the pinjockey Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 I thought it was set up that whoever had the most points would win the game. Isn't that why you assigned all those point values to stats. As for the 1-0 vs. 4-3 arguement I would prefer just you either win or lose, no winning each stat category. It is easier to track, plus it limits the damage in case some teams decide to quit and give 7-0 wins to the teams who face them late in the season. As opposed to those teams who faced them when they were still playing.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 I agree, I'd much prefer the 1-0 system rather then the 7-0. Just seems easier standings wise too.
razazteca Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 I like the hockey scoring system, its more less a weekly roto league with the win, lose, tie for the stats. 6-7-4 Baby!
Lightning Flik Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 I thought it was set up that whoever had the most points would win the game. Isn't that why you assigned all those point values to stats. As for the 1-0 vs. 4-3 arguement I would prefer just you either win or lose, no winning each stat category. It is easier to track, plus it limits the damage in case some teams decide to quit and give 7-0 wins to the teams who face them late in the season. As opposed to those teams who faced them when they were still playing. Actually, for NHL/NBA you must rack up the most stats in each category. So you need to beat that person for the most categories. At least that's what the original rules stat. Personally, I want to play it so you just have to kick the crap out of my said opponent. Not get lucky and land a 7-0 and basically fuck everyone over as I jump out to a great start. It says that you beat the person if you get the most statistical categories, but in the NHL Smarks League, I know this isn't true. As I beat the Leafs (my opponents) with a 9-7-1 record and ended up with that as my recorded. Not just 1-0-0. Oh bloody hell... *just finished reading rules regarding Head-To-Head* It's the exact same for weekly. Dammit. That means we get stuck with the 7 "games" winning strat. 147 "games" leaves a lot of room for err. I mean, you'd have to have everyone get a lot of 5-2, 5-1-1, 4-3-0, 4-2-1 combos to make it look even close.
Dangerous A Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 With the last pick in the 7th round, Team 2004 selects G Mike Miller With the first pick in the 8th round, Team 2004 selects F Al Harrington Alfdogg, you're next.
razazteca Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 With the Head 2 Head league rule it will be exciting because on any given sunday........er week the team can win. There will be no major blowouts unless the opponet's team is full of scrubs who only play 2 minutes a game or are injuried. The match ups will be naturally competitive, there will be no reason to give up because there is always hope. I petty the fool who gives up.
Lightning Flik Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 With the Head 2 Head league rule it will be exciting because on any given sunday........er week the team can win. There will be no major blowouts unless the opponet's team is full of scrubs who only play 2 minutes a game or are injuried. The match ups will be naturally competitive, there will be no reason to give up because there is always hope. I petty the fool who gives up. This is true. I'll fiddle with the league as soon as the draft is completed and see if I can't get it working to the way we wanted it. If I can, that'll be great. If not, it's 7 "games" per week.
razazteca Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 Hell just add every possible stat then
Lightning Flik Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 Hell just add every possible stat then I might do that... I'll just see what happens and report back to you guys.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 Hm...is it possible to add every possible stat? That'd be kinda weird yet neat to see! Example: Whoo! I'm leading the league in Turnover:Assist ratio!
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 but for the love of god take all the foul categories off. I don't want to get stuck with a "loss" because one of my guys fouls out, you know?
Sandman9000 Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 Give 5,000 points per technical and 6,000,000,000 per suspension, either league or team mandated. I'll win easily, thanks to Artest.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 Nah Sandman...whoever has Rasheed Wallace would pass you by easy
razazteca Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 What time does Alfdog get out of work?
Lightning Flik Posted October 15, 2003 Report Posted October 15, 2003 but for the love of god take all the foul categories off. I don't want to get stuck with a "loss" because one of my guys fouls out, you know? Um... Actually, right now I've only got FGM, FTM, 3PM, PTS, RB, BLK, ST. Until I know otherwise, that's all I'm having.
alfdogg Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 The Alfdogg Asylum selects C Scot Pollard with the 2nd pick of the 8th round.
Lightning Flik Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 And thankfully, I might get to pick up the guy I had in mind this pick. Unless Dawn picks him. And then I'm going to kick myself for picking Morrison.
Guest Mindless_Aggression Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 I'm in favor of the Head 2 Head league rule as well, it sounds like it'd result in the best competition. On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft.
Dangerous A Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft. What can I say, I do my homework when I am picking. I was even more surprised that Pacer fanboy Alfdogg let Al Harrington slip to me this late as well. I was all set to pick up some other guys and lo and behold, Harrington and Miller were still not picked.
Lightning Flik Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft. What can I say, I do my homework when I am picking. I was even more surprised that Pacer fanboy Alfdogg let Al Harrington slip to me this late as well. I was all set to pick up some other guys and lo and behold, Harrington and Miller were still not picked. I think the reasoning some people got missed is because a lot of people went with certain categories (as did I), or needed to pick up some roleplayers in the final rounds. Oh and I like head-to-head, but I'd prefer just kicking the shit out my opponent for a single win. Not hoping to God I steal a 5-2 victory.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 I was shocked that Lakers fanboy MrJ picked LeBron James when PG Gary Payton was available.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 Let me do a quick research, had to get rid of a virus..*shakes fist*
HarleyQuinn Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 Harley: The Gotham Harlequins select Guard Marcus Banks with the 3rd Pick in the 8th Round.
alfdogg Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft. What can I say, I do my homework when I am picking. I was even more surprised that Pacer fanboy Alfdogg let Al Harrington slip to me this late as well. I was all set to pick up some other guys and lo and behold, Harrington and Miller were still not picked. Well, I was actually going to pick Harrington if Prince was gone. I figure Larry Brown is smart enough to stick with him after the nice playoffs he had.
razazteca Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 4) Lightning Flik 5) cartman 6) Sandman9000
Lightning Flik Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 Crimson Storm pick: Mason, Desmond (GF-Mil) Yes, he is available. to everyone.
Sandman9000 Posted October 16, 2003 Report Posted October 16, 2003 Fear The Slayers select Jamaal Tinsley.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now