Guest evenflowDDT Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 Well, since there apparently aren't many more sick, gross baby pics in this thread, and Boo_Bradley has been hyphenated, I guess I'll pick up the slack. This is a link to sick, gross baby pics (specifically, a birth defect known as "Harlequin Fetus")! However, unlike Boo_Bradley's there's no agenda involved, unless one would count the return of sick, gross baby pics (with a proper warning...I'm a sick man, but a polite one) to this thread as an agenda. Don't click this link unless you want to see sick, gross baby pics! I wouldn't want anyone to click this link without knowing they would see sick, gross baby pics...because that's just mean.
Guest Frank_Nabbit Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 Abortions for all! Booo! Well then Abortions for none! Booooooooo! Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... Abortions for some, commerative hats for others? /misquoted alien
Guest Frank_Nabbit Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 http://www.hatelabs.com/distractions/albano.swf The Farthest thing from dead babies ever... Bunny Babies. In 1726, Mary Toft was a 25-year-old married woman in Godalming, England who had most unusual pregnancies. In August, after the miscarriage of a normal four-month-old fetus, Mary still seemed to show signs of being pregnant. A month later, she "gave birth" to what appeared to be the guts of a pig. Wait, it gets weirder. In October, so goes the story, she gave birth to a rabbit "with cats paws and head." Thereafter, she gave birth to one rabbit after another - 12 in all.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 But did she give birth to a hand?...
Guest evenflowDDT Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 (edited) Bunny Babies. In 1726, Mary Toft was a 25-year-old married woman in Godalming, England who had most unusual pregnancies. In August, after the miscarriage of a normal four-month-old fetus, Mary still seemed to show signs of being pregnant. A month later, she "gave birth" to what appeared to be the guts of a pig. Wait, it gets weirder. In October, so goes the story, she gave birth to a rabbit "with cats paws and head." Thereafter, she gave birth to one rabbit after another - 12 in all. Somewhere, a furry/zoophiliac is masturbating furiously. Don't look at me...once she miscarried my hands went right back to the keyboard. Including the new arrival. Man, I wonder what Satanic pact her husband made for her to give birth to those? EDIT: Aww....hoax? Edited December 31, 2003 by evenflowDDT
Ravenbomb Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 so...the whole abortion talk is done? Seemed like this was gonna be Abortion talk #29 then Dames banned Boo and then the thread's focus went all...crokus...
kkktookmybabyaway Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 The abortion talk got aborted in the second trimester of this thread...
The Dames Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 The rule has always been in there, it's the one about grotesque images. Seriously, misleading posters to a horrible picture of a baby with its head and arm torn off just to force your opinions on abortion onto others is fucking disgusting. Dames While I agree with the banning since it was BEYOND the pale.... is there warnings anymore or not if something is grotesque but not as overly bad as this? I wouldn't have been upset if he hadn't tricked people into viewing said photograph. That display of deception was enough to warrant an auto ban in my opinion. Warning are still in place for milder offenses. Dames
TheFranchise Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 Abortions for all! Booo! Well then Abortions for none! Booooooooo! Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... Abortions for some, commerative hats for others? /misquoted alien Miniture American Flags for others!
Guest Danny Dubya v 2.0 Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 OK, I'm just going to force myself into the delusion of those babies just being grotesque dolls made by zombie lovers or whatever and NOT have any dreams of ever being eaten alive by a deformed baby or waking up and trying to pull the red blobs out of my eyesockets.
alfdogg Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Remind to cancel my forthcoming post: My Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia. Cancel your forthcoming post: Your Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia.
DerangedHermit Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Remind to cancel my forthcoming post: My Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia. Cancel your forthcoming post: Your Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia. Where's IDRM to disagree with this stuff?
Guest FrigidSoul Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 I wonder when we'll see an aborted fetus involved in a WWE angle; we've had necrophylia and the use of feces.
DerangedHermit Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 I wonder when we'll see an aborted fetus involved in a WWE angle; we've had necrophylia and the use of feces. Well, they've had a hand.
Guest FrigidSoul Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 I wonder when we'll see an aborted fetus involved in a WWE angle; we've had necrophylia and the use of feces. Well, they've had a hand. But it wasn't an aborted hand
Highland Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 I never thought I'd ever see the Dames just go off like that. Not that I blame them after being told the description of that picture. So is this the most dramatic banning ever?
CanadianGuitarist Posted October 18, 2005 Report Posted October 18, 2005 There's waaaaaaaay to much going on here.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now