Guest Dave O'Neill, Journalist Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. That's hilarious I agree
RedJed Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 Russo looks f'n cracked out there. Scary. Bummed about this move, but they had to start out with something big for a main event at the first supercard, and there really isnt any high profile match to showcase on that show that would do merit other than maybe a book on the fly job of a Raven-Jarrett rematch, probably for the title, but that wouldnt make sense at this point since Raven is knee deep in the Mitchell feud and for all the time they've spent on that, that needs a proper long term blowoff. But still even if they did Raven-Jarrett again, I have a hard time believing that it would draw more than Hogan-Jarrett would, anyway. Hogan-Jarrett can be much more built up this way, and this gives time to a possibility of Hogan opening up to an idea of involving Russo in the feud since they will surely need more ideas to promote the match now with more time to do it. I like the idea someone suggested that Hogan comes in tonight to cost Jarrett the match and gets beat down big time to sell the injury off. I'd also do the double turn in that match with Russo going with Jarrett to try to defeat Styles, but it doesnt work. Then cue Hogan who comes out to cost Jarrett the match and maybe then goes for Russo afterwards. Right before he's about to get to him, Jarrett does the beatdown. I'm clueless how they are going to explain the whole deal with cancelling the Bound by Glory show though.....I guess they could announce the Hogan-Jarrett match at the start of tonights show, just dont say anything about it this week at all about being cancelled, and then next week after they would cut the injury angle with Hogan, they could say since the match has to be postponed, so will be the show. But that seems like a real slap in the face somewhat to pull something like that too.
Guest nikowwf Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 What's the odds on this one ever coming off? (with Hogan involved) Is it shocking that a Hogan main event is canceled? Would it shock anyone in a few weeks if we find out TNA wanted Hogan to (shock!) put some one over, so he decided to have surgery instead? niko
Guest Boo_Bradley Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 ECW post poned their 1st PPV as well, TNA ain't done yet...
Guest nikowwf Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 I didn't say TNA is done. I didn't say they'd never have a PPV. I think they will have a big show next year....im not sure Hogan will be a part of it though. Hogan will do the show if its good for Hogan, and thats it. niko
Open the Muggy Gate Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 Does anyone find it ironic that in the match that TNA shows of Hogan in action, he fucks up his knee?? I know I do.
Kahran Ramsus Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 ECW post poned their 1st PPV as well, TNA ain't done yet... And it never did become a threat to the WWF. If TNA is to become a threat, it must realize that the path of ECW is the path to oblivion.
Guest TDinDC1112 Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 ECW post poned their 1st PPV as well, TNA ain't done yet... And it never did become a threat to the WWF. If TNA is to become a threat, it must realize that the path of ECW is the path to oblivion. TNA doesn't need to be (and probably will never be) a "threat" to WWE. They just need to be an alternative. ECW was an alternative.
Stephen Joseph Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 you know, this aint on the tna site
The Ghost of bps21 Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 TNA is still trying to figure out how to deal with it. They cancelled the show...but they need to explain: A: Why there is no show B: Why Hogan isn't around
slimm44 Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 TNA hasn't officially announced it being cancelled just like when Raven lost to Jarrett for the title in April, the internet claimed Raven had not signed another contract to be on the show. Therefore it could be fake news or a set up
The Ghost of bps21 Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 Raven hadn't signed another contract. He appeaered the next week on a pay by appearance basis, then took a week off and signed a long term deal.
Styles Posted October 22, 2003 Report Posted October 22, 2003 Well on the bright side this at least fouls up the WWF's plan to bring Hogan back for Mania XX. Took the words right out of my mouth man, that's the real bright side for me : no Hogan for Mania.... ...but, of course, he still hasn't signed any contracts for NWATNA so this could mean no Hogan for them till after Mania. Conspiracy theory: Hogan knew he needed the surgery and could have waited. Him and Mcmahon worked out their differences to work Wrestlemania. Hogan uses the surgery to get out of the TNA agreement (which was never actually signed) and will be nice and healthy by the time March 14 rolls around.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 23, 2003 Report Posted October 23, 2003 ECW post poned their 1st PPV as well, TNA ain't done yet... And it never did become a threat to the WWF. If TNA is to become a threat, it must realize that the path of ECW is the path to oblivion. TNA doesn't need to be (and probably will never be) a "threat" to WWE. They just need to be an alternative. ECW was an alternative. Odds are, WWE won't give TNA money as they did with ECW. Which means TNA would go under faster. -=Mike
Guest nikowwf Posted October 24, 2003 Report Posted October 24, 2003 Hogan might be wrestling in Japan next month, btw. niko
Guest nikowwf Posted October 24, 2003 Report Posted October 24, 2003 Sorry, that was wrong, its January. (that would be 1/4 instead of 11/4) Apparently I'm blind - never mind! niko
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now