Dr. Tom Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 B-X, if you're going to flamebait people like that, do it in NHB.
Anakin Flair Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 Dean's comments over the past decade show that, perhaps more than any other candidate in the field, he has switched or modified key positions as a presidential contender. Because he rarely speaks from scripts, he also tends to make more off-the-cuff statements that land him in hot water. Kerry recently said Dean makes way too many verbal "gaffes" to be president. Yeah, and Bush has a book of all of his verbal "gaffes" out in bookstores now.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 BTW, the word is spelt "perennially", dipshit. I think "asscheek" is two words, but who knows how it's spelled in England...
Vyce Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 Why would they be embarassed? It's not like he called a press conference specifically on that, he just said it during his speech today in Georgia (I think... not sure where he was). He was probably even asked a question about it. Really now, Tyler, when you're running for president, how much more fucking pandering and useless can you get by trying to make THIS an issue in your quest to get elected? Is he even trying to choose what he says carefully? JMA - than Mike was wrong. It's a stupid and altogether petty way to insult someone.
Guest JMA Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 JMA - than Mike was wrong. It's a stupid and altogether petty way to insult someone. Indeed it is.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 JMA - than Mike was wrong. It's a stupid and altogether petty way to insult someone. Indeed it is. Then I apologize for it. I can find more useful ways to tear into you --- and will do so from now on. -=Mike --- Sweet, ain't I?
Guest JMA Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 Then I apologize for it. I can find more useful ways to tear into you --- and will do so from now on. -=Mike --- Sweet, ain't I? Always have to try to get the last word in, don't ya? Well, if you'd like to use this to start some juvenile vendetta against me--be my guest. Just realize that I won't be responding in kind.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Then I apologize for it. I can find more useful ways to tear into you --- and will do so from now on. -=Mike --- Sweet, ain't I? Always have to try to get the last word in, don't ya? Well, if you'd like to use this to start some juvenile vendetta against me--be my guest. Just realize that I won't be responding in kind. I don't have a vendetta against anybody here. I don't know you. I don't CARE about you. You are an anonymous person posting on a message board. Shockingly enough, that doesn't really generate any passion in me. I will continue to undress you on this board --- as you are so wrong on so many levels, it's borderline comical. -=Mike
Guest JMA Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 I don't have a vendetta against anybody here. I don't know you. I don't CARE about you. You are an anonymous person posting on a message board. Shockingly enough, that doesn't really generate any passion in me. I will continue to undress you on this board --- as you are so wrong on so many levels, it's borderline comical. This from the guy who called Ann Coulter an "intelligent" woman (until I showed him some quotes). Not to mention calling everyone who disagrees with him "sheep." And you OBVIOUSLY care about me, seeing as you waste precious time with your immature little jabs. You've never "proven" me to be wrong on anything that I can recall, so you couldn't "continue" to prove me wrong. You have to start first. Get on that.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 I don't have a vendetta against anybody here. I don't know you. I don't CARE about you. You are an anonymous person posting on a message board. Shockingly enough, that doesn't really generate any passion in me. I will continue to undress you on this board --- as you are so wrong on so many levels, it's borderline comical. This from the guy who called Ann Coulter an "intelligent" woman (until I showed him some quotes). Not to mention calling everyone who disagrees with him "sheep." And you OBVIOUSLY care about me, seeing as you waste precious time with your immature little jabs. You've never "proven" me to be wrong on anything that I can recall, so you couldn't "continue" to prove me wrong. You have to start first. Get on that. That's the first time I've ever seen JMA burn someone. Damn, yo. That's some shit. Mike should just shoot himself in the face now.
Guest JMA Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 That's the first time I've ever seen JMA burn someone. Damn, yo. That's some shit. Mike should just shoot himself in the face now. To be fair, he does most of the "burning" himself. It's just a matter of pointing it out.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 I don't have a vendetta against anybody here. I don't know you. I don't CARE about you. You are an anonymous person posting on a message board. Shockingly enough, that doesn't really generate any passion in me. I will continue to undress you on this board --- as you are so wrong on so many levels, it's borderline comical. This from the guy who called Ann Coulter an "intelligent" woman (until I showed him some quotes). Not to mention calling everyone who disagrees with him "sheep." And you OBVIOUSLY care about me, seeing as you waste precious time with your immature little jabs. You've never "proven" me to be wrong on anything that I can recall, so you couldn't "continue" to prove me wrong. You have to start first. Get on that. Umm, "sheep" is hardly a frequently used jab by me. Don't know who you're referring to on that one. I'm presently watching the Eagles/'Skins game and I'm bored, so I'm here and you happen to be here. I don't seek you out. Maybe it gives you a rush to think that you matter big-time to me, and if it makes you feel better to feel that way, do so --- but it isn't the case. Sorry. I don't expect you to have the intellectual capacity to recognize when you are wrong. You, as usual, prove me right. Kudos. -=Mike
Guest MikeSC Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 I don't have a vendetta against anybody here. I don't know you. I don't CARE about you. You are an anonymous person posting on a message board. Shockingly enough, that doesn't really generate any passion in me. I will continue to undress you on this board --- as you are so wrong on so many levels, it's borderline comical. This from the guy who called Ann Coulter an "intelligent" woman (until I showed him some quotes). Not to mention calling everyone who disagrees with him "sheep." And you OBVIOUSLY care about me, seeing as you waste precious time with your immature little jabs. You've never "proven" me to be wrong on anything that I can recall, so you couldn't "continue" to prove me wrong. You have to start first. Get on that. That's the first time I've ever seen JMA burn someone. Damn, yo. That's some shit. Mike should just shoot himself in the face now. That was a "burn"? Wow. And that was JMA? Heck, I thought it was JOTW. Ah, you all sound alike anyway. I should "shoot myself in the face" now? Well, I could get lobotomized and enter your intellectual level. -=Mike
Guest JMA Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 I don't seek you out. Maybe it gives you a rush to think that you matter big-time to me, and if it makes you feel better to feel that way, do so --- but it isn't the case. Sorry. I don't expect you to have the intellectual capacity to recognize when you are wrong. You, as usual, prove me right. Kudos. I knew you'd respond because your ego forces you to. You can't STAND being wrong. Thus, you always have to get the last word in. It's textbook. And how exactly have I "proved" you right? Because YOU say you're right? Sorry, that's not how it works. Your condescending attitude simply makes you look foolish. I HAVE proved you wrong on the Counter thing. You called her, and I quote, "an intelligent, well-spoken" woman. You almost immediately changed your opinion once I showed you some quotes, however. I believe you referred to her as "insane." And when people don't agree with you, you label them as mindless drones who just repeat each other. I (and others) have seen you do this. You're even doing it right now, with liberals as the aforementioned group. Your inability to see this is astounding. I suggest you get off your cloud and stop thinking you're superior to every other poster here.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 I don't seek you out. Maybe it gives you a rush to think that you matter big-time to me, and if it makes you feel better to feel that way, do so --- but it isn't the case. Sorry. I don't expect you to have the intellectual capacity to recognize when you are wrong. You, as usual, prove me right. Kudos. I knew you'd respond because your ego forces you to. You can't STAND being wrong. Thus, you always have to get the last word in. It's textbook. And how exactly have I "proved" you right? Because YOU say you're right? Sorry, that's not how it works. Your condescending attitude simply makes you look foolish. I HAVE proved you wrong on the Counter thing. You called her, and I quote, "an intelligent, well-spoken" woman. You almost immediately changed your opinion once I showed you some quotes, however. I believe you referred to her as "insane." And when people don't agree with you, you label them as mindless drones who just repeat each other. I (and others) have seen you do this. You're even doing it right now, with liberals as the aforementioned group. Your inability to see this is astounding. I suggest you get off your cloud and stop thinking you're superior to every other poster here. YAWN. Just padding my post numbers at this point, as I find you pointless, tedious, and boring. -=Mike
MrRant Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 So if you two ever met each other.... would this passion you have turn into a night of passionate angry gay sex?
Guest JMA Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 YAWN. Just padding my post numbers at this point, as I find you pointless, tedious, and boring. -=Mike Sure you are. That's why you keep coming back.
MrRant Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 You never answered my question. Either of you.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 You never answered my question. Either of you. You scared my libido. Again. Shame on thee. -=Mike
Guest JMA Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 You never answered my question. Either of you.
sfaJack Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 You never answered my question. Either of you. Dude...is that a yes??
Vyce Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 What was the purpose of this thread again? It seems to have gone horribly awry.
Guest JMA Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 Dude...is that a yes?? It's the ph34r emotion... so no, it wasn't. Duh.
sfaJack Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 Dude...is that a yes?? It's the ph34r emotion... so no, it wasn't. Duh. I was being facetious, a concept that is apparently foreign to some people.
Guest HungryJack Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 Y'know...this was no 13 yeard old girls playing football story, but it was pretty intereting nonetheless. Nicely done.
Jobber of the Week Posted October 6, 2003 Author Report Posted October 6, 2003 YAWN. Just padding my post numbers at this point, as I find you pointless, tedious, and boring. -=Mike This is like a man shouting "AND ANOTHER THING!" 20 minutes after he lost an arguement.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now