Pitchers per plate appearance aside (I concede Adam Dunn sees more pitches than I thought) I'd much rather him put the ball in play if I'm a Reds fan. If there's a runner on third base with less than two outs, I really don't want a high-strikeout guy at the plate.
By the way, have you heard of three true outcomes. A baseball player has control over three things: homeruns, walks and strikeouts. Everything else is completely in the hands of the defense, park effects, and a bunch of other stuff that has nothing to do with the batter at all. That's why we have a thing called BABIP (Batting Average on Balls in Play). Over a large enough sample, all players will have about a .300 average on balls that are put into play. There's no skill there. That's why batting averages are all over the map from year to year and OBP stays relatively consistent.
Are you sure you're...explaining that right? Are you telling me that a regular base hit has more to do with park effects than a Home Run? And if all players hit .300 over balls put in play then doesn't that reinforce the point that putting balls in player is better than striking out?