Guest Besus Report post Posted December 14, 2003 We all know that it has been reported that Brock/Goldberg might happen at Wrestlemania.It has even been reported that it may be a unification match.Now do you think they might go with Title vs Title? If so then I guess their will be 1 major title again in WWE. The "World Undisputed Title" I like it.Your thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 No. I doubt it'll happen at all. The thing with the champion on both show kind of ruined the split because now you had guys chasing each other to each show. No they should just keep it 1 world title for each show. And I think that it's been said that Brock/Goldberg would be non-title. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 I was kidding about it at first when the idea of champion vs. champion was first brought up. Even though, I'm a huge fan of that idea, I'd say no, I'm happy with two world champions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 I can't see them putting the title's back together. Though, I wouldn't mind seeing Lesnar, Angle, Benoit or Cena as champion being on Raw once a week, but I wouldn't want to see anyone from Raw as champion on Smackdown. Becides Jericho but that ain't happening. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mole 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Even though one isn't real.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Besus Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Even though one isn't real.. Exactly! You beat me too it. Raw world title is the damn wcw title.Who dont know that by now? They dont even even call the raw title "wwe world title" just "world title".They should change the belt design and Rename it "wwe world title". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Yeah, but a lot of non-internet fans think of Raw as the "real" WWE show and SD as second rate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Its sad really. Who would have ever thought Vince would sabatoge his own show? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Metal Maniac 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 They call it the World Title because the SD belt is the WWE title. If they called it the WWE World Title, then it'd just make the WWE title look silly and pointless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toxxic 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Think about it - one world title? WWE have too many people at the top, or people they want to push there, to only have one world title. Suppose Trips has even half the swing over the unified title as he's had over the Raw title, and you have it as his for half the year. Then Taker's going to be in the mix at some point... and Lesnar since he's the only big workhorse in the company... and Angle if he's fit... Goldberg, assuming his contract is extended, not to mention Kne is being pushed world title-wards now. You can only have about half a dozen guys at most in the title hunt before some of them just spend too long away. It's difficult enough to fit in Benoit, Jericho, eddy, Booker, Cena etc at the moment when there's two titles - condense it to one again and things will just get far too cluttered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Besus Report post Posted December 14, 2003 If they called it the WWE World Title, then it'd just make the WWE title look silly and pointless. Hell to me the world title is silly and pointless.They can call the title on raw wwe "world" title and The one sd wwe heavyweight title. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Just to clear things up: RAW - World Heavyweight Title SD - WWE Championship Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Downhome 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 If they have both champs in a match at WM, without the titles on the line, then I'll be HIGHLY pissed. What the fuck kind of idea is a WM without the WORLD TITLES on the line? I'd just assume Brock/Goldberg be a straight up match, with neither of them the champ anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 I hope it's a straight up match myself. But where does that leave the titles? So many things they can do on Smackdown. But Raw? Kane is suppose to face Taker so that leaves Triple H © Vs ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Besus Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Did the wwe bring in the wcw us title? No.They even got new tag titles.Why couldn't they design a new world title. They gona bring in the wcw title,LMAO. Lilian should just call the title the WCW championship when she introduces whoever is raw champ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Well, they bought the title so I don't blame for reusing it. However, they use the same belt, but change the US title looks and bring in NEW tag belts instead of using the former WCW tag titles? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 I don't see the big deal in that? They updated all of their belts as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Douche Report post Posted December 14, 2003 You don't get it though. RAW and HHH sucks=POOP lol or something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JN News 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 I hope it's a straight up match myself. But where does that leave the titles? So many things they can do on Smackdown. But Raw? Kane is suppose to face Taker so that leaves Triple H © Vs ? The Rock. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ultra Violence 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 What the fuck kind of idea is a WM without the WORLD TITLES on the line?. Wrestlemania I ........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisMWaters 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Oh, and the Raw World Title isn't exactly the same as the old WCW belt. Why? That's why Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Max Peter David Report post Posted December 14, 2003 Did the wwe bring in the wcw us title? Yes. They put over Harley Race as champ, and last night on Velocity called Kanyon a former "WWE" US champion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Metal Maniac 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 That's just WWF BS, though. The ACTUAL WCW US title is buried in the lineage of the World title, along with like, 5 other belts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Downhome 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 What the fuck kind of idea is a WM without the WORLD TITLES on the line?. Wrestlemania I ........ Well obviously. That was the first year of it, they were just trying something new. A WM without a title match now would be a horrible decision. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 I'm glad to know Kanyon's US title reign is still recognized / remembered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ultra Violence 0 Report post Posted December 14, 2003 What the fuck kind of idea is a WM without the WORLD TITLES on the line?. Wrestlemania I ........ Well obviously. That was the first year of it, they were just trying something new. A WM without a title match now would be a horrible decision. I completely agree..... I was just being a smart asshole and bringing up the past Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steviekick 0 Report post Posted December 15, 2003 Oh, and the Raw World Title isn't exactly the same as the old WCW belt. Why? That's why Another difference is that the WWE version of this belt is also smaller than the WWE one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Frank Grimes Report post Posted December 15, 2003 Before tonight, I thought there was no way they were going to re-unify the titles. But you know, dropping the Undisputed title after just a month and never getting it back has to be killing someone. Just another example of me giving back to the business and getting nothing in return. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrRant 0 Report post Posted December 15, 2003 They can have someone win both titles at WM but not "unify them". Say Brock wins them both and can float inbetween shows and put just his World Title on the line to Jericho and if Jericho wins then he gets just the RAW belt and that's it while Brock retains the SD belt. Perhaps he does put both on the line and Jericho wins then he floats but if he loses the SD one then he goes back to RAW. My only rule would be they would have to defend either both belts or only the belt of the show. So that you can't have Jericho (RAW) defend the SD belt against Booker T. Unless that would make them automatically a SD wrestler. Perhaps at Summerslam you do it again. Just an idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MixxMaster 0 Report post Posted December 15, 2003 Eh, I would rather see them name the belts differently, based more on each show. So, how about the Raw Championship belt and the Smackdown Championship belt? Much better than one(Smackdown!) representing the company in name(WWE Championship belt), while the other sounds big, as in World, but also Heavyweight (which is bad, sounds like a HOSS belt). Of course, a redesign of the Raw belt should be done, since the WWE never pulled the trigger on the Monday Nitro idea... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
