Guest hunger4unger Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 In the latest edition of the Wrestling Observer newsletter, Meltzer says that Vince McMahon vs The Undertaker in a buried alive match has been pencilled in for Survvor Series. Thoughts~!
Guest webmasterofwrestlegame Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 I'd imagine that will be rubbed straight out after the latest Taker main event push draws nothing.
Guest Boo_Bradley Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 The ~EVIL~ will rise from the ground to make one last run,.....before switching gimmicks again to "freshen up" in time for WM 23
Guest hunger4unger Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 RVDMARK: What do you think about this is my point.
cabbageboy Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 I've got no real problem with this if: 1. There is no title on the line here. 2. Vince gets buried.
the pinjockey Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 This blows. If they run with Angle/Eddie at SS, I am going to end up paying for another big McMahon match that will get all the credit.
CanadianChris Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Can we get all the midcarders to run in and bury them both?
Guest Duncan Eternia Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick.
Guest Retro Rob Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick. Why? So they have another reason to push him to the top?
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick. and while they are at it, maybe they should bring back Doink, Duke Droese and every other cartoon gimmick they ever had
Lil' Bitch Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 When was the last time a Buried Alive match happened anyway? Uh, PPV-wise?
Guest wwF1587 Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Now i use to be a fan of buried alive matches, in fact i still mark for them but WHY does the one buried alive match in years have to involve a DAMN MCMAHON!! Arghh....
Slickster Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 When was the last time a Buried Alive match happened anyway? Uh, PPV-wise? IYH: Rock Bottom in December of 1998.
EdwardKnoxII Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Can we get all the midcarders to run in and bury them both? No cause knowing the WWE HHH will run out with Jericho and RVD his shoulders, throw them into the hole and bury them alive.
Guest Trivia247 Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick. and while they are at it, maybe they should bring back Doink, Duke Droese and every other cartoon gimmick they ever had Difference between Taker and every other gimmick out there is that it Worked. I doubt it would work again since He said publically he wouldn't go back to the Deadman gimmick. this shit is just continuation of McMahon's need to be on camera so much that it causes other matches to disappear from the card. And for McMahon to beat Taker. So there would be no wrestler left on the roster that can Intiminate him.
jester Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 The "Undertaker going back to the Deadman" thing is rapidly becoming the new "Raw renamed to Nitro." Any match between Taker and Vince is going to be the focus at the expense of anything else. The only reason why "building new stars takes time" is because they keep focusing on this crap.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 I hope Vince wins. I'd hate to see the companies top star miss TV time.
Damaramu Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 That'd be sad if UT sells for Vince...just sad...
NoCalMike Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 this is quite the lame idea, but then again, nothing new or shocking.
Guest rawmvp Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 What are the other matches being penciled in for Survivor Series?
The Ghost of bps21 Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 I'm sure it's something like... Steph vs. Sable and A-Train Shane vs. Kane II Linda vs. Bischoff You know...money matches.
Ultra Violence Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Linda / Bischoff vs Shane / Jackie Gayda
Ultra Violence Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Linda McMahon / Bischoff vs Shane / Jackie Gayda
RavishingRickRudo Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Oooh goody, this will be like the epic McMahon vs. Mr America feud that took up so much fucking time to accomplish dicknothing.
AndrewTS Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Oooh goody, this will be like the epic McMahon vs. Mr America feud that took up so much fucking time to accomplish dicknothing. It accomplished something--it led to us finally getting rid of Hogan.
nl5xsk1 Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Let me be the first to show the positive spin on this ... if the two old men are fighting each other, they're not fighting anyone else. One horrible match is better than two. And if they were fighting two seperate people, they'd most likely both go over. Prediction - Kane interferes, costing Taker the match.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now