of this.