OldSchoolWrestling Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 Statement #1: Nathan Jones is a quitter. Cena: False. Nathan is somebody who is going to do what he wants to do in life. He didn’t fit in this business. Gunn: True. Whenever you get stuff handed to you and then you just quit and leave the boys hanging, I don’t think that’s cool. Statement #2: DX was better than Evolution. Cena: True. They would do whatever they want when they wanted. It wasn’t about money. It wasn’t about getting paid. It was just about being renegades. Gunn: True. That’s a fact. Statement #3: Guys should stop hitting each other over the head with steel chairs. Cena: True. They should move on to steel chains. No, check that. False. Stick to the steel chairs, I’ll keep the steel chain. Gunn: False. In every match? No. But every once in a while? Yes. Because some people need to get hit over the head with a chair. Statement #4: The Kansas City Chiefs will win the Super Bowl in 2004. Cena: False. The Patriots will win the Super Bowl in 2004. They’re going to beat the Eagles and the score is going to be 17-14. Gunn: False. They’re playing OK, but they’re not playing good enough to beat Indianapolis. Statement #5: Saddam Hussein will die in 2004. Cena: False. They’re going to keep him around for political b.s. He should have already been dead in 2003. Gunn: True. Big time. For sure.
Guest Trivia247 Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 Nathan Jones... he was living Comparisent of the XFL for Vince.
BifEverchad Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers. Ugh, when is he back anyways?
OldSchoolWrestling Posted December 30, 2003 Author Report Posted December 30, 2003 I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers. Ugh, when is he back anyways? Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing.
ChrisMWaters Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers. Ugh, when is he back anyways? Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing. Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come! Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03.
King Cucaracha Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers. Ugh, when is he back anyways? Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing. Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come! Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03. No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001?
ChrisMWaters Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers. Ugh, when is he back anyways? Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing. Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come! Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03. No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001? Or even better...Mo in 1995!
2GOLD Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 Statement #3: Guys should stop hitting each other over the head with steel chairs. Gunn: False. In every match? No. But every once in a while? Yes. Because some people need to get hit over the head with a chair. Guys like Billy Gunn
Art Sandusky Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 What was B-2's catchphrase again? I remember loving it, but it escapes me at the moment. Wasn't it just saying "Word" or something after Cena's rap?
ChrisMWaters Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 What was B-2's catchphrase again? I remember loving it, but it escapes me at the moment. Wasn't it just saying "Word" or something after Cena's rap? Yep, that's it. Interesting note: Around the time of Rumble 03: Rodney Mack debuted as Red Dog (or Redd Dawg or whatever) to be Cena's NEW running buddy...which lasted all of 2 shows.
dubq Posted December 30, 2003 Report Posted December 30, 2003 Statement #4: The Kansas City Chiefs will win the Super Bowl in 2004. Statement #5: Saddam Hussein will die in 2004. Who even cares? Why are they even posting retarded stuff like this on their web site? Oh, I forgot... WWE and all that.
Prime Time Andrew Doyle Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers. Ugh, when is he back anyways? Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing. Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come! Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03. No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001? Or even better...Mo in 1995! Even better still, like one of the Bushwhackers in 1991
Lil' Bitch Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 Statement #3: Guys should stop hitting each other over the head with steel chairs. Cena: True. They should move on to steel chains. No, check that. False. Stick to the steel chairs, I’ll keep the steel chain. Gunn: False. In every match? No. But every once in a while? Yes. Because some people need to get hit over the head with a chair. The whole thing.
ChrisMWaters Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 I usually like these segments from WWE.COM, but this one stunk. I think it was because of Gunn and his lame-o, lazy answers. Ugh, when is he back anyways? Last I heard he was supposed to have returned in December. Soon I'm guessing. Surprise Royal Rumble Entrant, here we come! Let's hope he lasts as long as B-2 did in 03. No, B-2 had offense. How about Tazz in 2001? Or even better...Mo in 1995! Even better still, like one of the Bushwhackers in 1991 Actually, despite what WWE would like you to believe...Mo lasted a shorter time that Bushwacker Luke's time in the Rumble. It goes either Mo 95 or Warlord 89, then Luke 91.
Masked Man of Mystery Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 They should lower the chairshot ratio, it's part of why Kurt Angle will probably end up the new Droz. Or maybe find something differant to hit people with. The chain would probably be a lot easier on a person and they have much the same effect selling wise
Guest Your Olympic Hero Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 Or even better...Mo in 1995! Haha yes the only man to last less time than Luke in 91 or Warlord in 89. Why do I know this stuff?
Jobber of the Week Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 Kurt Angle's neck begs to differ on the chair thing. Cena's comment about "political b.s." makes up for his sticking up for Nathan Jones.
MillenniumMan831 Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 Or even better...Mo in 1995! Haha yes the only man to last less time than Luke in 91 or Warlord in 89. Why do I know this stuff? If you count buzzer to elimination, than Mo has got to be the shortest entry ever. The Warlord slowly jogged to the ring and Luke took forever to get there. What about Lawler in 1997? He was 2 feet from the ring, all he did was take off his jacket, hop in the ring, and get punched out. Tazz has got to be in the running. We need an official SmartMark Stat Checker.
Just John Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 They should lower the chairshot ratio, it's part of why Kurt Angle will probably end up the new Droz. Or maybe find something differant to hit people with. The chain would probably be a lot easier on a person and they have much the same effect selling wise Or they could go back to WCW's wrapped up metal object of death.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now