Nathan Jones is a quitter

[OldSchoolWrestling 0]

Statement #1:

Nathan Jones is a quitter.

 

Cena: False. Nathan is somebody who is going to do what he wants to do in life. He didn’t fit in this business.

 

Gunn: True. Whenever you get stuff handed to you and then you just quit and leave the boys hanging, I don’t think that’s cool.

 

Statement #2:

DX was better than Evolution.

 

Cena: True. They would do whatever they want when they wanted. It wasn’t about money. It wasn’t about getting paid. It was just about being renegades.

 

Gunn: True. That’s a fact.

 

Statement #3:

Guys should stop hitting each other over the head with steel chairs.

 

Cena: True. They should move on to steel chains. No, check that. False. Stick to the steel chairs, I’ll keep the steel chain.

 

 

Gunn: False. In every match? No. But every once in a while? Yes. Because some people need to get hit over the head with a chair.

 

Statement #4:

The Kansas City Chiefs will win the Super Bowl in 2004.

 

Cena: False. The Patriots will win the Super Bowl in 2004. They’re going to beat the Eagles and the score is going to be 17-14.

 

 

Gunn: False. They’re playing OK, but they’re not playing good enough to beat Indianapolis.

 

Statement #5:

Saddam Hussein will die in 2004.

 

Cena: False. They’re going to keep him around for political b.s. He should have already been dead in 2003.

 

 

Gunn: True. Big time. For sure.

[Guest Trivia247]

Nathan Jones... he was living Comparisent of the XFL for Vince.

[BifEverchad 0]

I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers.

 

Ugh, when is he back anyways?

[OldSchoolWrestling 0]

I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers.

 

Ugh, when is he back anyways?

Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing.

[ChrisMWaters 0]

I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers.

 

Ugh, when is he back anyways?

Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing.

Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come!

 

Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03.

[King Cucaracha 0]

I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers.

 

Ugh, when is he back anyways?

Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing.

Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come!

 

Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03.

No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001?

[ChrisMWaters 0]

I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers.

 

Ugh, when is he back anyways?

Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing.

Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come!

 

Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03.

No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001?

Or even better...Mo in 1995!

[2GOLD 0]

Statement #3:

Guys should stop hitting each other over the head with steel chairs.

 

Gunn: False. In every match? No. But every once in a while? Yes. Because some people need to get hit over the head with a chair.

 

 

Guys like Billy Gunn

[Art Sandusky 0]

What was B-2's catchphrase again? I remember loving it, but it escapes me at the moment. Wasn't it just saying "Word" or something after Cena's rap?

[Guest Anglesault]

Boo yeah.

[ChrisMWaters 0]

What was B-2's catchphrase again? I remember loving it, but it escapes me at the moment. Wasn't it just saying "Word" or something after Cena's rap?

Yep, that's it.

 

Interesting note: Around the time of Rumble 03: Rodney Mack debuted as Red Dog (or Redd Dawg or whatever) to be Cena's NEW running buddy...which lasted all of 2 shows.

[dubq 0]

Statement #4:

The Kansas City Chiefs will win the Super Bowl in 2004.

 

Statement #5:

Saddam Hussein will die in 2004.

Who even cares? Why are they even posting retarded stuff like this on their web site? Oh, I forgot... WWE and all that.

[Prime Time Andrew Doyle 0]

I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers.

 

Ugh, when is he back anyways?

Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing.

Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come!

 

Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03.

No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001?

Or even better...Mo in 1995!

Even better still, like one of the Bushwhackers in 1991

[Lil' Bitch 0]

Statement #3:

Guys should stop hitting each other over the head with steel chairs.

 

Cena: True. They should move on to steel chains. No, check that. False. Stick to the steel chairs, I’ll keep the steel chain.

 

 

Gunn: False. In every match? No. But every once in a while? Yes. Because some people need to get hit over the head with a chair.

 

The whole thing.

[ChrisMWaters 0]

I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers.

 

Ugh, when is he back anyways?

Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing.

Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come!

 

Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03.

No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001?

Or even better...Mo in 1995!

Even better still, like one of the Bushwhackers in 1991

Actually, despite what WWE would like you to believe...Mo lasted a shorter time that Bushwacker Luke's time in the Rumble.

 

It goes either Mo 95 or Warlord 89, then Luke 91.

[Masked Man of Mystery 0]

They should lower the chairshot ratio, it's part of why Kurt Angle will probably end up the new Droz. Or maybe find something differant to hit people with. The chain would probably be a lot easier on a person and they have much the same effect selling wise

[Guest Your Olympic Hero]

Or even better...Mo in 1995!

Haha yes the only man to last less time than Luke in 91 or Warlord in 89. Why do I know this stuff?

[Jobber of the Week 0]

Kurt Angle's neck begs to differ on the chair thing.

 

Cena's comment about "political b.s." makes up for his sticking up for Nathan Jones.

[MillenniumMan831 0]

Or even better...Mo in 1995!

Haha yes the only man to last less time than Luke in 91 or Warlord in 89. Why do I know this stuff?

If you count buzzer to elimination, than Mo has got to be the shortest entry ever. The Warlord slowly jogged to the ring and Luke took forever to get there. What about Lawler in 1997? He was 2 feet from the ring, all he did was take off his jacket, hop in the ring, and get punched out. Tazz has got to be in the running. We need an official SmartMark Stat Checker.

[Just John 0]

They should lower the chairshot ratio, it's part of why Kurt Angle will probably end up the new Droz. Or maybe find something differant to hit people with. The chain would probably be a lot easier on a person and they have much the same effect selling wise

Or they could go back to WCW's wrapped up metal object of death.